Last night, Jon Stewart took apart Jim Demint’s worldview piece by piece. It’s a thing of beauty. Unfortunately, you have to listen to Jim Demint’s irritatingly folksy South Carolina drawl speaking nonsense right wing talking points during the segment. By the way, why is it that Stephen Colbert, a South Carolina native, does not speak in the same drawl? I lived in SC as a kid, in Charleston, and EVERYONE down there had a southern accent. So, what gives, Stephen? And is it possible that Fox type viewers respond to the drawl in a hypnotic sense? My natural speech pattern is more like Stewart’s. It’s rapid, a bit throaty, punctuated. Demint’s is slower, more musical, even a bit soothing and against it, Stewart sounds harsh, like a splash of uncomfortably cold water on the upper arms. When you listen to these two go at it, you can’t help but pick a side. I’m on Stewart’s side but I imagine that Demint’s southern siren call is hard to resist.
I love Craig Crawford. He’s one of the more honest pundits on TV (that I don’t watch anymore). Check out his blog Craig Crawford’s Trail Mix for interesting observations on the campaign.
However, I did find his recent post on the effect Ron Paul will have on the Republican primary and nomination to be a little weird. It’s a short post, here’s a lengthy excerpt:
GOP bosses talking about winnowing the field so that Mitt Romney doesn’t face a lengthy nomination battle against multiple foes ought to consider the alternative: Ron Paul goes to the convention with 40 percent of the delegates. That could happen if he’s the last rival standing sooner, rather than later.
With fewer winner-take-all primaries and caucuses, and Paul already proving an ability to garner up to 25 percent of the votes in a crowded field, it’s not a tough mathematical challenge to conclude that he would capture even more of the anti-Romney vote and roll into Tampa next summer as a trouble maker.
It’s not that Paul could threaten Romney’s nomination, but he could steal the coverage, much as Jesse Jackson did to Michael Dukakis, and Pat Buchanan to George H.W. Bush. (Reminder: Both nominees lost the election).
At the very least Paul would want a prime-time speech, and probably a whole lot more. Chairman of the Federal Reserve, perhaps? Just kidding, but …
Ok, here’s the weird part. Obama and Hillary Clinton went to the convention in Denver in 2008 in a dead heat. Actually, if the DNC hadn’t busted Florida and Michigan to half votes and reapportioned Michigan votes by giving 4 delegates from Hillary and all uncommitted delegates to Obama, Hillary would have been ahead. According to Crawford, Ron Paul would deserve a lot more than a prime time speech if he only had 40% of the vote, not even a dead heat. So, why is it that Hillary only got a prime time speech, no floor debate, and not even a legitimate roll call? How come Jesse Jackson and every other candidate from the Democratic primary system prior to 2008 got treated as legitimate politicians and their delegates accorded a voice but not Hillary’s? How do we explain a discrepancy like this? We should all be asking ourselves this question until we get an answer that makes sense. Oh, sure, the superdelegates all moved like osmosis to Obama’s column, pulled no doubt by a hypertonic money solution. But the elected delegates should have counted for something. And they didn’t.
So, either the Republicans are going to be a lot more honest about their convention than the Democrats or they will adopt the Democrats’ model from 2008 and negate the primaries altogether so that they don’t have to accommodate Ron Paul’s constituency. And if that’s the way the parties are going to go, why go through this expensive and painful process every 4 years? If the money guys are going to pick the male party nominee anyway, why bother with the façade of electoral legitimacy? We all know what our preisdential campaigns have boiled down to in the past 12 years. The preferred candidates get the nod. It will either be a money wing candidate with social conservative tendencies or a money wing candidate with socially moderate tendencies. Them’s the choices. Pick one.
If you don’t like your choices, and that’s all you’re going to get, you HAVE to go outside the parties and pick a different flavor of politician. Yes, it takes effort to find them on a ballot. No, there’s no guarantee your candidate is going to win, although it will be easier if as many people as possible show up to vote for the same person. That’s usually how it’s done. But at some point in time, enough of us have to decide that we have no other alternative and decide to pick someone else. It can be done. Just say no to both parties this year unless they give you a choice you can live with.
For a different take on the 2-party system, check out Virtually Speaking Susie’s interview with Mike Patterson from Occupy DC. Mike spells it out for the occupy doubters: the Occupy movement is not interested in becoming an arm of the Obama campaign. It doesn’t like Democrats any more than it likes Republicans right now. Both parties have let the American people down. What Occupy will turn into is a different question but it’s not there to support Obama, that’s for damn sure.
By the way, tune your bat channels for Virtually Speaking tonight when one of my favorite bloggers, Lenore Skenazy of FreeRangeKids is on to talk about what happened to American childhood. I’m convinced that there is a connection between fearmongering and strict behavioral controls of both parents and children and the goals of the right wing. I hope Jay Ackroyd and Lenore explore this connection. The one thing you can count on is that Lenore will bring her horror stories from modern day parenting. The fact that she is not exaggerating makes it all the more frightening. That’s tonight at 8:00pm EST. Virtually Speaking A-Z with Stuart Zechman and Virtually Speaking with Lenore Skenazy.
Here’s a little taste of Lenore:
This headline says it all: “SOPA Sponsor Rep. Lamar Smith to SOPA opponents: You don’t matter.“
Ok, good to know. I hope he’s not doing anything important when the internet giants decide to pull the plug temporarily for system maintenance.
For those of you who have made a resolution to be less of a slob this year (moi!), check out ApartmentTherapy’s homekeeping tips. Think of it as housecleaning for people who have better things to do with their time and less “impeccably fresh” Martha Stewart-esque attention to obsessive detail. Like, is it ok to clean your jeans in the freezer. Or, if your house is really messy, where do you start? It’s so overwhelming. Start with the bedroom. Here’s the list for deep cleaning your bedroom, step-by-step. You can do this. Er, *I* can do this.
Just do it.
Another one bites the dust: Sanofi closes its Bridgewater, NJ site. This happened faster than my former colleagues anticipated. I’m very sorry to hear this and hope that they’ve all been preparing for their Plan B’s. I’ve been getting a recent flood of LinkedIn invitations in the last week. It’s nervewracking, guys. All I can say is get out of NJ if you can. The money has dried up. You need to decide to not to live a precarious existence. Pack up the family and head west or at least mid-west. Scale down, regroup, renew and reclaim your dignity. To those of you who didn’t get an invitation to Cambridge, don’t beat yourselves up. I know how good you are. It’s nothing personal. It’s mostly politics and, unfortunately for Cambridge, it will *not* be getting all of the “best of the best”. One final thing, you will feel so much better once the shoe drops. I sleep a lot better these days. Good luck to all.
And now, a thing of beauty to relieve you of combat fatigue. This is a ballet of the seasons from a new version of Cinderella. The company is Belle Etudes in Arizona and the dancers are pretty young. The choreography is exquisite:
Filed under: General | Tagged: ballet, Barack Obama, Cinderella, Craig Crawford, Hillary Clinton, Jim DeMint, jon stewart, lenore skenazy, occupy dc, presidential primary 2008, Ron Paul, sanofi, the seasons, Virtually speaking | 40 Comments »