According to Katiebird, there’s a bit of a circular firing squad going on in Twitter. Democrats are realizing they’ve gotten themselves into another fine mess with Obama. And you can always measure the discontent by the appearance of anti-Hillary posts popping up here and there. Apparently, she is now a neo-con, carrying out their secret agenda as crafted back in the Bush years. Bwahahahahahaaaaah!
Of course, that’s not what the people promoting the neocon agenda conspiracy theory are saying. Because that would be wrong without explicit proof. It’s the classic, “I didn’t say it was your fault, I said we’re going to blame you” strategy. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria. Without the US and the most prominent Secretary of State leading them, the people of North Africa and the middle east would live contentedly, like dumb animals, having absolutely no idea that they are being politically and economically oppressed, satisfied with their lot in life. They would never have a “Hey, we’re eating grass!” moment on their own.
I’m always amused by the Democrats who are dissatisfied with any kind of policy in the middle east. No matter what it is, it’s *always* they wrong one. Aggressive intervention against Iran is justifiably horrifying. But so are sanctions to them. What are we left with? Sternly worded letters? Maybe we should just ignore Iran and hope it goes away. That’s fine with me except when kids are too quiet, I start to wonder what they’re up to. Keeping an eye on them might be a good idea. Is that OK with the Democrats? Can we peer over our shoulders once in awhile and tell them to stop that and stay on their side of the car? Or is this too, none of our business?
But why not blame Hillary for all foreign policy problems that she most likely had an enigmatic part in? Bay of Pigs? Hillary. Vietnam? Hillary. Bikini Atoll nuclear tests? Hillary, Hillary, Hillary. In fact, anyone who has gotten a radiation induced cancer since the Manhattan Project, that was probably Hillary’s doing. Just call her Hiroshima Hillary. She’s always secretly been a neocon.
And she’s married to the Big Dawg, who never gets tired of wheeling and dealing. He’s interested in reforming Medicare because it’s going to start eating up our money at an accelerated pace soon. Better get a grip on it before some Randy young Republican decides it would be easier on the wealthy to just abolish it altogether. You know, rein in medical costs, maybe open it up to everyone and expand the pool with healthier individuals? Stuff like that, stuff we haven’t tried yet. I could see Bill Clinton doing a Mary Poppins, cheerfully conscripting some nitwit into doing something he wouldn’t do otherwise. Or he could be entirely evil.
Hillary probably put him up to it.
People are going to believe what they want to believe. Some Democrats have said that the result of the last four years wouldn’t have been different with Hillary in charge. I beg to differ. It’s surprising that the Obama fans can’t see the truth about Hillary. It is this: The Bankers Didn’t Support Hillary. No. They supported Obama. And Obama has been nothing if not attentive to their needs.
So, you know, you can blame the Clintons because they are convenient targets. I have no doubt that the people who have taken over the Democratic party have analyzed what makes Democrats tick and can manipulate the message to make sure the Clintons look really, really bad. And they’re not perfect, not by a long shot. What humans are? So, this is made somewhat easier.
But it still doesn’t solve the problem of Obama. He’s the one who’s been at the helm for 4 years. Somehow, I can’t even in my wildest imagination come up with a scenario where Hillary is as indulgent towards the wealthy and well connected as Obama has been. I’ve tried making her out to be out of touch, neglectful of the unemployed, callous towards the hapless homeowner, solicitous towards the health insurance industry, indifferent to the rights of women and permissive towards the banking industry. I’ve tried but I just can’t.
I’ve lost interest in this campaign. Maybe that’s by design. Maybe both parties would prefer that the some of us sit it out this year. You know and I know and Paul Krugman knows that regardless of who gets the office in November, we’re screwed.
Of course, there is a better candidate available. But the Democratic loyalists keep getting played into scurrying away from her like she’s Kryptonite. There’s still time, you know. If you want to change the dynamic, you have to go bold.
In the meantime, I’ve got better things to do than watch the Democratic loyalists get played like a bunch of low information Fox News viewers, continually going against their own best interests.
Occupy wants to OccupytheDNC in Charlotte, NC. Hmmm, if it’s anythng like Denver in 2008, expect for the city to be on lockdown with thousands and thousands of riot geared cops and the national guard ready to throw your ass into jail the minute you step off the curb.
I’m not saying it’s a bad idea. In fact, if I were the DNC, I’d go easy on Occupy for PR purposes. At this point, it needs all the good PR it can get. But what I anticipate is a lot of bloody heads, brutality and marginalization of people who are determined to give the 99% a voice.
The bloody heads and brutality I’ve come to expect. It’s the marginalization by the Obama administration that I find indefensible.