• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    William on Do Political Polls Have Value?…
    jmac on Do Political Polls Have Value?…
    riverdaughter on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Beata on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Propertius on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Propertius on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Beata on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    William on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    riverdaughter on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    thewizardofroz on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Beata on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    Beata on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    thewizardofroz on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
    thewizardofroz on OMFG, we needed a Jaime Lannis…
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    July 2021
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The Lack of Belief In Good
      Are humans good, bad or neutral? It’s an old philosophical debate, and not just in the West. Confucius thought they were born neutral, for example, while the later Confucian Mencius felt they were good, noting that everyone who saw a child fall into a well would be horrified. Others, including many Confucians and the Christian church, with original sin, have […]
  • Top Posts

Republicans, please don’t help #freebritney

The more that comes out about Britney Spears’ conservatorship, the more Kafkaesque her dilemma appears to be. I can’t understand how it is that we can completely strip an adult American citizen of all civil rights, especially a high functioning, hard working adult who appears to have been put under this arrangement fraudulently. How did conservatorships fly under the radar??

Senators Liz Warren and Bob Casey are investigating the problem and have requested data from HHS and SEC to understand the nature and scope of the conservatorships in each state. That seems logical. Understand the problem before proposing solutions. The biggest problem so far appears to be that state appointed conservators, whether they are family members or guardians, have a conflict of interest in ensuring that the conservatorship continues indefinitely, allowing them to “isolate, medicate and liquidate” the conservatee’s assets.

This is what is happening to Britney. Her father, Jamie, was in control of her person and from 2008-2019 and now is the single conservator of her estate. He controls every aspect of her life because he controls all of her money. Britney was assigned a lawyer by the court who was supposed to represent her. He was paid $10K a week to make sure her best interests were served. He never told her that she had the right to petition the court to end the conservatorship. You figure that one out.

In all this time, Britney has not been able to choose her own lawyer. The court said she lacked capacity to do so. A couple of weeks ago, this changed. All the sunlight on her case lately seems to have had an impact on the judge in this case who suddenly realized that there was never a finding of incapacity filed for Britney in 2008. Imagine that! How did THAT sneak by the first judge who put Britney under her father’s thumb forever? The conservatorship has been “voluntary”. Again, no one told Britney. Her court appointed lawyer promptly resigned when this happened and the lawyer she picked, Matt Rosengart, got right to work. First thing he did was petition the court to remove Jamie Spears from being a conservator of Britney’s person and estate. It’s a sort of “starve the beast” maneuver. The motion is pending a September 29 hearing. That should be a biggie.

The amount of money in her estate has been called “shockingly low” by Forbes magazine. In the past 13 years, she’s been earning hundreds of millions of dollars from her tours and Vegas residency. But her estate is still the same $60 million that she started with in 2008. Where is the money she earned since 2008? Well, some of it has been used to pay the conservators, Jamie’s expensive lawyers, the business manager that Jamie chose, the talent manager that Jamie chose, Jamie’s personal PR team, the security team that Jamie hired for himself and the stasi security team he hired to form Britney’s domestic panopticon.

There are cameras in her house watching everything she does. Think about that.

Anyway, Republicans have heard her cry. Matt Gaetz has been slinking around the free Britney movement. I guess no one told him Britney is too old for him. And Republican Nancy Mace, has introduced the Free Britney Act. Wait, it’s been shortened to just the Free Act. It looks like Charlie Crist has signed on to it. Florida strikes again. His involvement probably has something to do with the large number of elderly conservatees in Florida but their condition is vastly different from Britney’s. They’re really apples and oranges. Whatever is written for elderly people with dementia who may be vulnerable to undue influence will not apply to a high profile, young, competent, hard working, high earning pop star whose family was annoyed with her cutting them out of her business life.

Did you notice that “Free” had to be in there somewhere? Somebody please give Republicans as thesaurus.

Maybe they need a dictionary instead. The title of the bill is Orwellian. There is nothing in the bill that would help free a conservatee who shouldn’t be in a conservatorship from a conservatorship. No. All this bill does is allow the conservatee to request a different state appointed guardian. The conservatee would also get a state case workerhu. This caseworker would be paid from a pool of money granted by the federal government based on the number of conservatorships in the state. If the youtube legal Eagles are reading this bill correctly, the impact would be that more conservatorships would be created because the cut of the grant to the states would be directly proportional to the number of conservatees in that state. Way to go, Republican thought experimenters!

