The New York Times Opinionator blog aggregator has detected a nascent revolt in the Democratic party. The Times is only 18 months late. The PUMAs were ahead of the curve the day the DNC RBC knifed its own voters and installed Barack Obama as the nominee over the objections of slightly more than half of the Democratic primary voters. I’ll get back to why this moment was important. The Opinionator follows up on this week’s off-off-year election results and reports that it appears that the Democrats are losing their far left flank.
(First, they came for the so-called “Reagan Democrats”, then they came for the women and the gays.)
Can I just say what a stupid narrative this is? Sometimes, I read this crap in the paper and I think, do these reporters just take dictation from Rahm Emannuel or do they make this $^&* up to conform to their view of the world where things have to go into neat little boxes?
What the hell is the far-left anyway? If you believe that equal treatment under the law should apply to all citizens regardless of gender, marital status, sexual orientation, age, race, creed or disability because they are all persons born with unalienable rights, that is hardly a “far left” position. Isn’t that a uniquely American position? Didn’t we all pledge allegiance to the flag that promised “liberty and justice for all”? And if that is true, doesn’t that put us on the side of everything that is good about America and those that oppose those things horribly mislead?
My idea of “far-left” is based on my childhood impressions of news reports of the Weather Underground and defenders of Karl Marx. Far lefties, to me, are people who are rigid ideologues who want to enforce some strange form of a socialist utopian nanny state on the rest of us. And I am referring to a REAL communist-socialist state, not some bizarre Republican misinterpretation of one. Far lefties are militant pacifists. They hang out in trees and feed their children macrobiotic organic fruititarian diets. They are green Martha Stewart’s who think everyone has time to grow their own clothes and walk to work. They’re people who can’t be reasoned with. They’re oblivious to real life and are as fundamentalist in their world view as the religious right.
The closest I can find to a far-lefty these days is the Obot who still thinks that the main problem plaguing the country right now is the issue of race. Where have these people been in the last year? Did they miss that sincerely awe inspiring election of the first African-American for president? Don’t they know what the unemployment rate is? Have they tried to find jobs lately? Feed their kids? Pay for a doctor? Save for college? They’re stuck with the mindset that we are not finished with their teachable moment on race as if all other oppressed demographic groups don’t have grievances that need to be addressed. If only we would let go of our prejudices, which for the most part do not exist on the center-left, President Obama could get on with his job and we’ll all be happier. Anyone who opposes Obama doesn’t have a legitimate reason for doing so. They’re just racists or stupid old women. That’s the far-left. They are so stuck in the weeds of their own perfect world they are incapable of seeing the floor torn out from beneath their feet by the big business friends of Obama who installed him in office.
Let’s talk about those big business friends of Obama. They were in control of the primary and general election season last year. I think we can all see that in retrospect. Raise your hand if that isn’t perfectly clear to you by now. Their massive infusions of cash bought the Democratic National Committee, which unbeknownst to the average voter was up for sale. The Democratic National Committee violated just about every principle it stood for in order to install Obama as the nominee including dumping millions of Hillary Clinton’s voters. I’m going to keep harping on this until the Times boys get it. The party dumped its base last year. That is why there is trouble brewing in the party. Some of us have left the party over what happened last year. You just didn’t see it in the presidential election because the economy tanked.
Apparently, that “some of us” made the difference in NJ. It isn’t that there were so many more voters voting Republican in NJ. There weren’t. It’s that Democrats just didn’t turn out or that the truly disgusted ones, such as myself, voted for a fiscally responsible, socially liberal Chris Daggett. Now, some may argue that Corzine lost due to local issues. And that is true. But the reason he was such a failure at resolving local issues is because he is typical of the kind of Democratic politician we’ve become accustomed to voting for in the Democratic party. He is beholden to the status quo and big money, a compromiser, an incrementalist, insufficiently bold, doesn’t look out for the middle class and all too willing to ignore the voters when their will is inconvenient to him.
Who does that sound like?
The party has lost its way and now that enough of its voters know that the party is no longer listening to them, there have been defections. And let’s not mistake who the defectors are. Most of us are FDR, Clinton style Democrats, moderate to liberal but hardly “far-left”. We’re in Paul Krugman’s camp. Recently, some of the feminist Obama supporters have woken up and smelled the coffee. We welcome them and only regret that they weren’t paying attention last year when references to abortion and reproductive rights were scrubbed from Democratic candidates web sites. (Read past the quote) They ridiculed the PUMAs last year. They’re starting to sound just like them now. Gay voters have been wary of Obama since he rolled out Donny McClurkin but many fell prey to the “Obama is an historic candidate but Hillary Clinton is an old bitch” propaganda. Do they now regret their over the top rants against her? Is it possible that she was just a legitimate candidate who stood for traditional core Democratic principles and was not sent by Satan to rain on Barack Obama’s glorious golden specialness? Is it possible that her supporters deserved to be treated like persons and their votes respected?
The party’s civil war started the day the RBC tossed our votes out, May 31, 2008. The day they made one candidate’s voters more equal than the others, the day they violated every principle they had over voting rights, the day they selectively broke and enforced their rules and decided to not listen to their voters, and got away with it, was the day the party started down the path to disunity. It only took some time before the Obama cheerleaders realized that they had given the party permission to completely ignore them in the future. And now the party should not be surprised that they have a civil war on their hands.
Bring. It. On.
Please digg!!! tweet!!! share!!!
Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine
Filed under: Democratic Party, LGBT rights, Liberalism, NJ Governor's race 2009 | Tagged: Civil War, Democratic Prty, Equality, gay marriage initiatives, race, reproductive rights, Voting Rights | 194 Comments »