Meanwhile, over at the “glibertarian”-baiting Balloon Juice blog, in a post defending NPR for firing Williams over insensitive comments, “business and economics editor” DougJ calls Williams a lawn jockey,with no apparent sense of irony. He later added a strike-through and changed the insult to stooge, but it’s clear from his responses in the comments thread (at least as of this writing) that he isn’t particularly apologetic about his initial choice of words.
More interesting, DougJ’s post defends NPR’s actions not just because of Williams’ comments about Muslims, but because in DougJ’s opinion, Williams’ political views are too conservative for Williams’ race and NPR affiliation, thus giving black-guy-from-NPR-approved cover for the Fox News hate machine.* Hence, “lawn jockey.”
Which brings me to the Clarence Thomas Rule.* It goes something like this: When a black person expresses views that liberal elites have deemed unacceptable for black people to hold, it is permissible for good liberals to respond by implying that said black person is either too stupid or too corrupt to think for himself, and to then call that black person racist names. In fact, not only are both responses permissible and not racist, they are a recommended way of displaying your open-mindedness.
Michael Kwiatkowski’s recent post on dumping Obama appeared here and at FDL’s Seminal. In it, he took shots at Jane Hamsher and the Seminal for being openly hostile to organizing a progressive alternative to the Democrats. As someone who was long at FDL, I can say those shots are accurate. When I tried to push the formation of such organizing there a couple of years ago, I was told “Can’t do that now. It’s more important to elect Obama.” Later I got hit with the line, “Go out, organize a third party, start winning elections, and then and only then, we will think about coming on board, and helping you, errr, organize.” Yes, that is completely contradictory. If I and others were successful in organizing a progressive party, why would we need FDL later? But the intention was clear, to fob off those who wanted to organize a third party and make it clear that FDL’s resources would not used to those ends. (emphasis added)
Mandos the Troll was saying something over at Ian Welsh’s place recently about “You have no power until you can win an election” or some such horseshit. He was wrong, as usual.
Requiring a third party to win elections to be considered relevant is an unfairly high threshold. It’s also a virtually impossible task, beyond a few local races.
Here in my little piece of paradise (CA-18) the last contested general election was in 2006 and there were 108,713 votes cast. That means in order to win a candidate would need at least 54,357 votes. That’s asking a lot for a start-up party.
On the other hand, back in 2008 Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate by a measly margin of 225 votes. Are you starting to catch my drift?
In the whole state of Minnesota a group of only 226 people could have swung the election to Norm Coleman. Now imagine you’re a group of lefties in Minneapolis with a membership of 1000 people.
Do you think the Honorable Mr. Franken will take you for granted? Not if you don’t let him he sure won’t.
All we need is a group large enough to swing elections. A group that is vocal and adamant that they will not vote for the lesser of two evils.
We didn’t start the fire but we wouldn’t mind being downwind of one of the biggest marijuana bonfires the world has ever known. 134 tons of confiscated weed were set ablaze in Mexico yesterday. We’re a little puzzled over the draconian steps to eradicate the pot before it makes its way across the border. What this country needs right now is some tasty weed or a batch of brownies. What a waste.
New Jersey Cablevision customers are downwind of a nasty dispute between their cable provider and News Corp, the company that shoves Fox down our throats. For the last 5 days, Cablevision customers have been without Fox programming including Glee, House, and some major league baseball and football games. I can’t find any evidence that Fox News was pulled, however, which is a shame. News Corp is doubling the subscription fees for retransmission of Fox programming for Cablevision. That’s $150,000,000 for Cablevision alone. It looks like Cablevision customers who just get the broadband service were also affected. They were unable to download programming from Hulu for a period of time but that seems to be restored.
News Corp is going up against Dish at the end of the month. As a Dish customer, I’d like to encourage management to take a hard line with News Corp. Take it all off the Dish lineup, including Fox News. It’s extortion but maybe this latest move is a good thing. The more we can contain the Fox News contagion, the better. I’ll download Glee from iTunes. But more than that, this is just another example of a corporation thinking that the average Joe has unlimited disposable income. We don’t. The fees for every damn little thing are skyrocketing. Enough already. Try to make due with the billions you already have.
On the mortgages/foreclosure fiasco, the rule of law appears to be downwind of some very sketchy bank tactics for seizing what might not be theirs and throwing families out of their houses. Atrios has been doing a really good job finding more and more evidence of bankster fraud. In the latest article on the mess, Battle Lines Forming in Clash over Foreclosures, the New York Times reports:
Now those missing and possibly fraudulent documents are at the center of a potentially seismic legal clash that pits big lenders against homeowners and their advocates concerned that the lenders’ rush to foreclose flouts private property rights.
That clash — expected to be played out in courtrooms across the country and scrutinized by law enforcement officials investigating possible wrongdoing by big lenders — leaped to the forefront of the mortgage crisis this week as big lenders began lifting their freezes on foreclosures and insisted the worst was behind them.
Federal officials meeting in Washington on Wednesday indicated that a government review of the problems would not be complete until the end of the year.
…
“The misbehavior is clear: they lied to the courts,” she said. “The fact that they are saying no one was harmed, they are missing the point. They did actual harm to the court system, to the rule of law. We don’t say, ‘You can perjure yourself on the stand because the jury will come to the right verdict anyway.’ That’s what they are saying.”
Robert Willens, a tax expert, said that documentation issues had created potentially severe tax problems for investors in mortgage securities and that “there is enough of a question here that the courts might well have to resolve the issue.”
Ah, yes, the poor investor will have to sort through all of the tax issues. So sad. It’s so much worse for investors than the families that lose everything including the roof over their heads just because the documentation is screwed up. I guess it never occurred to anyone that lowering the principle on some of the loans would allow some homeowners to stay in their houses and pay their mortgages. At least the investors would get *something* for their investments. Or investors could take it up with the banks who always seem to be in the middle of all these messes. But banks seem to make money off of of foreclosures. Hmmm, if I had been a congressman, I might have made foreclosure a lot less attractive for banks and avoided much of this mess. Oh, well! Not my problem.
It does appear to be a problem for those congresspersons, however, who appear to be downwind of voter anger over Congress’s complacency with the economy. In A National Election, Like it or Not, E.J. Dionne reports on the experience of Democratic Congresswoman Mary Jo Kilroy from Ohio, who mistakenly keeps trying to tell her voters about the “accomplishments” of the last two years. For some stupid reason, the voters aren’t paying any attention to the half assed Lily Ledbetter law or Health Care Reform or the financial bailout:
Kilroy recalls encountering a voter who told her: “I’ve voted for you throughout your career, but I’m not voting for you this year because I don’t have a job.”
She spoke to her constituent about what Congress had accomplished, and also about how the tied-up-in-knots U.S. Senate had blocked other House initiatives.
To which the voter replied: “Do you think I care they’re stuck in the Senate? I don’t have a job.”
Stivers, who lost to Kilroy in 2008 by just 2,312 votes, has had much happier doorstep experiences. “People were mad at George Bush two years ago and they were going to take it out on anyone with an ‘R’ after their name,” he said. This time, they’re eager to talk about — you guessed it — “the debt and jobs.”
But still, the enthusiasm deficit remains enormous, even though Dems have tried everything to turn this around: They’ve chanted Bush’s name in unison for months. They’ve raised the specter of foreign money rigging our elections. They’ve floated the possibility of GOP investigations that will make the 1990s look like a latter-day Era of Good Feelings. And they’ve relentlessly elevated the craziest of Tea Party crazies to iconic status. Yet Dems still aren’t goosed up about this election in anywhere near the numbers they need to be — mainly because the GOP enthusiasm levels are essentially steroidal at this point.
It’s like that Far Side cartoon where Einstein can’t figure out the famous relativity equation until his cleaning lady starts straightening up his desk. “All squared away” The Democrats have tried everything but the stuff that actually works. Denigrating the stupid hicks who join the Tea Party doesn’t work, Greg. And I know a lot of Democrats don’t want to hear this but if the closest you’re going to get to having a liberal in the White House is Hillary Clinton, then you might just want to elect Hillary Clinton. There’s no way in God’s green earth that Kucinich is ever going to get there. Get squared away already.
Here’s a hint, Mary Jo and all you Democratic Congresspeople: Congress didn’t do enough for the working class. The best you can do is say, “I’m sorry. I get it now. I’ll put pressure on Obama to kill the Catfood Commission. Please don’t vote for Republicans. They’ll only make it worse, er, faster than we will.”
Ed Potosnak can balance an equation and gets my vote.
And that goes for all the rest of you Democrats sending stupid emails to me, assuming I’m some low information, irrationally angry voter who doesn’t know what the heck is going on. The destruction that ongoing layoffs have had on my friends and family is devastating. I really don’t want to hear about some half assed health care reform bill or some lame Ledbetter bill that doesn’t guarantee me equal pay- now, this very moment without any legal hassles. I want to hear about how you’re going to save my retirement and my job. I guess it’s just irrational to want to be able to maintain my base caloric and shelter requirements. As it happens, I have a Democrat , Ed Potasnak, to vote for this November but I’m not supporting a party that seems incapable of getting its act together when it had every possible advantage in the past two years.
And finally, Juan Williams is downwind of someone at NPR who has some scruples. Last night, NPR fired him. After years of being the not-so-secret conservative mole at NPR, Juan finally took things too far on his other gig at Fox:
NPR has terminated its contract with Juan Williams, one of its senior news analysts, after he made comments about Muslims on the Fox News Channel.
NPR said in a statement that it gave Mr. Williams notice of his termination on Wednesday night.
The move came after Mr. Williams, who is also a Fox News political analyst, appeared on the “The O’Reilly Factor” on Monday. On the show, the host, Bill O’Reilly, asked him to respond to the notion that the United States was facing a “Muslim dilemma.” Mr. O’Reilly said, “The cold truth is that in the world today jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet.”
Mr. Williams said he concurred with Mr. O’Reilly.
He continued: “I mean, look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
I’ve been disappointed with NPR since the Bush administration when it went from National Public Radio to Nice Polite Republicans. The consensus reality/perception bending by Williams, Mara Liason and Steve Inskeep got to be too much for me to take in the mornings. It was nauseating to hear it on the program I had listened to faithfully since I was in college. I’m glad that Williams got the boot because his remarks were designed to mislead viewers like my mother into believing that Muslims are going to go all jihad on helpless Americans. The purpose of those remarks are to terrify people who will short circuit their risk assessment thought processes. And studies have shown (damn, where is that reference?) that voters who are fearful of their own mortality will vote for conservative politicians who promise to protect them. Those viewers of Juan Williams on Fox will not think about how most Muslim Americans have families and jobs and don’t have time to do terrorist activities. They’ve got PTA meetings and shopping to do. Besides, they’re so small in number, how the heck are they going to get away? It’s a big country. Don’t get me started. I have to deprogram my mom of this stuff every time I see her.
Yeah, Juan Williams is one of the bad guys and he’s been sitting on NPR like some big ugly insect that the NPR listeners are just supposed to ignore. We’re supposed to believe that Williams was an unbiased journalist who just coincidentally has this other job on Fox News where he’s allowed to spew nonsense and deceive people. But none of that could ever possibly spill over into Morning Edition. Riiiiight.
Now, get rid of Liason and Inskeep and I’ll come back. Maybe I’ll even write a check.
The Confluence 