There is no provision for the conservatee to petition the court to get out of the conservatorship. These arrangements are notoriously difficult to get free from as Britney’s case has shown. The conservatee literally has no civil rights. They have the legal standing of minor children. An accused ax murderer has more rights than Britney right now. Crist and Mace’s bill does nothing to change this. The conservatee would have the right to petition the court for a new guardian but the court would still be the entity who chooses the guardian. There would be a caseworker assigned to the conservatorship as well. The caseworkers would come from a pool of state appointed caseworkers who would be paid according to the share of money the state has been granted for this purpose and according to the number of conservatees in the state. The caseworker would be tasked with reviewing the conservatorship and submitting reports. But conservatorships like Britney’s are already reviewed on an annual basis and up until recently, her reports of conservatorship personhood and estate abuse have been ignored by the court.

So, the Republican Free Act would do nothing of the sort for the conservatee. It would just give the conservatee the right to replace the ruthless and greedy family conservator she knows with a possibly equally ruthless and greedy conservator she doesn’t know. Did I mention there is no accountability or penalties in this bill? Why should we be surprised. Oversight smacks of regulation and Republicans don’t tend to write bills that have provisions for accountability. We will just have to rely on the goodness of the conservators’ hearts and their incorruptibility in the face of so much money.

You may be wondering why the Governor of California, Democrat Gavin Newsome, hasn’t stepped in and freed Britney himself. Isn’t this all his fault?? I’ve actually heard this accusation in the comments sections. It’s not clear to me that the Governor has any role to play in this matter and probably wouldn’t get involved anyway until the full extent of the fraud is known. The ACLU has filed briefs on behalf of Britney for the violation of her civil rights. But I’m guessing that now that there’s a media frenzy and the court has finally started to look into its own culpability, the conservatorship will likely end soon. Like in a matter of months. Probably not soon enough for Britney but there’s no way this can go on now that everyone knows how badly she’s been screwed by her conservators and their lawyers and how her money has been squandered with the court’s permission.

As for whether it was all Gavin Newsome’s fault to begin with, this would be incorrect. The Spears conservatorship was created in 2008 when Republican Arnold Schwartzeneggar was a two term Governor. So, you know… there’s that. Not that he was personally involved or anything but someone should probably look into how the probate court judges and the chummy conservator lawyers are appointed or were appointed back then. It looks like a racket.

5 Responses

  1. I admit that I have not been that aware of the Britney Spears situation, probably because I was never a fan of her music, nor the entire musical period which gave rise to that kind of music. But reading your pieces, I see what a terrible thing this is, like out of some gothic movie; the woman put in the asylum by, or under the control of, an evil and greedy person or family. It is always upsetting to see once again how cruel and selfish some people can be, even to their own family members. And as to the Republicans, they are always only about trying to score political gains by making up a cause. The fact that they want to blame Newsom, shows what this is about for them.

    • It’s commenters in various social media platforms that are whining that Newsome should do something. Why doesn’t he do something???
      Oh, yeah, this is a big time horrific situation she is in. You should follow it. It will make your hair curl. I wasn’t a big Spears fan either though I love some of her videos. Just for the heck of it you should check out her Circus video or her Work video. That work video takes on a whole new meaning now. Circus was released in 2008 and work a few years afterwards. She sure as f}#% doesn’t look or perform like she has dementia. Then go look at her Las Vegas residency videos. Them finally check out her domination rehearsal videos where she is teaching her dancers choreography. That was in 2019. This is a fully competent, very hard working adult who was earning hundreds of millions of dollars for everyone but herself.

    • Forgot to mention that she’s not allowed to own her own phone, drive her own car or use a credit card. Her diet is strictly controlled and her father has to approve every penny she spends.
      He also makes artistic decisions about her performances, decides what kind of makeup and costume she wears, what music she uses and what dance moves she’s supposed to perform. He decides on her hair as well. And if she isn’t cooperative, he withholds access to her kids and can throw her into a mental health program. He can make sure she takes drugs to make her more compliant.
      If he wanted to, he could sell her house from under her without asking her permission and make her live in a trailer. He makes all the arrangements with contracts. She is not allowed to object to how he’s arranged them. Her job is to show up, do what she’s told and rake in the bucks for him and his buddies. There has been some documentation that suggests that her former business manager offshored some of her money. For sure it’s not in the estate Britney set up for her kids when they were born. That estate is the one valued at $60 million but no one in the entertainment industry buys that number. She should be making about as much as Beyoncé. So where’s the money? Oh, and her dad made her younger sister Jamie Lynn a trustee of her estate. It just gets worser and worser.
      As far as anyone knows, there was never a finding of dementia or incapacity for Britney. They whole thing was set up very quickly and she was not informed by her court appointed lawyer that any of it was happening.

  2. Anyway, Republicans have heard her cry. Matt Gaetz has been slinking around the free Britney movement. I guess no one told him Britney is too old for him.

    But I’m sure some of her younger fans aren’t.

  3. I hope this is plastered all over the social media to the point where Jamie Spears can’t go anywhere without being hissed, booed, and refused service.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: