
yesterday's spring in NJ-we're more than an exit
I’ve become an audible junkie. Listening to books is the next best thing to reading them, leaving your hands free to do other things, like scrubbing your grout (which I never do, but I have that option). So, yesterday, I was listening to In The Woods, the 2007 Edgar Award winning novel by Tana French, when her Irish police detective/profiler makes this observation:
“We all need to believe in something… Every society in the world, ever, has some form of belief system. But now, how many people do you know are Christian? Not just going to church but actually Christian, like trying to do things the way Jesus would have? Well, it’s not like people can have faith in political ideologies. Our government doesn’t even have ideologies, as far as anyone can tell. I just meant there isn’t one overall philosophy, so people have to make their own faith. I was thinking of people who make a religion out of something completely different, like money.
Actually, that’s the nearest thing that government has to an ideology and I’m not talking about bribes, Sam. Nowadays, it’s not just *unfortunate* if you have a low paid job, have you noticed? It’s actually *irresponsible*. You’re not a good member of society. You’re being very, very naughty not to have a big house and a fancy car.”
“But if anyone asks for a raise, they’re being very, very naughty to be threatening their employer’s profit margin, after everything he’s done for the economy.”
“Exactly, if you’re not rich, you’re a lesser being who shouldn’t have the gall to expect a living wage from the decent people who are.”
Back in the Gilded Age, if you were a banker who went bankrupt, you would be excluded from society and ostracized by your family. In The Age of Innocence, by Edith Wharton, the only person who would visit Regina Beaufort, wife of a bankrupt banker was Countess Olenska, the scandalous cousin who left her miserable marriage in a social class where women did not divorce their husbands. It was simply immoral and unacceptable to be financially ruined or to ruin other people. By the way these people reacted, you’d think the banker had been discovered to be a serial killer.
But that’s not the way we do things nowadays. Paul Krugman’s column today focuses on the salaries of the finance industry giants. You may be surprised to find they are on the rise again after they took a beating in 2008. Well, with all of that cash that we the taxpayers gave them, they now have the capital to continue to gamble, setting aside enough money for lavish bonuses, of course. And they will be encouraged to take risks that lead to even greater profits, at the expense of the accounts of the money they manage, because that is the mentality. It is the philosophy of the salesman. Anything that increases their bottom line must be good and moral.
That is why I was so disturbed to recently receive an email from my governor, Jon Corzine, who is running for re-election this year. He considers it a great honor to be praised by Jack Welch. Perhaps Corzine has forgotten what state he governs but the finance industry, the marketers and the salesmen are not the only constituents he has. When I first moved to NJ 20 years ago, the state was a mecca of innovation and high technology. This state’s industries included, telecommunications, satellite, pharmaceticals and biotech as well as the Wall Street Journal. (BTW, I used to work across the street from the WSJ post 9-11. The new concrete security barriers that went up to barricade their site were less than reassuring.) Jack Welch is no hero of the scientific research community. His management practices are geared towards selling things, not creating. Creation is sometimes a very frustrating and painstaking activity. It is feast and famine, fits and starts, marvellous breakthroughs followed by dead ends. It requires coordination and collaboration. Trying to box it into a “kill or be killed”, “round up all the resources for yourself” mentality is seriously non-productive.
I only mention this because the fact that research hasn’t produced anything lately, or so the marketers tell us, severely impacts the image of the scientist in this day and age. We are being very, very naughty because we aren’t making ourselves rich. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be in the lab and our jobs wouldn’t be threatened by outsourcing where the Indians will work for nothing, by God, and they will be grateful. Nevermind the mergers that suck the life’s blood out of the research process. Nevermind the lack of human resources actually required to get things done. Nevermind the lapse in time it takes to apply basic research to industry. If it can’t be done quickly with a massive payoff to the bottom line of some Jack Welch type and his hordes of testosterone fueled salesmen and marketers, you haven’t done your job and you are an immoral being that doesn’t deserve a living wage.
Thou shalt make money for the finance executives. All bow. Amen.
DiGG This and Share….












Filed under: General | 52 Comments »