• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    seagrl on Why is something so easy so di…
    Propertius on Is “Balance of Nature…
    jmac on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Propertius on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    lililam on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    lililam on Is “Balance of Nature…
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    February 2013
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • Cheaters
      Profits on Medicare Advantage plans are at least double what insurers earn from other kinds of policies. Gee, I wonder why? There is tons of evidence that insurers in the program have been manipulating a program that pays them extra fees for enrolling customers with more illnesses. The change took away payments for some of … Continue reading Cheaters
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The First Great Environmental Crisis Will Be
      Water. As I’ve said for many years. The world is facing an imminent water crisis, with demand expected to outstrip the supply of fresh water by 40 percent by the end of this decade, experts have said on the eve of a crucial UN water summit. I’ll use the US as an example, though this going to effect almost all countries, some much worse than others, and it wi […]
  • Top Posts

SOTU {{facepalm}}

There are two problems with the SOTU speech.  I don’t believe Obama and the Republicans have a gift for manipulation.  We need to learn how to monkeywrench that.

First, let’s start with Obama.  I don’t care what he said last night or what his delivery was like or even if some of his ideas were kinda, sorta in the vague general direction we need to go.  Even if he didn’t have a history of making you think he has your best interests at heart just before he delivers some incredibly weak policy, all his goodwill would have been negated when I heard this:

Our economy is stronger when we harness the talents and ingenuity of striving, hopeful immigrants. And right now, leaders from the business, labor, law enforcement, and faith communities all agree that the time has come to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Real reform means strong border security, and we can build on the progress my Administration has already made – putting more boots on the southern border than at any time in our history, and reducing illegal crossings to their lowest levels in 40 years.

Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship – a path that includes passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English, and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally.

[yeah, yeah, all well and good but what’s this…?]

And real reform means fixing the legal immigration system to cut waiting periods, reduce bureaucracy, and attract the highly-skilled entrepreneurs and engineers that will help create jobs and grow our economy.

There are two problems with the idea that American needs more highly skilled entrepreneurs and engineers from foreign countries.  The first is that it’s bullshit and the second is that Obama is getting his information from the same Wall Street braintrusts who ran our research complex into the ground.

Let’s take on the bullshit aspect first, shall we?  Since 2008, the biotech/pharma research sector has laid off over 100,000 scientists, the bulk of them in NJ.  Don’t believe me?  Check out FiercePharma Top 10 Layoffs for 2009 for a taste of the carnage.  As for foreign engineers needing to come here, I can only assume he means the kind of engineers they employ in the Apple plants in China.  Because I know American chemical engineers who are working in Canada and Japan because they can’t get a job in the United States.  So, the only reason I can think as to why we are bringing in foreign engineers is that the companies that want to hire them have been keeping perfectly good, highly skilled American engineers out of the labor market and now, realizing they actually need engineers, they want to bring in cheap labor from elsewhere.

It is the mark of a very disinterested, captured president if he is unwilling to address the real problem of unemployed American STEM workers, who apparently have no voice, in order to shut up the yammering from the executive suites of big companies.  He’d rather send our own American high tech workers out of the country and away from their families than ask companies to demonstrate why they need to be sitting on the pile of cash that should be wages.  This is shameful.

Secondly, about that entrepreneurship?  What exactly does he think R&D professionals are made of?  When we were working for corporations, we were not exactly making the big bucks.  Some of us came from the midwest and were dragged out to the most expensive areas of the country when our corporate overlords decided to merge their little hearts away.  THEN when those same corporate overlords realized that the cost of research was suddenly too high, because they vastly increased the cost of each scientist by moving them out to the suburbs of New York City and Philadelphia, they unceremoniously laid our asses off and stranded us here.  The severance packages are temporary, mortgages are forever.

So, where exactly are we supposed to get money to be entrepreneurs?  I mean, who in their right mind would lend money to little biotech startups with a lead compound and expect that compound to go all the way through clinical to market?  Well, as we have seen from recent evidence, it is very, very difficult to start those kinds of businesses here because once the compound is at the development stage, you need to lay off early discovery personnel in order to have enough capital to see the drug through the next stage.  What foreign grad student would voluntarily come to America to put themselves through that  short employment cycle?  Why not go to Germany to study?  I would.  I wouldn’t waste my time struggling here in the US where you are expected to live on a pittance, public transportation is awful, healthcare is ridiculously expensive and you can’t buy a decent house on the $37K a year that you’ll be expected to make as a permanent post doc.

If Obama can’t get this one policy right with regard to the causes and effects of high unemployment among American STEM workers, I can’t believe he has a good grip on ANY economic issue.  It’s either willful ignorance on his part or he just doesn’t give a damn.

Look, guys, and by guys I mean the White House and Congress, high tech workers have to eat too.  You may think we’re all a bunch of unwashed geeks who eat Cheetos out of the vending machines and are awkward around the opposite sex but if you actually do any kind of investigation into the lives we live, you will see that we’re not that different from other “normal” Americans.  We like nice places to live that aren’t collapsing on us, decent transportation, a nice bottle of wine with dinner, trips to DisneyWorld with the kids we procreated and all the other stuff that makes life in the US worth living.  Whoever is telling you that STEM people are willing to work for post doc salaries until they get the brilliant idea that’s going to turn them into the next Thomas Edison is really not dealing well with reality.

Speaking of not dealing with reality well, Paul Krugman has a post on his blog about Marco Rubio’s response and how Rubio casually threw in this bit of, well, there’s no other way to say this, lying:

This idea – that our problems were caused by a government that was too small – it’s just not true. In fact, a major cause of our recent downturn was a housing crisis created by reckless government policies.

Krugman says:

OK, leave on one side the caricature of Obama, with the usual mirror-image fallacy (we want smaller government, therefore liberals just want bigger government, never mind what it does); there we go with the “Barney Frank did it” story. Deregulation, the explosive growth of virtually unregulated shadow banking, lax lending standards by loan originators who sold their loans off as soon as they were made, had nothing to do with it — it was all the Community Reinvestment Act, Fannie, and Freddie.

Look, this is one of the most thoroughly researched topics out there, and every piece of the government-did-it thesis has been refuted; see Mike Konczal for a summary. No, the CRA wasn’t responsible for the epidemic of bad lending; no, Fannie and Freddie didn’t cause the housing bubble; no, the “high-risk” loans of the GSEs weren’t remotely as risky as subprime.

This really isn’t about the GSEs, it’s about the BSEs — the Blame Someone Else crowd. Faced with overwhelming, catastrophic evidence that their faith in unregulated financial markets was wrong, they have responded by rewriting history to defend their prejudices.

This strikes me as a bigger deal than whether Rubio slurped his water; he and his party are now committed to the belief that their pre-crisis doctrine was perfect, that there are no lessons from the worst financial crisis in three generations except that we should have even less regulation. And given another shot at power, they’ll test that thesis by giving the bankers a chance to do it all over again.

Since I am about to move into a neighborhood that was affected by the housing crisis (disclaimer: my new house is a foreclosed property in a neighborhood of them), I will be doing my own little bit of research on Rubio’s side of the story to determine what exactly went wrong but let me just say that I’m skeptical.  Not only am I skeptical about the cause of the disaster but I suspect that the true bad actors are still acting badly.  Check out this post by Dave Dayan at The New Republic to see how investment bankers are messing with the housing recovery.  I had a conversation with a realtor yesterday, a listing agent for foreclosed properties, who told me that the banks are a mess.  From his description, I get the image of banks out of control, restructuring constantly, trying to game the system on a minute by minute basis, unsure who gets what contract papers when and in what order and losing money for themselves and their investors in the process because the working environment is constantly shifting.  Of course, that is a much more complex and longer story to tell and besides, it doesn’t fit with the “these are not the droids you’re looking for” strategy  of deflecting blame from the big money donors of the Republican party so the general public is largely unaware of the bankers’ shenanigans and how they are setting communities, homeowners and renters up for even more destructive wealth extraction.

But what really floors me is how so many voters who lean conservative actually believe this crap.  Is it because the alternative explanations never get floated past them or that those alternatives are too complex?  Or is it because the conditioning is too ingrained?  Demographic trends will take care of much of negative effects to a critical mass of Americans but for the good of the country, we really need to figure out how to put a stop to allowing so much of our population to believe lies.  At the very least, there should be a truth in advertising statement for both the SOTU address and its responses.  But even that will be insufficient if there’s no way to effectively push back in such a way that an evidence based world is the operant one.

It’s a huge problem for both the left and the right.  If we don’t solve it, we might as well just let the plutocrats indenture us now.

Update: So, apparently the new meme is “Down with Austerity! Up with a balanced approach of spending cuts and tax increases!”  A “balanced approach of spending cuts and tax increases” is still AUSTERITY.  I’m sorry, no matter how you slice it, when you cut spending in the midst of a depression, which is what we are in right now, the consequence is going to be AUSTERITY and a return to more recession.  Can we cut the crap already, Barry?  You need to spend money, the money you can get for ridiculously low interest rates, and put people back to work.  Anything else is AUSTERITY.

I blame the “progressives” who got us into this mess.  I will never, never forgive the assholes who got schmoozed by this Republican president in disguise.

25 Responses

  1. To stop the lies bring back the Fairness Rule. Regulate the media.

    Hell, the media, the banks – keep big ass chain link choke collars on those mad dogs – always.

  2. Pardon the double post.

    You know, if regulation is sooooo bad, then here’s my challenge – start with sports. If deregulation is such a magic bullet, then it should work just fine for sports – take those umpires and referees right out.

    If the maggots won’t deregulate sports then they don’t get to do it to the economy.

    • Good point. Or why not brain surgery? I’ve always wanted to be a brain surgeon. Why should I have to pass some stupid board exam and undergo a residency and all that crap? Why can’t I just buy some books and practice on some pet hamsters before I take your tumor out?

  3. As a retired immigration attorney let me also remind you that the following “proposal” IS EXACTLY WHAT THE CURRENT LAW REQUIRES. What bullshit!

    “Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship – a path that includes passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English, and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally.”

    • You know, I can’t get over the feeling that Obama’s advisors and speechwriters think the American people are incredibly stupid and that they can just string us along like Cindy Lou Whos who are no older than two.
      I think that pisses me off the most, to be thought an imbecile that they can fool on a periodic basis. It just goes to show that the so-called progressives that put him in the White House are not as smart as their own Ivy League degrees would have them believe.

  4. All good points, RD, but he’s not really on about STEM workers, is he? “Doesn’t care” is all there is on that one.

    It’s all about the Hispanic vote. The Repubs have changed their tune, so now B0 changes his. (Just the tune. I’ll be amazed if it extends to any real improvements. See Marcha’s comment that he’s only talking about current law, for one piece of evidence.)

    The thing that blows me away is how few votes it takes to get attention. Hispanics switched away from Repubs in some tiny proportion of the overall electorate. 5%? Maybe a bit more? Meanwhile women — you know, that demographic which is everywhere — rush to reassure Dems to take them for granted. And they do. If instead people followed RD’s lead (and yours truly’s, for that matter), it could be women’s rights and real health care and income inequality getting all this attention. As John Lennon said, “Imagine….”

    • There seems to be a lot of focus on the illegal/legal routes to immigration but that’s not the stuff that got MY attention. I think inviting STEM guest workers and grad students here on extremely restricted work visas is a very, very bad idea. If you’re going to let them in, why not invite the econ majors too? Why not make the visas unrestricted so the banking industry can get their share?
      But more than that, there’s this idea that there is a shortage of STEM workers when really this is just another ploy by the financiers to get what they think they want.
      They have no idea what they’re doing and there’s nobody calling them on it. It’s all in the moment and now, now, now. If we all suffer because there’s nothing but specialty orphan drugs and poorly paid scientists who live lives of poverty and drudgery, well at least the financiers got their way and were not inconvenienced.
      Isn’t that what the Obama administration is all about? Not inconveniencing the financiers?

      • Yup. The STEM worker policies are nonsense from start to finish. The only people who benefit are the fat cats who need workers to chew up and spit out. That couldn’t possibly be the desired result, right? Not of “Pair o’ Shoes” Obama, right?

  5. Contract approved. The house is mine! Bwahahahahahhahhhhhh!
    Now, onto the inspections and cost of repairs…

    • Congratulations. We await progress reports on repair, upgrading, redoing, etc. Hopefully you can stand all the bright ideas you will get from people who wish they had a house and will project their dreams as good advice. And some of it may even BE good advice in theory.

  6. Congratulations, RD, I’m wishing you many happy years in your new house.

  7. Are you moving from NJ?

    BTW, did you see Lambert’s post about Kos and holding out olive branches to PUMAS – of which you were the first (when it stood for Party Unity My Ass)?

    • Yep, I’m blowing this pop stand.
      I saw the Kos thing. Several things occur to me at once but the primary thot is that Kos has trashed the site’s credibility since late 2007. The second is that the small evil group that took over the party must think we’re really stupid if they think we’re going to fall for their shtick. I have no doubt that they’re going to try to use a woman next time to get what they want. It might be “her turn” but if she gets the support of Kos et al, she will be their creature and I will definitely keep my distance.
      Unlike the party loyalists who naively stuck with Kos to re-elect the lightbringer, I am not slow on the uptake. And I’m not cheap.

  8. I just can’t listen to Obama. Not that I’ve ever heard a SOTU that I did like.

  9. If we had sector wide labor agreements and required H1-B [& the rest of the alphabet soup of immigration] to be paid a premium 1.35* times the sector wide agreement and they could take another job at any time** there’d be few complaints at letting in as many as could find jobs…uhm

    * hey if they’re better than US citizens, shouldn’t we require that they be paid in accordance with their “true” value?

    ** so long as the competing firm had to pay the same or better.

    Now i don’t think my proposal would actually happen, it’s just rhetorical response to the arguments of xenophobia, racism, cultural intolerance, greed et al provided by those who make money in the destruction of America’s scientific class.

    • Hey Rd, good post as usual. First time, long time I skipped the SOTU. I’ve had enough of Mr. Slick. Some discussion a day or two ago on Brad DeLong’s site about STEM workers. GET EM OUT BEFORE THEY CAN RETIRE ON OUR DIME! Check it out.

  10. Commenter Hugh has left a good comment on a recent NaCap thread about the plans Obama has against our survival benefits and how he discusses them in his SOTU. But also how he disguises them in plain sight with clever weasel words, lawerly language, etc. Cutpaste just below.

    Hugh says:
    February 13, 2013 at 2:46 pm
    You can find the text of Obama’s SOTU here:


    What is interesting is that you can use your browser’s find function to look up the frequency of individual words and phrases. “Inequality” is not mentioned at all. “Rich” is not mentioned either. “Wealth” is not mentioned once. “Wealthiest” gets 4 hits: one is just generic “wealthiest nation” so doesn’t count. The three others are:

    1. “Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion — mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans.”

    2. “But we can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and the most powerful.”

    3. “We’ll reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors”

    Consider these. In the first instance, spending cuts affect mainly ordinary Americans. But Obama doesn’t reference who’s taking the hit here but he does for the rich where the minority of the cuts are coming from. And, unsurprising I know, he isn’t even honest about those. They stem from allowing the “temporary” but extended Bush tax cuts to expire, and not on all the rich but just those making more than $400,000 a year, you know those who are most able to hide and shelter their income.

    In the second, note the weasel word “entire”.
    “We can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction.” No, just mostly, although it was the wealthiest Americans who blew up the economy and were the only ones government bailed out and made whole afterwards. Again Obama makes it sound like he is conceding something when the reality is the reverse. The rich got the bailouts. The rest of us got most of the cuts in government spending.

    And even the little bit more Obama wants from the rich isn’t even a token. It’s a poisoned chalice, as the third quote shows. “Wealthiest seniors” refers to means testing Medicare. What’s so bad about that? It’s a wedge. Obama wants to start this Medicare premium raising with the wealthiest but then he wants to extend it well down into what remains of the retired middle class.

    There is nothing in Obama’s SOTU about attacking the massive wealth inequality that is killing the country and the middle class. Nothing.

    The speech also includes the word “jobs” 34 times. A quick glance at the occurrences suggests 3 main categories of usage.

    1. Boasting about his job creation. About as cynical as you can get considering the massive, and massively understated, size of the jobs crisis in the country (both in numbers and quality).

    2. Contradictorily, blaming Republicans for obstructing his stellar jobs creation efforts.

    3. Trickledown tax cuts and incentives (which have never worked, not under Reagan, not under Bush, not under Obama) to spur new job growth. Again not surprising. Obama is the Austerity President. He is actively suppressing demand and cutting spending.

    His “job” policies won’t work, but then just like his efforts on the foreclosure front, they aren’t meant to. They are just crumbs thrown to the rubes to distract them and keep them confused. His proposals will disappear into Congressional committees. What little substance that is in them, if any, will be hacked pieces and then filibustered. Obama and the Democrats will blame Republicans much as he and they are already doing, and nothing will change, or rather things will continue to get worse for most of us.

    • David Petraitis says:

    Read more at http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/02/yes-virginia-the-rich-continue-to-get-richer-the-1-got-121-of-income-gains-since-2009.html#qc0ow0VPHEK1UsrD.99

  11. Best of luck in the new house

    There are two problems with the idea that American needs more highly skilled entrepreneurs and engineers from foreign countries. The first is that it’s bullshit and the second is that Obama is getting his information from the same Wall Street braintrusts who ran our research complex into the ground

    yup…. Everything the suits touch turns to shit

  12. They have finally shelved the Trickle Down economics.
    Now they don’t let loose a drop

  13. While the Reptilians will hang on for quite some time for a number of reasons–especially the dark art of gerrymandering–the Dinocrats are becoming the majority party.

    Alas, the Dinos have done that only by selling out and becoming everything they once loathed, minus only the r@ci$m. In the Smaug Elite’s New Old South Amurka, the masters, overseers, and slaves can all be found in all human skin tones now. 👿

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: