• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    MsMass on He knew he was a looooose…
    riverdaughter on He knew he was a looooose…
    jmac on He knew he was a looooose…
    Propertius on He knew he was a looooose…
    Propertius on He knew he was a looooose…
    William on Thanksgiving Week Wordles
    William on He knew he was a looooose…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on He knew he was a looooose…
    riverdaughter on He knew he was a looooose…
    riverdaughter on He knew he was a looooose…
    Propertius on He knew he was a looooose…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on He knew he was a looooose…
    Ivory Bill Woodpecke… on He knew he was a looooose…
    Beata on Thanksgiving Week Wordles
    William on Thanksgiving Week Wordles
  • Categories


  • Tags

    abortion Add new tag Afghanistan Al Franken Anglachel Atrios bankers Barack Obama Bernie Sanders big pharma Bill Clinton cocktails Conflucians Say Dailykos Democratic Party Democrats Digby DNC Donald Trump Donna Brazile Economy Elizabeth Warren feminism Florida Fox News General Glenn Beck Glenn Greenwald Goldman Sachs health care Health Care Reform Hillary Clinton Howard Dean John Edwards John McCain Jon Corzine Karl Rove Matt Taibbi Media medicare Michelle Obama Michigan misogyny Mitt Romney Morning Edition Morning News Links Nancy Pelosi New Jersey news NO WE WON'T Obama Obamacare OccupyWallStreet occupy wall street Open thread Paul Krugman Politics Presidential Election 2008 PUMA racism Republicans research Sarah Palin sexism Single Payer snark Social Security Supreme Court Terry Gross Texas Tim Geithner unemployment Wall Street WikiLeaks women
  • Archives

  • History

    January 2008
    S M T W T F S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • Looking good
      Just…WOW! GA voters, facilitated through the hard work of county election & poll workers, have shattered the old Early Vote turnout, with 300,438 Georgians casting their votes today. They blew up the old record of 233k votes in a day. Way to go voters & election workers. #gapol pic.twitter.com/rYbmpjAs43 — Gabriel Sterling (@GabrielSterling) November […]
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • The Decline & Fall Of The Soviet Union
      Our society seems fascinated by the fall of empires and nations. You rarely see a book on the “birth” of Rome, say, it’s the collapse we care about. In this I’m a bit odd, I prefer the creation period, the early years when everything goes right, to the fall, but it’s important to see that death precedes birth. The Czars fall, the Soviets rise… The Soviets fa […]
  • Top Posts

Proposed Experiment for Tonight’s Debate

listening-ks6232.jpgFor those of you with DVR’s, I am going to propose a little experiment.  If you’re like me, you’re an analytical type.  What people say ususally can’t be spun past you. You pay attention to the content, syntax, synonyms, connotations, phrasing and logic to make sense of what each person says.  What did John Edwards mean when he said he didn’t accept money from “federal” lobbyists?  Why does Obama ramble so much, using prepositional phrase after subclause, an never getting to the point?  Why can’t Hillary put a little more lilt into her punch lines?   That’s all well and good and it’s very important.

But what about the rest of it?  Who approaches who for the handshake, whose eyes dart to the left while speaking, who can’t stand still?  Those of you who have children can probably tell when they’re fibbing or nervous or having fun.  It’s all over their faces.  Adults are much better at hiding that but it never completely goes away.  Oliver Sacks, author of “The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat” tells the story of patients with aphasia watching Ronald Reagan give a speech and laughing their asses off.  They couldn’t process the language but they knew from his expressions that he was being disingenuous.

So, here’s my idea, turn off the volume.  Watch the debate without any auditory input.   Then ask yourself, which person impressed you just by watching what they did and not what they said.  Then, back the DVR up and listen to what they said.  Do you have a different impression?  Now, ask yourself, if you were not the analytical type, would you be more persuaded by what you see or what you hear?  What if you are just an average Joe with an average vocabulary?  Would visual input be more or less important?

One Response

  1. Here’s what I am going to do with tonight’s debate: not watch it. I’ll watch the Celtics-Mavericks game, and read the transcript of the debate tomorrow. This is largely for basketball reasons (I assume Matthew Yglesias is making that same choice!), but also because the debates when watched live are too much like watching stock-car racing: you are always on the edge of your seat for fear of a crash, which you don’t really fear if it’s not the one you’re rooting for.

    The way to recover the substance of the debates is to experience them in a more detached way, so that’s what I have chosen. And I won’t kid you–there’s a third reason. Much as I support Hillary and much as I think Obama is a brilliant man, they both make me cringe in these formats. Obama seems cloying and Clinton seems mechanical. I’ll stick to words on the page, if it’s OK with you!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: