A post-election poll by Celinda Lake’s Lake Research Partners found that, by a margin of 3 percentage points, Americans now trust Republicans in Congress more than Democrats when it comes to Social Security — surely the first time since the program became a signature issue for the Democratic Party in the 1930s.
…
Heather McGee, the director of Demos’ Washington office, said that when Democrats talk of cutting Social Security, it only serves to support the narrative that the government is to blame for the nation’s economic problems. “Bashing government is a way to shift attention from the decline of the middle class and widening inequality,” she said.
And while increasing the Social Security retirement age is considered a fairly benign change inside the Beltway, 7 in 10 voters oppose the idea, most of them very intensely, said Lake. Opposition is particularly strong among such groups as young voters, women under 55, non-college graduates, independent women and rural voters — in other words, those much sought-after swing voters.
“That reflects the different life experiences of those who have this debate versus those who will be affected by the policy outcomes,” Molyneux said.
Even a year ago, I couldn’t imagine Democrats wavering in their support of Social Security like this. It’s one thing when Republicans propose stuff like this — it’s almost their job!! But, when voters elect Democrats it’s because we count on them to protect us from the worst of Republican delusions.
[UPDATE] Susie at Suburban Guerilla shared this timely piece:
Who here is sick of all Palin all the time? Raise your hand. Yeah, me too. Neither side of the aisle will ever convince me they’re right. I’ve got my opinion, mercifully untainted by media spin. And like I have always said, you can’t get anything of value from cable news gasbags on TV going after each other. Turn them off. Once you do, you can form your own opinion without all that crap cluttering up your analytical thought processes. Let the right and left fight it out while you focus on more important things.
Here’s a problem that I’ve seen at every company I’ve worked at, and there are good reasons to believe that it afflicts every company out there. That’s because I think it’s grounded in human nature: dog-and-pony-itis.
That’s the phrase I use for what happens to meetings over time. Many readers will be familiar with the process: a company gradually accumulates regular meetings on its internal calendar – project team meetings, individual chemistry and biology meetings inside that, overall review meetings, resourcing, planning, interdisciplinary meetings. . .everyone who’s anyone, in some companies, has to be calling a meeting of their very own.
Eventually, someone says “Enough!” and purges the schedule, replacing the tangle of overlapping meetings with A Brand New Meeting or two. These will actually discuss issues, for once, and people are encouraged to actually say what’s really going on with their projects. For once. And who knows, maybe that’s the case (for once) – but it doesn’t last.
Because every time, in my experience, the Brand New Meeting itself starts to collect barnacles. Over time, it becomes less useful, and more of a show. The music starts up, the Pomeranian dogs start hopping around and barking, and the trained horses make their entrance from the wings. It becomes more expedient to just get up and tell people the broad strokes of a project, especially the broad strokes that are actually working, and leave the messy details out. And gradually, other meetings spring up to try to take up the slack, since nothing ever seems to get done at the Brand New. . .
You’ve been there, right? If you have any suggestions, send them to Derek. My pet peeve is borg like IT departments who seem determined to make you fit into their one-size-fits-all computer build, forcing you to do endless workarounds that impact productivity, which the MBAs are always screaming about. What I find really annoying about this is that MBAs are constantly reshuffling the deck chairs to (try to) make us more productive (without any real inkling of what their business is about or how it really works) but they weirdly seem to overlook the IT department. Selective pressure is constantly applied to the rest of us in a sort of Malthusian catastrophe scenario, taking out the good with the bad and making us to (even) more with fewer people (than we had when it was just merely difficult but is now next to impossible) but the IT department is given some miraculous exemption so that they may continue on as the neanderthals they are without ever having to evolve. I heard similar complaints from people from other pharmas at the conference I attended last week but in this case, misery did not add to a sense of comraderie but continued frustration and despair. There is simply no getting around the IT mafia and they are making our work so hard to do that some R&D users at other companies have literally begged the sys admins to disconnect them from the corporate network.
I don’t know what the IT department has on the MBAs (take that back. I *can* imagine what they have, actually) but the ongoing ability of the MBAs to overlook the IT mafia is baffling and counterproductive. As one colleague of mine noted yesterday, we’re constantly under threat of being outsourced if we don’t perform but IT never is. Why can’t we shop around for out own IT vendors, especially if our business unit performs a particular kind of function with our computers that is 95% different than the typical Microsoft Excel user? Good question. I’m going to bring it up at the next Town Hall meeting. It sounds innocuous enough. You can’t *possibly* be fired for asking something like that. Right? RIGHT??
What are your pet business bugaboos or latest MBA Bull from on high that has your knickers in a twist?
Leaders of the Democratic-controlled Senate have said that they will not act on the repeal measure, effectively scuttling it.
While conceding that reality, House Republicans said they would press ahead with their “repeal and replace” strategy. But the next steps will be much more difficult, as they try to forge consensus on alternatives emphasizing “free market solutions” to control health costs and expand coverage.
{{snort!}} Republicans just kill me with their sense of humor. The health care reform bill passed last year *was* a “free market solution”. It was about as free market as you can get and still call it reform. Once again, Democrats have failed to capitalize on this fact. They should be playing up the free market aspects while everyone comes to hate, hate, HATE the bill. That way they can say, “See? This is what Republicans say they wanted. It’s free market. They didn’t want competition from a public option or anything that would actually make it less expensive and more efficient for you, the consumer. Why are the Republicans whining about it now? What do Republicans want??” Anyway, the reality is that open enrollment is over for the year so we’re stuck with the increased costs of coverage without any significant increases in, er, coverage. Well, except for the coverage of kids until they’re 26, which will be great for Brooke but sucks for all of those kids who just aged out and who weren’t covered in the past several years. No soup for you. It’s particularly tough on girls whose cost for insurance on the free market is absurdly high for minimal coverage. I suppose that goes with the risk of pregnancy, which could be avoided if the health insurance plan covers the cost of birth control and abortion.
Speaking of abortion, the recent discovery of the abortion clinic from hell in Philadelphia invalidates any argument the antiabortion crew can come up with. An abortion clinic was closed down recently when a raid conducted for illegal drugs unintentionally uncovered aseptic conditions so horrific it makes the stomach churn. This excerpt of the grand jury indictment from Jeralyn is not for the squeamish:
The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instruments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.
The people who ran this sham medical practice included no doctors other than Gosnell himself, and not even a single nurse. Two of his employees had been to medical school, but neither of them were licensed physicians….Among the rest of the staff, there was no one with any medical licensing or relevant certification at all. But that didn’t stop them from making diagnoses, performing procedures, administering drugs.
The AP story says that women from the NJ suburbs were ushered into slightly cleaner areas of the clinic for their late term abortions because they were wealthier and more likely to file a complaint.
It’s outrageous that women get treated like subhuman animals by these criminals and by the states themselves that force the more desperate and poor to wait until it’s too late before they have the money to undergo these unsafe and unsanitary procedures. As the indictment says, “Pennsylvania is not a third world country” but this is where the antiabortion fanatics are taking us. And it’s not like they don’t know better. Many of the most fervent antiabortion foes are women my mom’s age who grew up in the 50’s and 60’s and have no illusions about what they are forcing on younger, desperate women. You have to wonder what is motivating them to force us back to the bad old days. But abortions will never end no matter how illegal they are. This clinic gives us living proof of what is to come. It is inevitable and Roe v. Wade can not stand in its way. Ironically, Roe may be exacerbating the situation because it is easy to chip away at the exercise of reproductive rights without actually taking Roe away. Roe is an incredibly weak and polarizing law. Women have to stop relying on it and refight this battle all over again using stronger arguments, laws and even an equal rights amendment. Until then, expect to find a lot more of these clinics showing up in the news.
Joe Lieberman is retiring. yay. This news is anticlimactic. He’s done his bit for the insurance industry and now he can leave. Great. Don’t let the door hit ya’:
Lieberman’s decision “enables him for the next two years to be an honest broker between Democrats and Republicans on issues that matter to him (stop laughing)— on national security, the debt issue and the environment,” said a Lieberman aide who spoke on the condition of anonymity because a formal announcement had not been made.
Kent Conrad, a blue dog from North Dakota, is also retiring. Stu Rothenberg says that this will make it harder for the Democrats to keep their majority in the Senate.
What majority? Last session, they had a filibuster proof 60 seats and it *still* wasn’t enough. To have a real majority, any party has to out number the Republicans by a ratio of roughly 2:1. (Sorry, Tea Party lurkers. You can’t join with Republicans to make them listen to you. They are not on your side and haven’t been in about a century.) So, the loss of Lieberman and Rothenberg doesn’t mean squat. The Democrats and the country has to get really serious about tossing Republicans out if they want to get stuff done for average Americans. Prophylactic: If you don’t like Democrats that much in majority, there’s no law that says you can’t start another party that can form a coalition with the Democrats to make Republicans a minority party for generations to come. It’s a given that there will be substantial push back from both parties but, realistically, what choice is there? You can either whine about it or do something about it. Don’t like to vote for either party? Field your own candidates.
In more promising news, Roche and Plexxicon have developed a new melanoma drug that significantly prolongs life, at least temporarily. Of course, the clinical trials come with a price. Some of the most desperately ill patients were given placebo. This is a harsh but necessary reality in the discovery of new drugs. The good news is that the FDA asked the companies involved to expedite the analysis of the trials so that patients in the placebo arm of the trial could cross over and receive the therapy. So, kudos to Plexxicon and Roche- for now. Don’t look over your shoulders, guys. Oncology R&D is very competitive right now and we’re all very busy. Bwahahahahahhhhhh!
A new paper in Nature uncovers the process of transcription from DNA to RNA in the cell:
The main way the genome is “read” in a cell is through its transcription into RNA, the researchers explained. Until now, scientists have been able to detect which RNAs were produced, but have had a limited view of how much of the genome was being decoded, or “transcribed,” or what controls how fast these RNAs are made. The new technique enables them to watch this process directly.
“This lets you capture the cell in the process of turning the DNA into RNA at unprecedented resolution,” said Jonathan S. Weissman, PhD, a professor in the UCSF Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and senior author on the paper. “Before, we were typically studying the end product. Now, we can directly watch how these RNA messages are produced in vivo.”
Who here is sick of all Palin all the time? Raise your hand. Yeah, me too. Neither side of the aisle will ever convince me they’re right. I’ve got my opinion, mercifully untainted by media spin. And like I have always said, you can’t get anything of value from cable news gasbags on TV going after each other. Turn them off. Once you do, you can form your own opinion without all that crap cluttering up your analytical thought processes. Let the right and left fight it out while you focus on more important things.
The Confluence 