• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    riverdaughter on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Propertius on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Ga6thDem on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Propertius on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Propertius on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Propertius on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    riverdaughter on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    William on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    William on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    riverdaughter on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    jmac on Happy MLK Day from Canada
    Seagrl on Engrossment
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Engrossment
    Kathleen A Wynne on Engrossment
    William on Engrossment
  • Categories


  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    September 2019
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug   Oct »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The NYTimes Reveals More Than It Means
      Watch this video. It’s only 39 seconds. It’s worth it. What’s interesting to me about this video is NOT what Bernie says, it’s the reaction. It’s how genuinely uncomfortable the people interviewing him (The NYTimes editors) are. They really think he’s saying something terrible. Something awkward. Something embarrassing. What is he saying? “I ignore the […] […]
  • Top Posts

The SHTF Scenario for Trump

He went too far. He got cocky and careless. The House Intel Committee is questioning the acting DNI. You can watch it here.

I have to work so take good notes.

Meanwhile, the Whistleblower complaint says that the actual meeting log between Trump and Zelensky is stored on a secure server for political reasons. Let’s hope someone from the NSA has hacked into it before the WH person with the su password wipes the thing clean.

This is an open SHTF thread:

Things that make you go “hmmm…”, Explosive Edition

So, Rep. Jackie Speier was on Rachel Maddow last night and Maddow asked her if she’d read the whistleblower complaint. Yes, she had. Well, some documentation has been classified retroactively by the president in the last 24 hours so she couldn’t talk about it. But did she have an opinion about the contents?

Yes. It was “explosive”.

Interesting choice of words.

Let’s read into this word as if Speier were trying to blink out a message. (Put your tin foil hats on)

What if the whistleblower (wb) found out that Trump “promised” to deliver something even better than $250,000,000 in military aid to Ukraine? What if Trump promised one of our nukes?

Maybe he thought that would sweeten the pot since Ukraine disarmed years ago and didn’t have one around. I know it sounds crass to offer something associated with radiation to a country that hosted Chernobyl on its soil but this is Trump. He’s not the kind of guest you invite to dinner for his refinement and sensitivity.

Just the other day, Trump was going on and on about how we are upgrading our nuclear arsenal. What do you do with a huge, shiny nuclear arsenal? I mean, seriously, what’s the point of having nukes if you can never use them? Why not use them as a bargaining chip? Offer a nuke to Zelensky in exchange for making Biden look like a monster and watch the NYTimes go after Biden like Ramsay Bolton’s dogs.

Or why not get the Ukrainians to say that Biden offered them a nuke if he became president? Would that be execution worthy for Biden? Didn’t the Rosenbergs get the “electric chair” for giving the nuclear info to the soviets?

I’m not saying that nukes had anything to do with it. All I’m saying is that “explosive” could be a significant choice of words. There are many possibilities. I’m just letting my mind go where it wants.

You know, five impossible things before breakfast.

Comment below on your best “explosive” scenario.