Gosh, it seems I have a lot to say today.
Charles Pierce is freaking out about the poll numbers. Oh, sure, it was all fun and games to poke at Obama until someone loses an election. After yesterday’s dystopian description of Obama’s campaign headquarters in Chicago that chilled me to the bone, Charles is backtracking today and telling the left to suck it up and vote for the bastard.
Not so fast, Charles. In fact, if the Democrats want to dodge this rendezvous with electoral obscurity, now is the time for voters to lay down the law, draw a line in the sand and say, “You Shall Not Pass!”. I’d make any grand bargain on Social Security and Medicare my rubicon but there are half a dozen other legitimate issues that Democrats should be forced to defend vigorously before voters yield. No, I am not afraid of Romney, believe it or not. At this point, the states are gleefully slashing through all of women’s reproductive rights and there are already 5 votes on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe. Democrats yielded women’s issues without much of a fight so they can’t fall back on that old trick anymore. I hate private equity firms and sons of rich family firms as much as anyone but Obama’s negotiations with Wall Street have been so godawful that it hardly makes a difference who’s the coldhearted Mr. Moneybucks in the White House. In this case, it is perfectly fair to talk about equivalence. Pierce just better hope that Democrats fare better in Congressional races.
My problem with Obama is that it’s not enough to have good intentions but a hostile opponent in Congress to blame stuff on. You need to look as though you’ve actually broken a sweat defending our rights and quality of life and Obama hasn’t. No one in my generation should settle for a Democratic president doing a lackluster job and then throwing up his hands in frustration and saying, “It’s inevitable that your life is going to suffer. Deal with it, late babyboomer. Sucks to be you.” I’m not settling for that. We knew the job was going to be tougher than average following a disaster like George W. Bush. He shouldn’t have run for the job if he wasn’t ready, and it was obvious that he wasn’t. No excuses. He had his chance to sit it out and wait but he had to have the White House now, now, now. So, now it’s his responsibility and solemn obligation not to screw us over even if it’s really hard to do.
But it’s not Pierce alone who is starting to panic and grasp at straws. Over at the Daily Beast, Michael Tomasky is testing the “Hillary-Biden VP Switch” idea again and seeing if it gets any more traction than it did before. I’m not sure Obama would get the bang for the buck everyone expects from this ticket though and in some respects, it might almost be worse.
For example, did you know that recently Hillary compared the VP position to being First Lady? That’s not necessarily derogatory but does touch on something that I think men just don’t get about powerful women, which I’ll get to in a moment. The reason why Hillary says VP is like First Lady is because although the VP can be an important and influential advisor to the president, constitutionally, the position doesn’t have much power. The VP can break ties in the Senate annnnd, that’s about it. Otherwise, the VP is just hanging around for the president to experience some catastrophic event. It’s sort of like being a political vulture or hyena. A carrion pol.
I just finished the Passage to Power by Robert Caro about LBJ’s Kennedy years and what happened to him when he was VP was a textbook case of what you do not ever want to happen to a person with as much power potential as LBJ. Johnson was a Senate powerhouse, a legislative genius who understood every representative and senator in Congress, their hidden desires and flaws, and how to manipulate those desires and timing to generate momentum and force legislation through. The Kennedy brothers brought Johnson in as VP in order to neutralize his power and they were exceedingly successful. They were so successful that they jeopardized their own policy agenda. And Johnson was miserable as VP. He was emasculated by the Kennedys who made sure that he couldn’t even make a trivial speech without having it cleared by the Attorney General. When JFK was assassinated, Johnson revealed himself to be a great leader. If he’d been as astute on Vietnam, we’d be worshipping him along with FDR and Lincoln. But if Kennedy hadn’t met his fate in Dallas, Johnson would have faded into obscurity and the Civil Rights Law of 1964 might never have happened. I’m no fan of Obama’s but even I wouldn’t wish that on him just so someone else could benefit.
I’m of the opinion that had Hillary wanted the VP in 2008, she could have had it. We don’t know how it all went down but my suspicion is that she knew that she would be de-balled like Johnson if she had accepted the position and so she pre-emptively asked for State if Obama won. And so the original choice for SOS, Joe Biden, switched places with Hillary.
So, assuming this is true, why would she want to be Obama’s VP now? My guess is that she wouldn’t. What really drives me up a wall about Tomasky’s post is that it reflects the guy’s point of view about what would save Obama’s ass in this election. The focus is still on saving Obama at all costs. Yes, he is tremendously inexperienced and doesn’t seem to be learning his job very well. Yes, he’s not a very good politician and doesn’t act like he likes being around legislators and gladhanding for votes. Yes, he made too many deals with Wall Street, the insurance companies, the religious right to the detriment of his base. Yes, the economy is terrible and he’s done nothing about unemployment. Yes, he’s planning to give away all the money the late baby boomers PREPAID into social security for their retirements. But somehow, the guys feel we’ve got to re-elect this man. I don’t understand it. It’s got to be a male graduate student guy thing, the cluelessness of being near the top of Maslow’s pyramid. I keep picturing that iconoclastic image of soldiers pushing the flag up Mt. Suribachi on Iwo Jima. So much struggle for so little payoff.
But that’s the problem. They act like Obama is the most-ut and those around him are expected to sacrifice their own needs for his future. I understand that Obama has this power over people. They want to help him achieve his own personal goals and it doesn’t seem that important that his goals should be subordinated to the welfare of the country. This is where the reasoning behind the guy thing breaks down. For that matter, some women don’t get it either.
But if that’s the case, why the Hell would a woman with Hillary’s power and ability continually put her own needs secondary to Obama’s?? We don’t expect Obama to sacrifice his ambitions for the good of the party or country. If I were her, I wouldn’t do it. I wouldn’t put myself in a four year sound proof booth just to help Obama achieve self-actualization as a two term president, country be damned. What would be in it for me? Would I be able to influence policy? Sha!, Obama’s smartest guys in the room, like Kennedy’s, aren’t going to let her anywhere near a lever of power. So, without the ability to affect policy, what is she reduced to but a series of ceremonial appearances where she would be dragged out in front of crowds of Democrats, like some hostage, to make Obama look good. At the end of four years, she’s going to be permanently associated with whatever failures Obama’s administration is notorious for without having had any opportunity to influence them. And with that she’s supposed to run for office in 2016? Like some 69 year old Chernyenko who the party is going to feel obliged to unenthusiastically endorse until some young whippersnapper beats her in the New Hampshire primary? Are you f^&*ing kidding me?
Did it never occur to these guys that maybe she has her own ambition that is independent of and does not make reference to Obama’s? If I were her, I’d never settle for less than the top spot because I would have the confidence to know I’d be good at the job. And if I couldn’t get the top spot, I’d leave politics behind and become a powerhouse on the outside, holding Obama’s feet to the fire on gender equality or education or scientific infrastructure or something equally important. There’s no point to being powerful, competent and smart if there’s no way to exercise it. And there’s apparently no place in American politics for a woman who is not seen as a traditional helpmeet to a man. But seriously, ladies, why do it for a dude who is not your husband and who is secretly driving you crazy with his bumbling incompetence?
Tell them to shove their shotgun wedding, Hillary.
Filed under: General | Tagged: Barack Obama, charles pierce, Civil Rights Act of 1964, First Lady, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Michael Tomasky, Passage to Power, Robert Caro, Robert Kennedy, VP Switch Rumor | 25 Comments »