• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Propertius on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    William on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    Beata on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    William on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    jmac on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    Beata on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    jmac on Republicans Cannot be Allowed…
    Propertius on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    jmac on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    riverdaughter on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    eurobrat on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    Propertius on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    Lucyk on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
    Beata on Ukraine and Obama: it ain’t…
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    March 2012
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Open Thread
      Use to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts.
  • Top Posts

Tuesday: It should be obvious but… #standwithsandra

(Note before we start: This is not a pro-Republican blog.  Friends don’t let friends vote Republican.  And we are most definitely not Reagan Democrats or conservative Democrats or birthers.  We are liberal, FDR style, Democrats in Exile who want our party to start acting like DEMOCRATS.)

It should be obvious to women that what is good for the Democratic party is not necessarily good for them.  But I think that what we are experiencing currently is a bit of the shock doctrine applied to gender politics.

The political strategy of the Democrats seems to be to let anti-woman legislature proceed without much pushback until it reaches a critical stage before they jump up and down in protest.  The outrage on our behalf seems concocted.  No, it’s more than concocted.  It’s entirely false.  Know how I know?  We still have only 17% representation in Congress.  You’d think that if women’s interests were all that important to the Democrats that they would do something about that.  Here in NJ, we have 13 (or is it 12 now?) representatives to Congress and not one of them is a woman.  Not one.  Well, you might say, maybe that’s just a recent phenomenon.  No, it is not.  We haven’t had a single woman representing us in Congress in all of the time I’ve lived here in the past 20 years.

In 2006, Linda Stender, a state congressperson, ran for my district, NJ-07, and came within 4000 votes of winning.  4000 votes in a district this dense is trivial.  It’s *tiny* here.  In 2006, the party seemed to be behind her.  When she ran again in 2008, it looked to me like the party abandoned her.  She was a pro-choice liberal Democrat.  Rahm Emannuel’s Democrats were more student body president types.  Unexciting, compliant, obedient schmoozers who tried to hide the fact that the were Democrats and carefully scrubbed all traces of reproductive rights issues from their campaign webpages.  You can almost hear the consultants telling them, “Don’t let them think you’re a liberal Democrat and for god’s sakes, get rid of the pro-choice stuff.  The secret to winning this year is to grab the not-quite-as-crazy evangelical vote.  Don’t worry about the Democrats.  They got no place to go.”

This year, the New Jersey Democratic party isn’t backing even ONE woman challenger for any Congressional districts.  There is one woman named Diane Sare who is running as a LaRouche Democrat, whatever the f^&* that is.  That’s it.  All of the rest of the candidates are men.  Are we to believe that in the entire state of NJ with over 8.8 million people, we couldn’t find at least one Democratic woman per district to challenge Republican male representatives?  Unbelievable.

Some of the districts do not yet have Democratic challengers so it could be that the party just hasn’t put the names up there yet but still, this is just a really sad state of affairs.  You might want to check your own state to see who your state Democratic party is promoting.

The representation in Congress is pathetic.  We rank 71st among nations behind Pakistan, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates.  Can you believe that?  In places where you can’t walk down the street without getting harassed for not wearing your hijab and where religious courts still hold women in subjection, they have more women in elected office than here.

We have to hold the parties accountable for this sad state of affairs.  We’re not going to make any progress with the Republican party this election season but now would be a very good time to make the so-called sympathetic men in the Democratic party put their actions where their mouths are.  I call on women today to demand two things from the Democratic party immediately:

1.) That their local and state Democratic parties nominate a woman challenger for every seat currently held by a Republican for the 2012 elections.

2.) That they impose a quota on themselves, and write it into their party platform, to have no fewer than 34% women in their Congressional and party delegations, committee chairmanships and nominations for elected office, and that elected men who are not pulling their weight for Democratic party values be asked to step aside for a female challenger.

It’s the least they can do.  To do anything less makes them look like they are using the current attack on women’s rights as a political game to attract women to the Democratic party without actually having to do anything to promote women’s causes.  We are more than 50% of the population and we deserve better than this.  If they can’t committ to those two things this year, without question, with all of the fire on gender issues raging around them, then they are not our allies and we need to discuss how we create a party that is more responsive to our needs as quickly as possible.

And what is happening to women’s rights will be repeated with the social insurance programs.  The Republicans will be allowed to introduce legislation unchallenged by Democrats and then Democrats will howl that they’re trying to impoverish old people.  It’s a game where the things we value most are held over a pit of snapping crocodiles by the very same people who promise to save us from the crocodiles only if we give them everything they want.  It’s extortion and it’s evil.

Don’t give Democrats a pass.  Now is the time to strike a hard bargain.   I can hardly believe what I’m seeing these days when women are pulled off of the steps of the Virginia Capitol and carted away for trying to defend their rights.  You’d think this was 1918.  But it just proves that women’s suffrage means nothing if all you can vote for are men.

23 Responses

  1. Bears repeating…

    “women’s suffrage means nothing if all you can vote for are men.”


  2. Other than your vote, what leverage do you have?

    Withholding a campaign contribution won’t bother most of the Democrat pols because they get their money and marching orders from Wall Street/Corporate America.

    They aren’t going to take any of us seriously until they lose their seat in congress because we didn’t vote or voted third party. Either action means a republican by the way.

    • I’m going third party. You gotta start somewhere and we have hit a dead end with the Democrats. I can’t believe I bought their crap for so many decades. They are completely useless to women.

      • Which third party, RD?

        • Pick one you can live. I’d be thrilled if there was a genuine third party candidate before November. Who knows, maybe one is in the works.
          Are you familiar with the paper this article is referencing?

          • No I haven’t. Thank you for pointing it out. Dawkins has a strong research interest in the evolution of auto-immune diseases. His hypothesis is that they’re an unfortunate by-product of the body’s constant fight to destroy pre-cancerous cells before they become malignant. The immune system is trying to distinguish between those cells and slightly-different normal cells. If the immune system goes too far, it starts to destroy normal cells as well as pre-cancerous cells, and the body now has an auto-immune disorder.

            My interest in auto-immune disorders like lupus is both professional and, sadly, very personal.

          • Requested a reprint from the corresponding author. 🙂

          • Just received it. That was…quite fast, actually.

    • That’s a price we may have to be willing to pay as part of the pain of building a longer term movement for longer term victory.

  3. http://www.superchooseday.com Hillary Clinton is the only name that ANY and ALL polls show that she would win in the 2012 Presidential election. She is a moderate who has proven in every job she has taken that she knows how to get things done. She knows the meaning of words like: hard work, public service, strong middle class means strong USA economic health, leadership. You put Hillary Clinton and Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins on as a Presidential ticket and you will have your first non-party President! You will forever break the strangle hold of the elitist partist posing as a two party system. Never again just Democrats or Republican sameness! http://www.americanselect.org

    • That is a fantasy.
      Hillary is not in the same party as Snowe and Collins. Their ideological differences are VAST.
      I’ve heard suggestions like this before. Don’t waste your time on them. It will never, never happen and it *shouldn’t* happen.
      While party labels mean relatively little these days, there is a big difference between liberals and conservatives and we would all be better off if we could clearly identify those differences.

  4. 3d party is the way to go this time. 🙂

  5. Riverdaughter
    Please consider running for President. Or at least to represent your district in Congress. You are educated, have a strong work ethic and I am sure you are a fast learner. You can converse eloquently on most important subjects and you understand America’s, as well as women’s needs.

  6. Off topic … but still:

    “Between 1901 and 2011, the Nobel Prizes and the Prize in Economic Sciences were awarded 549 times to 853 people and organizations. With some receiving the Nobel Prize more than once, this makes a total of 826 individuals and 20 organizations.”

    Of these, only 43 were women. A mere 5%.

  7. I could not care less which party sponsors any given politician. More gender balance would be great, yes, but mostly I just wish the thugs and felons now in office faced a credible opposition, instead of the clown show currently on offer.

    • This is not about party except that to even entertain the notion that Hillary Clinton and Olympia snowe could be on the same ticket is naive, shows a lack of understanding of politics and is just foolish.
      Just sayin’.

      • Text is slipping all over the screen, and it’s not clear whether this is responding to my comment. Just sayin’ … I didn’t suggest that Snowe and Clinton run together, and wouldn’t have done.


  8. A friend just reminded me of Shirley Chisholm.

    She was incredible (if you’re too young to remember her…check this out!) And OMG, she was a qualified person of color, too.


    • Yes, she was. She was an amazing feminist politician. As was Bella Abzug and Barbara Jordan. (I was young but precocious ;-)) But she was a female politician first, IMHO. I’m very confused by the tendency of modern feminists to ask for a combo pack. She’s got to be a female + African American or a female + lesbian or female + chinese/marathon olympian/astronaut. They’re all women. It would have been a lot simpler if we had just stuck to the one thing we all have in common. The message got waaaaaay too diluted and instead of benefitting by a critical mass of what we all share, we got distracted by trying to fight all of the battles at once. That did not work in women’s favor so let’s stop doing it.

  9. I really enjoyed reading this. Unfortunately, I wish it wasn’t true. In one of my middle school art classes today I was trying to explain that history is His story and that we still live in a patriarchal society. This was all in reference to a work of art by Judy Chicago that is a tribute to women. The sixth grade boys all seemed to sit a little taller like they were so special. We have to change this mindset…starting with these little boys!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: