• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on “Pet Peeves”
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Upon a painted ocean
    Propertius on A Very Good Day
    Propertius on “Pet Peeves”
    alibe50 on Upon a painted ocean
    alibe50 on And we’re off
    riverdaughter on Upon a painted ocean
    William on A Very Good Day
    William on A Very Good Day
    Beata on A Very Good Day
    Beata on A Very Good Day
    Beata on A Very Good Day
    MsMass on Upon a painted ocean
    William on Once More Into the Breach
    William on Upon a painted ocean
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    March 2021
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Open Thread
      Use to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts. (No Ukraine, in other words.) Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn
  • Top Posts

I figured out the Royal problem

Maybe this isn’t important to anyone here. It took me a few days to marinate on the Harry, Meghan interview. Here’s what I’ve got:

Charles is a narcissistic parent, William is the Golden child (literally), Harry was supposed to be the scapegoat but he refused to play along, Charles retaliated and essentially disinherited him, the tabloids are flying monkeys, Meghan is the proxy scapegoat and collateral damage. Classic narcissistic family dynamics.

Don’t believe me? Check out the narcissistic family roles with Dr. Ramani.

Does Charles have NPD? I dunno. I’m not a shrink. But I’ve seen enough to know he’s the narc in the family and he’s on the high side of the scale.

This is what makes him unsuitable to be the next king and why the Queen doesn’t retire even at the age of 94. The Queen’s role is to be self-effacing. She sacrificed her personality to become Britain. Charles is anything but self-effacing.

It’s a problem.

Anyway, that’s my take. Discuss. Or not. I just think we need a break from politics every now and then.

One more thing: since a narcissist is shallow, seeks attention and praise, and is all about protecting his image, Charles may have become more than a little perturbed that Archie would physically resemble him least of all his grandchildren.

Charles made the racist remark.