• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Beata on Once they’re in, you can’t vot…
    Beata on “Pet Peeves”
    Beata on “Pet Peeves”
    Propertius on Once they’re in, you can’t vot…
    William on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    HerStory Repeating on Once they’re in, you can’t vot…
    Beata on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    William on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    Beata on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    jmac on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    Beata on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    jmac on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    William on The Welcome Escape of a M…
    Propertius on “Pet Peeves”
    MAG on “Pet Peeves”
  • Categories


  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    January 2022
    S M T W T F S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • What Sheldon said
      A Supreme Court code of ethics is an absolute no-brainer. Since the justices won’t address the problem, here’s a solution: Congress can pass my Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act. It’s clearly time. — Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) September 28, 2022
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The Attacks On Nord Stream I & II
      Let’s point out the obvious. Russia had no reason to attack its own pipelines. If it doesn’t want gas to go thru them it just turns off the tap. Sabotage to the pipelines weakens Russia’s position, since it will be months before they can offer to turn fuel back on, which they would have wanted to offer during the winter in order to pressure Germany in specif […]
  • Top Posts

Defining “Freedom”

I read a comment today, “Still boggles my mind that the people who hate being told what to do, want an authoritarian government.”

Well, obviously, that is generalizing, but it seems like pretty accurate and powerful generalizing to me. More than I can ever remember, we are besieged by people going berserk about not wanting to listen to anyone who tells them that they should be vaccinated, and wear a mask; and about a variety of other things. They love to use the word “freedom” to validate their absolute refusal to listen to medical evidence, and scientific data. Not just about Covid, though that is paramount. About global warming, about gun violence, about safety laws. “Don’t tell me what to do!” is their most important expression of being.

But yet most such people, I would say over 90%, are avid supporters of Donald Trump. Trump is an absolute authoritarian, a would-be dictator. From calling the media “the enemy of the people,” to lying about every fact, to urging his supporters to beat up protesters at his rallies, to his lavish praise of dictators of other countries, to trying to overthrow the newly elected government of America, every single thing he does screams out that he wants to be a tyrant, and already is, as far as he can get away with it.

His acolytes, including people like DeSantis, Abbott, now Youngkin, are busily trying to enact an agenda which not only ignores medical evidence on Covid, but bans any book which they don’t like from being taught. They encourage vigilantes to report teachers who say anything which they might disagree with. In Texas, the absolute exemplification of “no government is going to tell us what to do,” they are trying to make every abortion illegal, and to encourage people to turn in and sue anyone whom they claim had any part in providing an abortion.

So how does one make sense of this psychologically? Well, “many people are stupid, and many are illogical, and most of them are both,” might cover most of it. Riverdaughter has very helpfully described something which I had not previously heard of as a scientifically named disorder, but which seems very accurate to me: Oppositional Defiance Disorder. I have not delved into the literature on it, but it would seem to connote a psychological need of some people to vehemently disagree with and fight against anyone or anything who even suggests what they should do. As if their entire identity rests on being able to scream “No!” at any statement which would imply that the person saying it knew more than the person who had ODD.

Does this come from having had cruel or authoritarian parents? Probably not in most cases, though it would explain it in those that did. What makes someone so absolutely intransigent about not accepting or following thoughts or suggestions or rules coming from someone else, or some body, no matter how knowledgeable or experienced or explanatory they might be? Does it even matter at this point? We are not talking about a few hundred members of a cult, even a dangerous one. We are looking at millions of Americans who behave as if being vaccinated is the worst thing that could happen to them, an obscene assault upon their body and psyche.

And yet, these people who continually use the word “freedom” to describe their position, continue to support people who want to tell everyone else what to do: to forbid them to have an abortion under any circumstances; to not read or learn about this or that book; to not say anything against the totalitarian leader; to not express any position contrary to their own.

Many of them threaten extreme violence against anyone who ever says anything against Trump, or any of their other authoritarian heroes. These were people who wanted to kill Whitmer and Pelosi and Pence, and all those many people whom they threaten on social media, including those who just want to help out by working at polling places. “Do what we want, or die,” is what these self-described fighters for freedom are saying over and over.

We all know of Nat Hentoff’s book, “Free Speech for Me, but Not for Thee.” Is it as simple as that? There are people on the Left who also fall into that hypocrisy. But what is going on in with the Right is far more than just inconsistency. In fact, one could view it as a variation of the attitudes of all those people in history who have supported tyranny; they always see it as a battle between “good” (the tyrant and his followers) and “evil” (anyone who does not submit to him). This can be portrayed in religious terms, or devotion to secular tyrants, or obedience to a cult leader. It is not new in that sense. But in America, where “freedom” is such a powerful emotional image, it seems to be some horrifying mutation, where “liberty” is actually offered as the rationale for fascism.

Historians and psychologists will have much to try to analyze. How did the modern birthplace of democracy get filled with so many people who hate democracy in its classic definition? Is it just a convenient shield to carry into battle for tyranny? Or are these people so psychologically twisted that they actually believe that wanting to kill everyone who disagrees with them is a manifestation of liberty? Is the liberty always only just for them?

Directly put, it seems that these millions, tens of millions, of people want no one to ever tell them what to do (unless it is the authoritarian calling them into battle under the false flag of freedom), but they want to tell everybody else what to do at every moment of their day. The medieval church did that; the potentates and tyrants and their subordinates did; but I don’t know any historical precedent for it being cloaked under the name of “freedom and liberty.” I doubt that this was carefully planned out, but it is certain that the people who have been employing it have rejoiced in how effective it is.

Note that there is this weird affinity for Russia and other totalitarian regimes, among these people who keep declaiming about freedom. This strange feat of psychological gymnastics is growing. Trump would bellow about being free and having rights, while praising the most oppressive and freedom-hating tyrants. “Slavery is Freedom”? Bannon is an absolute fascist who would have had a place in Nazi Germany, and who keeps talking about fighting for liberty.

It may be an insidious technique of demagogue tyrants. It may be a manifestation of how their minds are twisted. It is a strange thing to behold, even comparing it to history. Our side needs to do some stronger proselytizing about freedom, since the word has such a powerful resonance to most Americans.

Freedom to drive your car 150 mph. is actually tyranny over everybody else who might be in the way of your death weapon. Freedom to flaunt your guns is tyranny by terror. Freedom to go around with no vaccination and no mask takes away everyone else’s freedom. The freedom in America is meant to be collective freedom. Is a murderer exercising his freedom when he kills other people? Is the bully who kicks your child in the stomach simply expressing his free right to do what he wants?

Freedom is the right of all people to live in relative safety and comfort. No one will force you to get vaccinated, but the rest of the people who value that medical advice, have the right to protect themselves from you, by not letting you go to the workplace, or be on a plane or in a classroom. Freedom is not another word for extreme selfishness or egotism, where what you want is forced upon everyone else. That perversion of the concept of “freedom” would send us back to the “jungle,” Hobbes’ depiction of “the war of all against all.”

11 Responses

  1. In that last paragraph I was waiting for you to channel Janis

    Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose
    Nothin’, don’t mean nothin’, honey, if it ain’t free

    • I remember that song well, it evoked a time and place, and a different connotation of freedom than we are hearing now.

  2. Definition of freedom for conservatives is I get to do what I want to do and everybody else has to do what I tell them to do.

    • And they don’t even see a bit of hypocrisy or contradiction in that, which really is the biggest problem, they will never change, or feel any moral need to do so.

    • That is, basically, the aristocratic definition of freedom–which means only a few people can be free. The rest of us must be serfs of one degree or another.

      That’s what we get for letting some watery tart hand out swords to dudes, who then start thinking they are da shizzit. How would any of you like it if some moistened bint heaved a scimitar at me, and I started going around calling myself an emperor? 😛

  3. OFF TOPIC:

    Bummer… WORDLE purchased by the NY Times. They claim it will NOT be behind the paywall, and they will keep all the current statistics, but seeing as how my faith in the NYT has been thoroughly shaken I have my dobts.

    • Yes, they did not buy it for no purpose, they paid “in the low seven figures,” they said. it is a shame, but everything seems to get monetized, and one can’t blame the inventors for taking the money–but it was nice that apparently millions of people were sharing the game, and it didn’t cost them anything. As for the NYT, i have been so disappointed in what they have turned into since Dean Bacquet has been the editor. They literally got Trump elected with their deliberately false headlines and stories, and they are still taking the Republican position on most things.

      • More precisely, they are taking the Leona Helmsley position: Taxes are for the little people. The owners, managers, and higher-ranking staffers of the So-Called Liberal Media are wealthy enough that if the Democrats ever got full control of the Federal Government, the taxes of the SCLM personnel might rise–and the average non-poor white American is the loudest, whiniest crybaby on the planet Earth about paying taxes.

        • YEP… GREED is the highest virtue among Americans these days, and crosses political boundaries easily.

  4. I believe Oppositional Defiance Disorder used to be called “being a horse’s @$$.” 😈

    • Yes, just think how the psychology books would read if the chapters were titled like that! Sometimes the humanism in the social sciences actually is kinder to the jerks than they deserve.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: