Alegre posted this very recently: Ed Rendell is throwing his support behind Hillary and will vote for her for nomination. Politickerpa has more details. Rendell says:
Gov. Ed Rendell, in an interview with PolitickerPA.com today, lauded the resolution reached last week that will allow Clinton’s name to be placed in nomination, before U.S. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) ultimately accepts the party’s presidential nomination.
… I think it’s good not because it will display any disunity, but because it honors the hard work of so many people who supported Sen. Clinton,” said Rendell, who was one of Clinton’s most visible and vociferous campaigners during the run-up to the state’s April primary. “Many of the Pennsylvania delegates worked their heart out for Sen. Clinton, and they’re excited to cast a vote for her. From my vantage point, that will be closure for them.“I think it will have the cathartic effect that both Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama are hoping to have,” he added.
Hmmm, cathartic or emetic? I guess it depends on which camp you’re in. If you’re in the Greek tragedy camp, you’re looking for the tragic hero to undergo some self-reflection of his hubris and come to a state of sophrosyne. The catharsis is the effect of purging dramatic tension in the audience. I’ll go for that.
But if you’re an Obamaphile right now, you’re probably feeling queasy.
It could be a sign that the ice is cracking or maybe Rendell is just an outlier. Still, Charlie Rangell was thrown under the bus last week as was Wes Clark. So, who knows? We will have to wait for a second data point to see if there is a trend. A third would point to a correlation.
Of course, the flood gates would open if negative news came to light about Obama. Steady, Obamabots, we’ll get the barf bucket.
Filed under: Presidential Election 2008 | Tagged: Ed Rendell, superdelegate, vomitorium | 325 Comments »