Net neutrality- the principle that affirms that all internet traffic is equal and should be delivered by your ISP (internet service provider, usually your cable company) without interference. After all, you’re already paying for the access connection and Netflix, WordPress, pornhub (my friends use it). There is no reason for the cable company to interfere with your internet service that doesn’t smell suspiciously like a conflict of interest.
Net neutrality was recently suspended by the FCC, lead by Trump appointee Ajit Pai. That’s because when ISPs started complaining about how they were losing money to streaming services and an increasing number of people who cut the cord, they wanted to be able to introduce tiered pricing so that some internet traffic would be slower than others unless the service coughed up the extra dough to use the cable companies’ fiber. So Obama’s FCC voted to treat ISPs like utilities. And let’s face it, it *is* like a utility. Some kids born in the 90s have never used a phone book or have had to write directions on a piece of paper, go to a library to research a paper, or apply in person for a job. And those kids who do still do are at a severe disadvantage.
Given the vital nature of the internet, and the WHOPPING fees of corporate welfare we have paid over the last 25 years to get the cable companies to reluctantly and with great slowness install faster fiber optic cable in our neighborhoods, it’s a great insult to us as consumers that that cables want to restrict our internet access until we or the services we use cough up more money to them. As if 20 million channels of reality TV and Fox News that you didn’t want in your cable TV package isn’t bad enough. Think about that for a second. Every time you pay the TV portion of your cable bill, you are actually subsidizing the ability of Fox News to delude your neighbor or spouse until they turn into self contradictory, word salad spewing, judgmental, mean and unpleasant philosophical zombies.
Anyway, the cable companies have been very supportive of the Trump administration. And they got net neutrality rescinded. But some people out there of good will may still not understand what that means to them personally. So some clever people have created a nifty ad imagining what it would be like at a Burger King without whopper neutrality. I think the actors in this ad are volunteers who didn’t know what they signed up for. Anyway, their reactions seem genuine. The cable company customer support people are going to love their jobs soon
Now, how can the cable company make your ISP service more like a cable package? Well, let’s use the Whopper again as an example.
If you want everything on your whopper like double patties, extra cheese, lettuce, tomato, onions, mayo, ketchup and mustard, you can get it for $215/month, but you will need to rent the packaging and paper bag for another $21/month. But you will get everything.
What if you don’t want two patties because, just like reality TV, it’s bad for you. Or maybe you don’t want tomatoes because you are allergic to them. No problem! The cable company will have a number of packages for you to choose from. You can get the stripped down whopper without anything. That will be $125/month and package rental. But, you say, I just want a regular whopper. Ok, no problem, you can have that but it won’t come with a bun. Or you can get fries with a different package. But, you say, I’m already getting HBO Now fries on my iPhone at home. I don’t need it. Too bad, you need to pay for it twice. And extra for extra fries. See where I’m going? You’re never going to get ala cart where you can get the burger, ketchup but not mustard, and three orders or fries while using your own paper bag.
Isn’t this fun??
If this does NOT strike you as a good time had by all, you might want to contact your local hardass Republican Senator or Representative to tell them to cosponsor the bills going thru Congress now to enshrine net neutrality into law. Good luck with that!
November is Coming.

Filed under: General |






That (Whopper Neutrality) is hilarious… thanks
“[L]ead (sic) by Trump appointee Ajit Pai.”
Well, sort of. Pai was originally appointed to the commission by Obama (!) in 2012 on the recommendation of, wait for it, Mitch McConnell. Trump just made him chairman, but he was already on the commission (and voted against the net neutrality regulations back in 2014).
There’s plenty of corruption to go around.
If you’re looking for the actual deciding vote in the net neutrality fiasco, that would be Brendan Carr, whose appointment by Trump in June, 2017 swung the majority of the commission against net neutrality.
Trump appointed him as the chair or whatever the hell you call it. I’m not letting Obama’s off the hook here.
Don’t you think it’s interesting how so many left and liberal bloggers are starting to get Obama now that he’s gone? Like how he let Wall Street get away with murder, how he didn’t blow the whistle on Trump’s Russia ties, how he neglected the DNC to the point that it was $25 million in debt. He’s partially responsible for why we have trump. He catered to his class and ignored the working class, had his minions silence anyone who criticized him by calling us r@cists, and did not see the danger of Republicans flooding all those state legislatures so they could gerrymander the hell out of us.
THAT’S his legacy. Benign neglect. I think there are a lot of activists who are understanding that the mountain wouldn’t have been so steep if Obama had actually given a fuck.
The post-2010 redistricting was the result of the GOP wave in 2010. The 2010 election was held with essentially the same districts that resulted in a Democratic wave in 2006-2008.
You can thank Obamacare for the 2010 GOP wave.
FYI: Gerrymandering does not affect Senate or gubernatorial elections, and the GOP controls most of those seats too.
A lot of that benign neglect for me was that there was no peep about SCOTUS gutting voting rights act and no plan to ensure voting rights and fairness. Media made him and they protected him. He was their golden calf to the last day. He is young and he wanted to make it rich until and beyond his retirement. That would not happen if he fought with the very factions that would make him retire rich.
IMO Obama is FULLY responsible for why we have Trump… He was, and may still be an empty suit looking out for #1
If you don’t like the way Burger King does business, go to Mickey D’s.
Wow, you must live in The Land of Endless Choices.
Most of us have only 2 to choose from and they are variations of the same theme. Whoppers vs Big Macs, not a huge difference.
And some people have no choice at all.
Do I believe there is a cartel and price fixing in the telecom industry? Absolutely. And they’re not like dairies that should be guaranteed a price to prop up the milk industry. It’s not like their cows are going to keel over.
As long as there is zero regulation and no incentives to be competitive, they’ll do what they please. And the only real option will be to go without.
You know this. You don’t seem stupid. But you are acting remarkably incurious and deliberate clueless.
The internet has been around for over 20 years. Net neutrality was a recent thing. I started with a dial-up modem and now I have cable. I didn’t notice any big change in the internet when NN was put in place. What problem did NN fix?
Who/what was the moving force behind NN?
I am not incurious, but if someone wants to sell me something then he has to convince me that I need it. I am not convinced.
So sell me NN. I will listen. But I want hard data, not speculation about what could happen.
I play Indian classical music on my 1 hr drive back from work. Verizon thinks it is not important and allocates lowest bandwidth for my streaming at bare minimum. So instead of seamless streaming without glitches I will have the spinning wheel for most of my drive as I try to play my Indian music YouTube video. But I pay Verizon the same fee you do and you are watching your white supremacist YouTube video without a hitch because Verizon thinks your streaming service is important.
Net neutrality is an issue because of all the innovations using Internet in the last decade. Regulating it is in anticipation of fairness because of the nature and scale of its growth and the corporations abusing their reach.
* in anticipation of problems with fairness
Off topic: 😈 😆
Also OT: From a commenter on Wonkette (no, not me):
Oops, I forgot to change the r-word.
Also, what this commenter (not me) said:
The wingnuts are so many Kruges to me, now.