• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Sweet Sue on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Giving Season
    pm317 on Pandering to the unscientific…
    pm317 on Pandering to the unscientific…
    pm317 on Pandering to the unscientific…
    pm317 on Pandering to the unscientific…
    pm317 on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on The New South is Rising
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
    jmacwa on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Pandering to the unscientific…
  • Categories


  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    June 2011
    S M T W T F S
    « May   Jul »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The Torture Culture
      Ok, here’s the deal: Torture does not work to get information. Period. You do not torture people to get information, you torture people to send information, or rather, to send a message. What is that message? (Originally from Dec 16, 2010, but it seems worth re-upping for a new generation of readers – Ian.) We Torture People […]
  • Top Posts

The Affordable Care Act and Employer Provided Health Bennies

Paul Krugman and Greg Sargent are following a report from McKinsey that says up to 30% of employers are planning to drop health insurance for their employees as a result of the Affordable Care Act.  As you can imagine, Democrats are quite concerned with the validity of this study and whether the predictions are true.  While the jury is still out on whether the study is true or just a carefully planted right wing talking point, let’s look at some unsettling trends that many of us in the R&D industry are starting to see.

A lot of us are getting laid off and can only find jobs as contractors.  Contractors do not usually receive benefits like health insurance from their employers.  If they work for a CRO, they can sometimes buy health insurance coverage but this is typically more expensive than employer provided health care.  Bennies come out of the pockets of the employee contractor, not the corporation that is hiring them.  That saves big companies a lot of money in the end even if they have to pay a fee to the contracting company, which also comes off of the employee’s salary.  It sounds like a sweet deal for everyone but the employee.  Companies get out of those tiresome obligations and the middle man gets a cut of the employee’s salary.  Awesome.

Now, suppose there is a healthcare bill that comes along that mandates universal coverage.  Actually, universal coverage is something you want in a successful national health program but that assumes that costs are controlled elsewhere, otherwise it’s hugely expensive for the insured.  Ok, so universal coverage is mandated.  The burden of covering healthcare is now shifted to the employee.  An employer mandate might be necessary to make sure the group rates are affordable but if an employer can shed their employees and hire them back as contractors, doesn’t that circumvent the employer mandate?  So, should we be surprised that we are seeing a shift from regular full time employment with bennies to contracting work without bennies?  The companies are not incentivized to retain full time workers but to shed them and to do it as quickly as possible.  It’s nothing personal.  It’s just the way the laws are written.  If there’s nothing to stop you from taking advantage of the system, why wouldn’t you?  In a way, the new law gives them a free pass that they might not have considered before.  The new law makes it legal and profitable to ditch your bennies.  And if your primary obligation is to increase shareholder value, what would *you* do?

It’s not a bug.  It’s a feature.

So, if it turns out that the McKinsey study results are real, color me unsurprised.

Disclaimer: I am not a Republican and generally despise right wing talking points.  But you don’t have to be a right wing lunatic to have a problem with Obamacare.

More on the employer mandate: This Time article discusses the employer mandate of the Affordable Care Act and cites San Francisco as an example where the employer mandate has been adopted successfully.  The difference between San Francisco’s plan and what we got with the Affordable Care Act is a public option.

But according to the new report co-authored by Dube, 61% of San Francisco restaurants are very or somewhat supportive of the mandate. This may be because restaurants in the city have found a way to pay for their increased benefit costs without absorbing the expense: many have added a 3% to 4% health care surcharge to customers’ bills. In addition, at the same time that the mandate was passed, a de facto public option was implemented. Employers that opt not to provide coverage must pay $1.23 to $1.85 per hour per worker to help fund the public plan. This public option, which only covers care from some doctors and facilities in the city of San Francisco, has proven popular with employers, with 21% using it for workers. Already the San Francisco public option has enrolled a majority of the city’s previously uninsured residents, more than 50,000 people. And according to a survey conducted by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, 94% of those participating in the program are satisfied with the results.

Um, we didn’t get a public option in the Affordable Care Act.  So, the high price of insurance will be borne by the person forced to buy insurance on the open free market.  Technically, I don’t think that’s the employer’s problem anymore as long as it can get by with contracted employees. I think it’s possible to legislate social responsibility but our Congress didn’t do it in the Affordable Care Act. So, expect a lot more layoffs and a lot fewer bennies.

Yet another reason to get rid of incumbents in 2012.

Advertisements

8 Responses

  1. The more I think about this, the more pissed off I get. Didn’t anyone in the administration or Congress think this through?? Republicans played the Brer Rabbit role very well.
    How come Democrats aren’t that shrewd? Oh, that’s right, the last Democrat who knew how to play this game was reviled for being a “triangulator”. I’m beginning to think Democrats deserve extinction as a party. They completely lack a sense of self-preservation.

    • Not only did they not think it through, but if I remember all of the Dem leadership was pretty d@mned smug about eliminating the Public Option from any kind of debate. A huge finger in the face of the disenfranchised base but their Obot base that they misled as well.

      Before you can do the right thing, you have to be able to sell it. To sell it, you have to believe in it. For me the Public Option along with real Healthcare Insurance Reform was a huge turning point for the soul of the Democratic Party. Somewhere along the way the leadership lost it.

  2. More US employers to drop coverage under Obama health care overhaul

    http://tinyurl.com/3r5l62u

    …..As for the workers who find themselves without insurance, under the bill they are required to obtain coverage or face fines that could eventually rise to as much as 2 percent of income for all those except the most impoverished. If individuals and families do not qualify for Medicare, Medicaid or other governments programs, they will be forced to purchase coverage from private insurers who offer cut-rate plans and can raise premium costs with no meaningful government oversight…..

    • As I said before, the study has not been verified. McKinsey is withholding the data. So, I would be careful about citing it before the facts are in. But you don’t have to be a socialist or a Republican to put together some plausible scenarios.

  3. It may not be true but now that it has been said it has credibility. Refuting it, challenging it, disproving it will never dislodge the fact that it has attained credibility. This is how the game is played.

    Now throw the shit at them. Drop all employees from health benefits. Everybody.

    Silence.

    Can you hear the roar now. From both right and left.

    It is all beyond the point of fixing. That has to be understood. Our strategy now has to be a Fatal Strategy. We have no choice.

  4. F}#%! Flat tire. This one looks nasty. AAA on its way.

  5. It is all beyond the point of fixing. That has to be understood

    Indeed…there’s neither the will or even the know how….besides the lack of dough

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: