• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    William on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    Propertius on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    Propertius on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    William on Selective Attention
    Branjor on Selective Attention
    Branjor on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    jmac on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    William on Joe Manchin’s Outrageous …
    jmac on Selective Attention
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Opposites
    jmac on Opposites
    Propertius on Opposites
    William on Opposites
    William on Opposites
    jmac on Opposites
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    May 2012
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Remember Colin Powell
      Colin Powell was the first black secretary of state. He was the consummate insider, who climbed the military bureaucracy with great skill and vigor. A man who always knew what had to be done to get ahead and get along. In Vietnam, for example, he understood his role perfectly: his time as a young U.S. Army Major posted in Saigon, when, after the My Lai Massa […]
  • Top Posts

DNC to Arkansas Voters: “F%^& you”

Following West Virginia’s primary vote example, Arkansas voters are fixin’ to deliver a message to the Democratic party today.  Tennessee lawyer, John Wolfe, was running a mere 7 points behind Barack Obama in recent polls of the Democratic presidential primary there.

Oh, I know that a lot of people are going to call the voters of Arkansas racists or, even worse, conservatives.  But in 2008, Arkansas voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton and, well, we saw how that turned out at the convention.  So, maybe, they’re not racists or conservatives.  Maybe they’re just pissed that their primary votes last time meant absolutely nothing to the DNC and they are trying to communicate their extreme displeasure with the suck ass job that Barack “I would give myself a B+” Obama has done in the intervening four years.

The DNC has told Arkansas straight out that it doesn’t matter who it votes for in the Democratic primary, Barack Obama is getting all of the delegates.  Yep. They say he hasn’t complied with the delegate assignment rules.  I’m not sure the voters really give a flying f^&* what the delegate rules are. They just want to register their discontent and be counted.  As I recall, it was the DNC’s robotic adherence to The RULZ!, while feverishly working to undermine them, that lead to Obama’s nomination in the first place, voters for the other candidate be damned. But that’s the official decision.  Which leads me to wonder why states all over the country spend millions of taxpayer dollars to stage a primary where the results have already been determined by the party.  That’s money that could be used to hire some teachers or pave some roads or repair bridges or pay for some poor kid’s asthma medication.

It’s also just hints at what Katiebird has been saying about how the party could make a change in the lineup if it wanted to.  If primary results are meaningless and the party has decided who will get the delegates, then that means that if they get enough of these messages from primary voters who are disgusted with Obama, they could have a serious discussion with their candidate and maybe even bring in a relief pitcher.

Nothing is certain, not even Obama’s name on the ticket, until the balloons drop at the convention.  That’s not being a fantasist or crazy.  That’s seeing an opportunity to put pressure on the party that most other activists seem to have missed.  You don’t have to settle.

But one thing is for damn sure, if the party ignores its voters during primary season this year, they may not have a chance to make amends before the general election in November.  And there’s no amount of bad mouthing Romney you can do to make them ignore their anger at the party and Obama.  If I were the party, I’d get out front of the problem early and find out exactly what it is that voters want.  Because Arkansas is not an isolated example.  Kentucky is also having a primary today and while Wolfe isn’t on the ballot there, voting “uncommitted” is an option.  Then there’s Texas next week where Wolfe is on the ballot, and New Jersey in June where write in candidates are allowed.  Guess who I’m writing in? So, there are plenty of opportunities left for voters to slow the party down from rolling right over them.

“If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?”


I read this post yesterday at Digby’s about how the Democrats have made themselves a party of special interests and now the rest of the country is rejecting it.  While I understand the hypothesis, I disagree with it.  It just gives progressives an excuse to whine that no one understands them and all the good stuff they are trying to do.

The problem with this argument is that in 2008, the party had a humongous opportunity to break out of the perception that it is beholden to special interests but it passed on it.  By electing Clinton, they would have gotten back all of the working class people (by the way, that would include everyone not working on Wall Street).  The biggest pull they had was that millions of women from both sides of the aisle would have voted for her.  And this is why what happened to the party in 2008 was a self-inflicted wound that has festered: women are NOT a special interest.  Women are 53% of the population.  By electing Hillary, they would have acknowledged that fact.  By electing Obama, they aerosolized their base into a bunch of competing factions and then proceeded to gleefully neutralize the power of those factions.  The party has now become exactly what Digby fears it is.  It is perceived as being the refuge of the culturally disenfranchised groups who have no power and are completely at the mercy of the party fundraisers.  Those fundraisers have all the real power to direct policy, and they have- for their own benefit.  Without the money, Obama and the party is left to pander for the support of the groups it has gone out of its way to weaken in the past four years.  And the rest of the country, under stress economically is just tired of the austerity, unemployment and their dismal future prospects.  Republicans have seized on this situation by pouncing on those disenfranchised groups making it necessary for Obama to go after them, albeit weakly, and that makes him look even more beholden to them while paradoxically not being able to offer them much more than lip service.  It’s a fricking disaster.

The struggle is not between the liberal Democrats and the rest of the country.  The struggle is between the liberal Democrats and the moneyed interests that have taken control of the party.  The rest of the country *loves* liberal policies like Medicare and Social Security.  They’d love a modern New Deal initiative too, if only the party had a candidate who would put one together.  That’s never going to happen as long as one weak president is beholden to the guys who funded his campaign the first time.  With Obama, we get the worst of all worlds.  He’s a moderate Republican disguised as a liberal Democrat.  Karl Rove couldn’t have designed it better.

It could have all been avoided if the DNC had actually allowed a real roll call and floor fight at the convention in 2008 instead creating the false illusion that one candidate was soooooo far ahead of the other that there wasn’t a contest.  Too late to redo 2008 but 2012 is still available, and as we have seen above, primary votes are fungible to the Democrats…

As for whether African Americans would have abandoned the Democrats, I have my doubts.  *Maybe* the party might have lost the male portion but African American females would have won with either candidate. I think they would have come around. Then there were all of the Republican women I met when I was canvassing and phone banking who couldn’t cross lines in a closed primary but were determined to vote Democrat in the general.  That would have been more than historic.  That would have been a complete cultural shift and we missed it.

Oh well.

And Gallup says that Hillary Clinton is incredibly popular.

21 Responses

  1. Why must everyone in America use white subway tiles when I need them??? None to be had in the color I want.

  2. they’re easy to install, can be mixed well with color or black border and are ‘timeless.’ The punks in Chicago will spin the Ark & Ky results just like they did in ’08. Folks who don’t follow politics will conclude they must know something.

    • They might be easy to install but I can’t find them mounted on mesh in the color I need (biscuit). I had to abandon the original tile I wanted and went with 3×6 individual tiles in white that I will have to install with spacers. Not ideal.

      They might try to spin but I think they’re cruisin’ for a bruisin’ if they are this out of touch and determined to keep control at all costs. In fact, this version of the Democratic party is scarier than the Republicans. At least with the Republicans, you can see where their hands are. They’re not trying to hide their evil. With the Democrats, it’s hidden but much more deadly to democracy.

  3. With all the updates it’s hard to find the information in the quote About the Delegates. Here’s the quote:

    “From the Link in her post …. “here’s the money quote: “On Monday, the Arkansas Democratic Party announced that it would not award any delegates Wolfe, even if he wins a strong portion of the popular vote.

    According to the Associated Press, Democratic Party spokeswoman Candace Martin said Wolfe had not complied with Arkansas’ delegate selection rules and had not turned in two mandatory documents needed in the application process. Martin also added that the Democratic national party has told the Arkansas state party that any delegates Wolfe might claim won’t be recognized at the national convention.

    In a PolicyMic story comment, Wolfe argued against this point: “I filled out 4 sets of forms. I wrote out a check for $2500 to be paid to the Arkansas Democratic Party. They cashed it. Nothing was said that day about deadlines missed or forms missing. It gets better, stay tuned for more.”

    So Wow.

    • That DNC comment/behavior should really improve the attitudes of the voters disenfranchised in 2008.

      • I looked a little more and found something close… President Johnson won the New Hampshire primary but by a close margin and then dropped out of the race two weeks later. There was other stuff that contributed. Found it here: The Tet offensive and the media

        But that wasn’t a loss… to uncommitted.

  4. Let the DNC run over the wishes of voters, the republicans will have a heyday with it come November.

  5. Arkansas results: UPDATE: 11:32 PM With 71% reporting, Obama has been declared the winner. But here’s what’s striking: Obama 58.7% of the vote, to Wolfe’s 51%.

    (UPDATE) That MUST be a typo! Must be 58.7% to 41% … right?

    Kentucky results: Perhaps the most surprising result of the evening came in regards to the Democratic primary race on which President Barack Obama was the only candidate. However, Democratic voters also had the option of choosing an “uncommitted” box. This option received an alarming 42% of the Democratic vote, with the president receiving 58%. The figure of registered Democrats who remained “uncommitted” unquestionably serves as a statement on behalf of many of Kentucky’s Democrats who have not been happy with many of the president’s policy initiatives.

    (shrugging) It didn’t seem to matter in 2008 so I don’t expect it to matter in 2012. The DNC is determined to implode.

    • The Kentucky results are arguably more relevant because Kentucky has a closed primary.

      Arkansas, er, perhaps not so much.

    • 58.7% to 51% is correct. The Arkanshire is a strange and mystical land, where the normal laws of math and science are more like suggestions. :mrgreen:

      Now I must go off to bed, and hope that damned flying pony mail carrier doesn’t drop an anvil through my ceiling. 😛

  6. I didn’t even know this Wolfe character was running, but I voted for him.

    I wasn’t the only one in the Arkanshire who voted for Wolfe. 😈


    F%^& YOU, Dinocratic Bosses. 😈

  7. I wonder if voter memory explains this poll
    Of course, my memory is long enough to dismiss BOTH parties by now.

    • Holy HEMIOLA, there sure are a lot of r@cysts in Florida.
      A lot of r@cysts who lost their jobs.
      And houses.
      And got the DNC runaround in 2008.

      Good thing there’s so much time between now and the election for obama to teach those Republicans a thing or two.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: