The New York Times has an article today about the unavoidable conflict between Clinton and Obama. They’re both on Martha’s Vineyard this week. For all I know, it’s manufactured by the flying monkeys in the media who seem to be salivating for a Krystle vs Alexis fight in The Pond. But there are some encouraging utterances from the Clinton camp:
Mr. Obama is fast becoming the past, not the future, for donors, activists and Democratic strategists. Party leaders are increasingly turning toward Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as Democrats face difficult races this fall in states where the president is especially unpopular, and her aides are making plain that she has no intention of running for “Obama’s third term.”
Thank goodness for that. I don’t think I can take another four years of careless conservatism spouting from the mouths of clueless young Ivy League males. We have been waiting for six long years to hear what Clinton really thinks about Obama. Yeah, it was great that she was able to swallow her pride and anger and play nice for the sake of “unity” but enough’s enough. Even if she doesn’t run, I am looking forward to her informed critique.
I especially like the bit where Clinton says “ ‘Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle,”
Amen to that.
I am desperate to hear someone talk about their organizing principles. No, I am not kidding. That “put everything on the table and we’ll negotiate” crap has been an utter disaster. And like Katiebird, I’d like the conversation to move away from foreign policy to economics.
On the other hand, this is probably not the best way to raise a lot of money from political donors who want to retain their iron grip on all the money in the universe. Let’s hope Clinton can convince some of them that it’s in their best interests.
The Party, on the other hand, seems to think this is still 2008 before the crash:
Christine Pelosi, a longtime Democratic activist and daughter of the House minority leader, Nancy Pelosi, said her phone and email “just exploded” after Mrs. Clinton’s remarks.
“Now is not the time to second guess the commander in chief, particularly when you’re a former member of his cabinet and national security team,” Ms. Pelosi said.
Oooo, really? And when would the best time be, Christine? I mean, he’s already opened up the tax payer safe to the finance industry, took a backseat to the foreclosure crisis and long term unemployment, presided over the dismantling of our research and development sector, and locked us into a two tier class system when it comes to health insurance. When is any Democrat allowed to criticize him? No one ever gave Bill Clinton that kind of deference.
Anyway, here’s to a little high tension. It’s about fricking time.
Additional thoughts: We were the target of a troll attack yesterday. It was wildly fun, by the way. Katiebird and I are just warming up. Bring it on. But we did wonder what the heck triggered it. It reminded both of us of the days in 2008 when the Obot trolls fired barrage after barrage from different IP addresses. In fact, we both thought it was a good idea that we hadn’t gotten rid of those addresses in the banned list for the spam filter. Now, we can go through the IPs at our leisure and figure out if there’s a common thread.
But it does make us wonder, why bother? Obama isn’t running for another term, we don’t have nearly the readership that we had in 2008 when we peaked at something like 56000 hits/per day. And the left has not sought to deign us with the pleasure of their revenue stream by adding us to their blog rolls. In fact, I’d say we were true blue all the way through the last six years but hardly worth the effort and attention.
And yet, in spite of our anonymity compared to 2008, we still seem relevant enough to send a bunch of psych-out shock troops. We can’t dismiss the possibility of a Republican attack but yesterday’s seemed so familiar. It left that whiff of O-zone behind it.