• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    William on Two things about Trump
    Kathleen A Wynne on Two things about Trump
    Catscatscats on Two things about Trump
    William on Two things about Trump
    William on Two things about Trump
    Catscatscats on Two things about Trump
    Kathleen A Wynne on Two things about Trump
    Catscatscats on Two things about Trump
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on I’d hate to be this DOJ lawyer…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Two things about Trump
    William on Two things about Trump
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Two things about Trump
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Two things about Trump
    William on Two things about Trump
    Kathleen A Wynne on Two things about Trump

  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women

  • Archives

  • History

    March 2015
    S M T W T F S
    « Feb   Apr »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Matching Donations Up To $1,000 Total
      A donor has generously offered to match all donations, up to a total of $1,000 or till Friday midnight (the end of the fundraiser.) When we’ve reached the total, if we do before the end, I’ll put up a post, subject to vagaries of being awake and at a computer. My sincere thanks to this […]

  • Top Posts

    • Advertisements

Go there, Digby.

Posted on March 9, 2015 by riverdaughter

You are very close. All you need is the F word to put it all together and add a dash of second amendment.

That ought to keep you up at night.

Advertisements

Filed under: General | Tagged: , , , , , , |

« »

4 Responses

  1. Sohvl, on March 10, 2015 at 1:52 pm said:

    Pioneering sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920) found that cults based on charismatic leadership often follow the routinization of charisma. Sociologist Roy Wallis (1945–1990) argued that a cult is characterized by “epistemological individualism” meaning that “the cult has no clear locus of final authority beyond the individual member.” Cults, according to Wallis, are generally described as “oriented towards the problems of individuals, loosely structured, tolerant [and are] non-exclusive”, making “few demands on members”, without possessing a “clear distinction between members and non-members”, having “a rapid turnover of membership”, and as being transient collectives with vague boundaries and fluctuating belief systems. Wallis asserts that cults emerge from the “cultic milieu”.

    In an article on Al Qaida published in The Times, journalist Mary Ann Sieghart wrote that al-Qaida resembles a “classic cult”, commenting: “Al-Qaida fits all the official definitions of a cult. It indoctrinates its members; it forms a closed, totalitarian society; it has a self-appointed, messianic and charismatic leader; and it believes that the ends justify the means.”

    Are Wallace and Sieghart even talking about the same thing?

    • riverdaughter, on March 10, 2015 at 10:20 pm said:

      I asked myself the same thing. But never mind weber. Al Qaeda, branch davidians, the anabaptists of Munster, they are more alike than different.

      • Sohvl, on March 11, 2015 at 4:41 pm said:

        But the definitions they give are 180 degrees apart on every major point of interest.

        Is “cult” like “proscribe” or “raise” vs “raze” or something?

        • riverdaughter, on March 12, 2015 at 8:46 am said:

          I found the descriptions wanting as well. I prefer the term High Control Group.
          What I found encouraging is that I’m no longer just bat shit crazy. If Digby is starting to get an uneasy feeling about it, there’s a slight possibility that Democrats will start to take it seriously.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: