• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    Propertius on Happy Tolkien Reading Day
    thewizardofroz on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Branjor on Is “Balance of Nature…
    riverdaughter on Happy Tolkien Reading Day
    Propertius on Happy Tolkien Reading Day
    Propertius on Throwback Thursday: Corey the…
    Propertius on Throwback Thursday: Corey the…
    jmac on Throwback Thursday: Corey the…
    William on Throwback Thursday: Corey the…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    thewizardofroz on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    William on Is “Balance of Nature…
    Beata on Is “Balance of Nature…
    seagrl on Why is something so easy so di…
  • Categories

  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    December 2010
    S M T W T F S
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Open Thread
      Use to discuss topics unrelated to recent posts.
  • Top Posts

Who are we killing and why?

While Left Blogistan is getting their collective panties in a wad over the thought of poor Julian Assange facing rape charges in a Swedish court of law, our government is busy killing people:

‘Unprecedented’ Drone Assault: 58 Strikes in 102 Days

It may take years, but some researcher will travel to Pakistan’s tribal areas and produce a definitive study on what it’s been like to live amidst an aerial bombardment from American pilotless aircraft. When that account inevitably comes out, it’s likely to find that 2010 — and especially the final quarter of 2010 — marked a turning point in how civilians coped with a drone war that turned relentless.

Even as the Obama administration’s assessment of its war strategy nodded to the primacy of the CIA’s drone campaign, Predators underscored the point. Over the past two days, four Predators or Reapers fired their missiles at suspected militants in North Waziristan, with three of the strikes coming early today.

They represent a geographic expansion of the drone war. Today’s strikes come in Khyber, an area abutting Afghanistan’s Nangahar province, that’s been notably drone-free. It has become an area for militants fleeing military action in South Waziristan to take succor.

They also bring the drone-strike tally for this year up to 113, more than twice last year’s 53 strikes. But those figures don’t begin to tell the whole story.

According to a tally kept by the Long War Journal, 58 of those strikes have come since September: There has been a drone attack every 1.8 days since Labor Day. LWJ’s Bill Roggio says the pace of attacks between September and November (there was a brief December respite, now erased) is “unprecedented since the U.S. began the air campaign in Pakistan in 2004.” (By contrast, in 2008, there were just 34 strikes.)

Both Roggio and the New America Foundation have found that the overwhelming majority of this year’s strikes have clustered in North Waziristan: at least 99, by Roggio’s count.

That torrid pace of attacks should make it beyond debate that the drones are the long pole in the U.S.’s counterterrorism tent, even if the drone program is technically a secret. The Pakistanis haven’t sent their Army into North Waziristan to harass al-Qaeda’s haven in the mountainous, Connecticut-sized region, waving off U.S. pressure to invade.

Without a ground force to rely on, the CIA argues, the only option for fulfilling the administration’s goal of crushing al-Qaeda is a missile strapped to a surveillance aircraft. During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would pursue al-Qaeda in Pakistan unilaterally if he deemed the Pakistanis intransigent. No one expected he meant he’d do so from the skies.

Of course, the Pakistanis have been the silent partner in the strikes, allowing the drones to fly from their territory, so it’s not as if these are unilateral attacks.

But no one knows whether a backlash is just around the corner. While most Pakistanis remain ignorant of the strikes, those in the tribal areas live literally in their shadow, and register enormous discontent, approving of retaliatory attacks on U.S. forces.

Reportedly, the CIA’s top officer in Islamabad has fled Pakistan after a man from North Waziristan whose son and brother were killed in a strike filed a lawsuit against the agency.

There’s no official or universally accepted figure of how many civilians have died as a result of the strikes, but New America pegs it at around 25 percent of all fatalities. Long War Journal’s registry is more generous, claiming that 1,671 militants and 108 civilians have died in the strikes since 2006.

Then there’s the question of whether the strikes are legal. Obama administration claims that the September 2001 congressional Authorization to Use Military Force in retaliation for 9/11 provides all the legal protection necessary for the strikes. Some lawyers and law professors, by contrast, think that the drones’ remote pilots could eventually get hauled before a war-crimes tribunal.

Who exactly are we killing? What have they done to deserve death? Who decided they should die?

Last time I checked we weren’t at war with Pakistan.

20 Responses

  1. This is why I laugh when the Left says Hill is the war monger and Biden is the peacenik, because he doesn’t want more war with Afghanistan. Nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, he just wants unmanned drones to wage an inhuman war with Af-Pak.

  2. Remember that study on Iraqi war related deaths?

    Nobody believed (cared) the number was that high and ridiculed it.

    The same goes for this news, we Americans care more about the price of a gallon of gas or who will be the next idol.

    I’m beginning to think that Obama, his crony Democrats and the entire republican party are agents of some Divine Retribution for the atrocities we’ve allowed.


  3. C’mon, let’s be reasonable, here. You don’t want us testing those things domestically, do you?

  4. I don’t know how good the intelligence is that directs these drones but I much prefer to use properly directed drones than human beings.

    If the intelligence is iffy, the drones should nor be used.

  5. Hell, we’ve been watching the drones for some time. You would think Obama might say something
    like real soon.

  6. Obama has been signaling since the primaries that he wanted all out war in Pakistan. And we have it. But we’re pretending we don’t.

    • This is the ‘it’s going to get worse before it gets better’ stage. Whether the left blogistan and progs accept it or not, we have extend the governance of Bush four more years, destroyed the opposition party and elevated the 42nd pres to acceptable status.


      Hillary 2012

  7. Off topic: How does one change the name one uses on this blog? 😕

    On every other political blog I post on, I am “Monster from the Id”. I think I’d like to be da Monster here, too. 😈

    • I’d say clear your internet cache and type in a new name

      • I entered middle age before I started going on the Net regularly.

        What is an internet cache and how does one clear it? 😕

        • If you don’t know what it is, you may not want to do it. You might need to put in all your passwords again. Try logging out of WordPress instead.

          • Thanx, but I’m not logged into WP to begin with. I never wanted to keep a blog, so I didn’t register.

    • If you’re not registered with WordPress then you should be able to just overwrite the username that pops up when you’re writing a comment.

      Send me an email at katiebird@gmail.com if that doesn’t work and we can figure it out.

  8. It is worth pointing out that Wikileaks has helped reveal the slaughter of innocents conducted by the US military and the secret services in various parts of the world, including Pakistan. If decent people are concerned about the lynch mob pursuing Assange, this is part of the reason why.

  9. This is yet another sign of Obama’s unwillingness to do anything that may involve work or sacrifice. If he could blanket Afghanistan and Pakistan with drones, he would avoid American military deaths in lieu of massive casualties of civilians. But that’s fine with him, presidents don’t lose elections for killing non-Americans.

  10. Some lawyers and law professors, by contrast, think that the drones’ remote pilots could eventually get hauled before a war-crimes tribunal.

    Would these lawyers and law professors be ok with normal bom-bs or mis-siles. What is the difference between Petraeus and the remote pilot. Who are these brilliant law professors. If they want to protest the war, protest the war.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: