There is a Sufi proverb that says, “In the desert, there is no sign that says, ‘Thou shalt not eat stones'” It always struck me as the middle eastern version of “I never promised you a rose garden” or “You can’t always get what you want but if you try sometimes, you might find, you get what you need”.
I freely acknowledge that I am not an Obamaphile. Whatever he does to unhinge his fan base goes right over my head. So, perhaps my attempts at objectivity are futile. Here is what I observed:
His body language to her is like that of an elementary school boy to his teacher. He looks down at his paper, his head cocked, he doodles, he is disinterested and finds her tedious. As for his debate performances, I don’t think he has improved at all. Others will disagree but that is where the beauty of youtube and archives will prove me right and the others wrong. She is rock steady and confident and rarely falters. And the debate format is where his immaturity is most obvious: his answers ramble. He does not come from a “center point”. It’s like having to write an essay on a book you didn’t finish.
She, on the other hand, read the book, discussed it with her colleagues and thought about it until she understood what the author was saying and could point out where the author could have improved.
It’s not experience exactly. It is mindfulness. No, that’s not the right word. It is like being “centered”, knowing what the boundaries and parameters are and how they relate to each other. She has it, he doesn’t.
There is no comparison.
If he weren’t the token male, it’s hard to imagine how they would have ended up on the same stage.
But the Obamaphiles must have their way. They will not be denied, leaving the rest of us to eat stones.
But oh, how lovely the feast she has prepared…
Filed under: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Presidential Election 2008 | Tagged: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Texas debate | 15 Comments »