Injustice Entrenched

There are songs you can’t get out of your head …. and then there’s the very occasional blog post. Regarding the foreclosure crisis specifically “from The Honorable Elizabeth W. Magner’s recent decision busting Wells Fargo,” Lambert explains that the errors are embedded in the code:

“Code is law.” Literally.

Maybe so. Now let’s look at law and code together. Here’s an extract from The Honorable Elizabeth W. Magner’s recent decision busting Wells Fargo [PDF], In Re Jones. It starts:

In this case, Wells Fargo testified that every home mortgage loan was administered by its proprietary computer software.

That is, code. I’ve reformatted Magner’s text into a table with two columns, which can be read left to right, top to bottom.

Column A (“Code should follow law”) contains content from the world of the judical system: Testimony, evidence, orders, plans, contracts, judgements, “the record,” and last but not least, the note and the mortgage.
Column B (“Code is law”) contains content from the world of information systems: Databases, coding, online forms, software manuals, and data entry procedures set up by Wells Fargo.
Note especially the key at the bottom of the table.

Lambert has made a table matching The Law …. with …. The Code :

First, this arrangement of Magner’s text makes one possible “theory of the case” clear: The incentives for fraud — the costs, the fees, and the interest — are all coded green, and are all in column B; the world of Wells Fargo’s proprietary information system. Follow the rents. Every time Wells makes a “mistake,” Wells makes money! After mistakes were incentivized, mistakes were made! (Could Wells Fargo’s home mortgage loan administation system actually have been a profit center?) Now, it is true that this scheme — if it is a scheme — does not conform to William Blacks’ “recipe” for optimized accounting control fraud, but it’s a nice little revenue stream all the same, and it falls within Black’s definition: “Control fraud is a term that criminologists use to refer to cases in which the persons controlling a seemingly legitimate entity [here, Wells Fargo’s proprietary computer software] use it as a weapon to defraud.”

. . .

Let’s take another look at Table I. Suppose I were a bankster, or a bankster’s lawyer, and I liked the green stuff in column B and wanted to keep what I’ve taken and take more of it. I might see Magner’s decision as a sort of “one from column A, one from column B” mish-mash that prevents me from doing God’s work. So why not get rid of that Column A entirely? Why not make code, law? That’s a clean solution, since all those pesky accountability issues go away. “Incorrect amortization” would become “incorrect amortization,” “misapplication of payments,” “misapplication of payments,” and so on and so forth. After all, if I were an oligarch, that’s exactly the kind of system I would want, right? Rent extraction without accountability. And there’s… not a precedent, exactly, that’s oldthink legalese, but a prior example, and in the same industry, too: MERS. Christopher Peterson, a law professor at the University of Utah, wrote of the “wholesale transfer of mortgages to a privatized database” [code] in Harpers:

What’s happened is that, almost overnight, we’ve switched from democracy in real-property recording to oligarchy in real-property recording. There was no court case behind this, no statute from Congress or the state legislatures. It was accomplished in a private corporate decision. The banks just did it.

With MERS, code replaced law. Going forward, code is law.

There’s really no clear way to summarize this post.  At this point we’re not even half way….

There’s more detail – more evaluation… Go Read the POST!

About these ads

4 Responses

  1. Part of what scares me about this post isn’t the specifics of the mortgage crises and fraud.

    It’s realizing that this has probably already happened to our elections. There is NO way to account for too many of our elections (there is at least one town in Kansas still hand-counting ballots — but’s pretty rare, even in this cow-state)

    How can freedom and democracy exist where the crimes can be hidden in the deep recesses of compiled code?

    • I think the same. Arg!

      I don’t think people care because they have become so tribal – as long as thier tribe wins they don’t seem to care how that happens at all.

    • Elections conducted with legal paper ballots as the first footprint could in theory be counted by hand. They can not be so easily root-fraudulated in secret the way that touch-screen ballots or other paperless systems can. So perhaps a good first step is to force the “legal paper ballotization” of all currently digitised vote-casting systems. But that could only be forced by hugely embarrassing voter boycotts in the no-legal-paper-ballot states.

      If “Democrats” and “liberals” care more about good government the way they like to claim they do, they will all boycott every purely-digital election in every state until the so-called “Democratic” party realizes it will never have a hope of getting any votes in the purely-digital states until it forces the legal-paper-ballotization of elections in those states.

  2. o/t… Joe Scarborough made a reference to cheeto idiots having cheeto dust in their hair. He said he had just given them a clip to use against him.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 459 other followers

%d bloggers like this: