• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    pm317 on Slurs
    pm317 on Slurs
    pm317 on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Propertius on Slurs
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on Slurs
    Propertius on Slurs
    Propertius on Slurs
    Seagrl on Slurs
  • Categories


  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    May 2011
    S M T W T F S
    « Apr   Jun »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The Younger You Are the More Your Vote Should Count
      In most countries the young vote less than the old (though if someone champions them, as Corbyn did, their voting rates soar). But the young are the very people with the most stake in how society is run. If you’ve got 60 years ahead of you, well, it matters that society is well run for […]
  • Top Posts

Tuesday: OY! Canada

Last night, the Conservative government of Stephen Harper in Canada won a majority of seats.  We send our condolences to our more reasonable neighbors to the north who will have to suffer until October 2015 to get rid of them.  Don’t screw it up like we did.

It wasn’t all bad though.  Jack Layton’s New Democrat Party (NDP) picked up a whopping number of seats while Michael Ignatieff brought the Liberals to an ignominious defeat.  I am unfamiliar with the geographical representation of the two parties, with the exception of the Bloc Quebequois, so I will leave the pithier explanations to Ian Welsh.  But I would note that Fox News didn’t get a stronghold in Canada until 2003-2004.  Harper was elected in 2006.  Coincidence?  Dunno, it looks like a good study for a poli sci major.

What’s more interesting is the composition of the left in Canada after this election. The Liberals, who are analogous to the American Democrats here, were decimated.  Their conciliatory leader of the Liberals, Michael Ignatieff, lost his own seat.  That’s like Harry Reid losing his Senate seat.  The political landscape is now split between the Conservatives and the much leftier NDP party.  The centrist Liberals have all but vanished.  pfwishhh!  Gone like the wind.

If I were to guess, I would say that Canadians wanted an opposition and the Liberals were not providing one.  So, they brought in a new regime.  It could also be the case that the conservative win wasn’t so much an ideological shift but the result of Liberal voters staying home.  And we have no idea what the Bloc Quebequois was really up to but it seems to play the role of the Oppositional/Defiant party who will deliberately misbehave until it gets attention.

We also can not rule out the Osama bin Laden effect.  Our media markets cross over and yesterday was all about Osama.  We know from studies of such things that the more voters are reminded of their own mortality, the more they gravitate towards conservative politicians.  We worship the people who promise to protect us from the unknowable evil of the outside world.

So, was the death of Osama bin Laden a triumph of American intelligence and ability or was it an opportunistic propaganda opportunity for Obama or was it part of the messaging directed at Canadians going to the polls?  Or a little of all of these things?  I’d like to know about the timing because that seems very conveeeenient, doesn’t it?  We couldn’t have waited one extra day to take bin Laden out?  It’s not like he knew what was coming.

But one thing seems clear: Canadians are sick to death of wishy washy democrats who call themselves Liberals who pretend to defend them and then capitulate over and over again to the Tories.  That does not bode well for Obama and the American Democrats.  A similar thing could very well happen here.  If American Democrats are given no choice next year but to vote for another term of Obama, a lot of them will desert the Democratic party and defect to more lefty parties.  I will be one of them.  I predict that the Democrats will lose seats and Republicans will pick some up, not because they are particularly well loved but because they are filling a vacuum left by all those disgusted voters.  It only seems like Obama and the Democrats are the only game in town right now and that may be true at this moment.  But I wouldn’t want to stake my political strategy on the idea that the rest of us true liberals are going to vote for the Democrats just because the alternative would be sooooo much worse.

That’s not MY fault.  That’s the fault of the party that doesn’t offer me anything I want.  I’d rather give my vote to a different entity and help that party become a legitimate force to be reckoned with.  It might take a couple election cycles but to give in to the guilt trips and the peer pressure only gives the bad guys and the weak collaborators a free pass to do what they please and I refuse to cooperate in the destruction of my political system.  I want to put my efforts into building up a new alternative. It appears that this is what the Canadians have chosen to do as well.  Good luck to them.  I hope they survive the next 4 years of conservative lunacy.  And the first thing they should do when the NDP finally does score a majority government is boot Fox News to the curb.  ASAP.

The writing is on the wall for 2012.  It doesn’t have to be a Republican victory but with Obama and the current crop of Democrats in place, it’s hard to see how any other outcome is possible.  The Centrist schtick is getting old.

Look, North, Oh, American Democrats.  This is your future in 18 months if you don’t get your act together and make some really hard choices.  Better do it now while you have time to recover.  Next year will be too late.

Update:  Count this as day two of my “Osama is dead? Meh.” reaction.  His death, to me, is anticlimactic.  I also don’t think Obama should be accepting all of the praise and taking a victory lap over it.  It sounds like our intelligence machinery and well trained specialists were responsible for this final chapter in Osama’s life.  If he’s dead, well, alright then.  I’m a liberal but I still eat meat, medium rare.  You will not get hand wringing and  “Oh, what is to become of us now that we have tasted blood?  We are truly barbaric.”  F$%@ that S^&*.  I refuse to take part in the collective guit the left is feeling over the death of Osama.  Oh, Please.  There is a time for turning the other cheek and there is a time to knock the teeth out of the person who just tried to kill you.  I can do the whole Keith Carradine Kung Fu thing when the opponent can more easily be taken down by using their own force against them.  But lefties shouldn’t fool themselves into thinking that if we all just “use our words” all the time, we can live in peace and harmony and rainbow ponies.  The practice of power requires that you meet aggression with aggression.  Just make sure your side is bigger and better so that the duration of the conflict is swift and complete. That’s where the Bushies went wrong (or did they just have a different agenda).  I particularly liked Hillary’s comments about how Al Qaeda cannot win. They can only postpone the inevitable.

Let’s not confuse and conflate the erosion of our civil liberties with taking out dangerous attackers.  They don’t have to go together.  Osama, the authoritarian egotist in Pakistan is not a poster child for the authoritarian egotists in Washington, DC.  Osama bin Laden was an unrepentant, bad, malicious man but he was just an excuse for what our own bad guys wanted to implement. Osama was responsible for his own fate when he decided to murder 3000 innocent people and then ran and hid like a coward.  You don’t need to suspend habeas corpus to deliver the coup de grace.  Neither is the blow necessarily an unjust result of that crack down on civil liberties.  The two things should be seen as separate tethered loosely by one pivotal event.  Cheney and Bush were looking for a reason.  Osama handed it to them.  But it was us, the American people, who let the Bushies get away with it.

I would have preferred to have Osama captured and tried in the US and then deep sixed in some Supermax prison, never to be seen or heard from again, his name and face erased from the history books ala ancient cultures obliterating unpopular political figures.  There was very little chance that Osama bin Laden would ever achieve a state of sophrosyne while he waited and regretted his life sentence in a western jail.  But that wouldn’t have been the point.  The point would have been to reduce the man from his status as a leader of a fanatical fundamentalist organization to that of   a mere mortal, subject to the higher powers of a just state.

No paradise, no 72 virgins, no glory.  Just oblivion in the hands of his enemies.

Al Qaeda would have hated that.

But let’s not rejoice or get carried away.  The blood lust that sang in my ears 10 years ago has subsided to an annoying tinitis.  I’m glad he can’t do anymore mischief but his legacy survives.  It would be foolish to think we are safe and even more foolish to ever think we were before he attacked us.  We are no less vulnerable to attack than we were before 9/11.  We just have to learn to live with that, like learning to live with the knowledge of our own deaths.  Death will come.  We can take steps to avoid having it catch up to us too soon but it will happen eventually.  It’s silly to think we can make friends with it or escape it if we choose to be above all that stinky grave stuff, it’s so barbaric and uncouth.

We are never safe, we are not immortal, we cannot appease the zealous.  All we can do is the right thing, as frequently as possible, and hope that the ties we make are stronger than the ones we break.

Let’s let Osama sink to the bottom of a watery deep and let the waves swallow him  and his memory up.  Good riddance.

Advertisements

9 Responses

  1. Harper’s majority came with something short of 40% of the vote. That’s what happens often when you have a multi-party system. He is only 2% up (or less) from the last election. One thing Harper is committed to is eliminating public funding for elections and going with the American system of whoever raises the most money wins the prize. That, to me, will be the most disastrous legacy of this election.

    • Ya’ know, I’m not sure that more money necessarily translates into winning anymore. Oh, sure, you can buy all of the ads you can eat but no one has to watch them anymore. And there is growing evidence that more and more voters are savvy to what’s really going on based on the appearances of angry voters at townhall meetings where Republicans are trying to defend their cuts to medicare. Voters aren’t buying it. Some guy from Brooklyn got blasted recently when his voters turned up at his townhall meeting clutching copies of the congressional budget office report. Information is freely available on the web and people are starting to get alternative opinions. That doesn’t mean that money still can’t manipulate the voting process but it does mean that it will be harder to stampede people into one predetermined outcome.
      I am just concerned about social media right now. The former Kossack survivors of 2008 saw how it could be manipulated but new politicos might not be attuned to it yet.
      education is key

      • The upside to the Canadian result is that it demonstrates conclusively that over 60% of the population are NOT neo-cons. (And, by the way, the NDP’s signs and logo have been orange longer than I have been in Canada, and I came here in 1972 as Nixon was declaiming “I am not a crook”; so, no worries that it is just b’kos!
        The Conservatives got this majority by limiting their attention to only the ridings they assessed as achievable, and the strategy worked for them. However, Harper is still deeply disliked and distrusted by the vast majority of Canadians, including much of the media. It is going to be a very interesting next 4+ years.

  2. “let the waves swallow him and his memory up. ” Not gonna happen; not in our lifetime. He was too useful to a lot of people on both sides of the divide.

    I’m not shedding any tears for Osama, like you, I found his death anti climatic. I also don’t begrudge anyone a sense of satisfaction, but I did, however, find the celebrations, unseemly. I was also surprised by the way the media ran with that theme.

    Death is still death, no matter whom the deceased. In states where they still have the death penalty, do the citizens throw parties after the penalty is carried out? No, because they understand that taking life is unfortunate even when justice/retribution/payback requires it.

    • Think of it as more of a “Ding, Dong, the Witch is Dead” thing. It’s not unseemly so much as sooooo 2001.
      I think the execution of Tim McVeigh was more satisfying but I wasn’t one of his victims’ family members. YMMV.
      I’m not going to grab for the smelling salts just because people are celebrating Osama’s death. I only question why they are bothering after all of these years. And it’s not like Obama has done anything special here. I would expect ANY US president to have seized the opportunity to get him dead or alive. In fact, that was a given so it’s not like he has done anything extraordinary. It’s not like he woke up on May 1 and said, “No president has captured bin Laden since 9/11. By God! This is an outrage. The people are calling out for justice. I shall take it upon myself to right this wrong, since no one else will. Page, where is my trusty sword? and bring some pine logs hither!”
      I figure it was something that all American politicians would sign onto without even asking. Ok, it’s been done. He’s not a hero. It’s just part of presidentin’. Now, what about a jobs program?

  3. live by the sword die by the sword.
    good he is gone.but it don’t fill the gas tank 🙂

  4. Yeah, Since it doesn’t change anything (peace is not at hand) I don’t see much reason for cheers. And I feel about his death pretty much like I feel about any serial killer. Good riddance.

    • Ditto.
      I don’t understand why our side of the spectrum is having problems with this. We’re not talking about Bradley Manning here. It’s Osama bin Laden. Jeez, no wonder the left is so good at losing elections.

      • Now if Obama had announced the immediate closure of all war zone bases and the homecoming of the troops, I’d have flown out to DC myself.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: