You are very close. All you need is the F word to put it all together and add a dash of second amendment.
That ought to keep you up at night.
Filed under: General | Tagged: 2nd amendment, Al Qaeda, cult, Digby, extremism, Fox News, fundamentalism |
-
Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:
Recent Comments
riverdaughter on Last “Debate”: Anything could… riverdaughter on Last “Debate”: Anything could… riverdaughter on Last “Debate”: Anything could… riverdaughter on Eric Trump ruined my bakery.… MAG on Eric Trump ruined my bakery.… Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on If you don’t think Covid is a… riverdaughter on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… jmac on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… riverdaughter on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… alibe50 on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… riverdaughter on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… William on Simple WFH Office Etiquet… William on No slacking now, Pennsylv… Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Leslie Stahl didn’t wear a mas… Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Leslie Stahl didn’t wear a mas… -
Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal- The Blog Moves OnBut the show goes on.
- The Blog Moves On
-
The Confluence
- Suburban Guerrilla
- Happy birthday, LauraShe would have been 73 today:
- Happy birthday, Laura
- Ian Welsh
- Presidential Debate ThreadIf you want to talk about it, please do so in comments to this post.
- Presidential Debate Thread
4 Responses
-
-
- Corrente (Lambert)
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Avedon’s Sideshow
- And the forests will echo with laughter October 20, 2020"Bolivia election: Evo Morales's leftwing party celebrates stunning comeback: Exit polls for presidential election project win for Luis Arce as rival concedes defeat. Evo Morales's leftwing party is celebrating a stunning political comeback after its candidate appeared to trounce rivals in Bolivia's presidential election. The official res […]Avedon
- And the forests will echo with laughter October 20, 2020
Are Wallace and Sieghart even talking about the same thing?
I asked myself the same thing. But never mind weber. Al Qaeda, branch davidians, the anabaptists of Munster, they are more alike than different.
But the definitions they give are 180 degrees apart on every major point of interest.
Is “cult” like “proscribe” or “raise” vs “raze” or something?
I found the descriptions wanting as well. I prefer the term High Control Group.
What I found encouraging is that I’m no longer just bat shit crazy. If Digby is starting to get an uneasy feeling about it, there’s a slight possibility that Democrats will start to take it seriously.