 | Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | William on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | lililam on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| lililam on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| William on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | Catscatscats on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | Sweet Sue on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | Propertius on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| Propertius on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| Propertius on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
| Propertius on Here’s the approved GOP talkin… |
| Catscatscats on To impeach or not to impeach,… |
 | bellecat on Here’s the approved GOP talkin… |
Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal
The Confluence
Suburban Guerrilla Ian WelshYou are very close. All you need is the F word to put it all together and add a dash of second amendment.
That ought to keep you up at night.
Filed under: General | Tagged: 2nd amendment, Al Qaeda, cult, Digby, extremism, Fox News, fundamentalism |
Corrente (Lambert) Avedon’s Sideshow
Are Wallace and Sieghart even talking about the same thing?
I asked myself the same thing. But never mind weber. Al Qaeda, branch davidians, the anabaptists of Munster, they are more alike than different.
But the definitions they give are 180 degrees apart on every major point of interest.
Is “cult” like “proscribe” or “raise” vs “raze” or something?
I found the descriptions wanting as well. I prefer the term High Control Group.
What I found encouraging is that I’m no longer just bat shit crazy. If Digby is starting to get an uneasy feeling about it, there’s a slight possibility that Democrats will start to take it seriously.