Tuesday Afternoon Update

It’s just a Tuesday afternoon in July, but there is lots of news today!

The Senate has finally voted to end the debate on the bill to extend unemployment benefits to millions of out-of-work Americans. Some of these people are now getting by (if you can call it that) on nothing but food stamps.

An estimated 2 million Americans have seen their benefits run out over the past two months while the legislation has been stalled in the partisan impasse.

“Finally, finally, finally,” said Senator Barbara A. Mikulski, Democrat of Maryland. She called the unemployment insurance program a social compact with American workers that meant “when you hit a speed bump and have to be laid off through no fault of your own, there will be a safety net so that you do not fall.”

Republicans said they backed the idea of extending benefits, but were determined to prevent the costs from being piled onto the mounting deficit.

“We believe the federal debt has grown to an alarming level, where it is threatening the future of our children and grandchildren,” said Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate.

That makes no sense. I guess the Republicans want to starve a lot of children today to save some money for rich children in the future. Or something.

As expected, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to sent the Elena Kagan nomination for SCOTUS to the floor for a vote.

Just one Republican, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, broke ranks with his party to support Ms. Kagan.

In a lengthy speech supporting her, Mr. Graham questioned the Senate’s approach to judicial confirmations, taking colleagues — including President Obama when he was a senator — to task for basing their votes on philosophy rather than a nominee’s qualifications and character.

Mr. Graham said that Ms. Kagan was not someone he would have chosen, “but the person who did choose — President Obama — I think chose wisely.”

Yeah, he chose another DINO who thinks just like him. Big whoop. No wonder Lindsay Graham likes her. I guess the rest of the Republicans were hoping for a Clarence Thomas clone.

Naughtymonkeys linked to this story in the comments on the morning post. There were lots of tweets yesterday that BP had been caught doctoring photos on their website. I thought the story was pretty far fetched, but it has now reached the Washington Post, so it might be legit.

An enlarged version of the photograph reveals flaws in the editing job. One of the 10 images sticks down into the head of one of the people sitting in front of the wall, while another piece of the image is separated from the other side of the head by jagged white space. The right side of the same image also hangs down below the area on which the video feeds were projected.

John Aravosis pointed out the alterations Monday evening on his Americablog.com and observed, “I guess if you’re doing fake crisis response, you might as well fake a photo of the crisis response center.” The photo doctoring comes as BP has promised transparency in a bid to regain the public’s trust.

BP claimed this was no big deal, but John Aravosis has an extensive response to the BP spokesman’s claims. I don’t have enough tech expertise to tell if Aravosis is right or not, but this seems in character for BP based on the experience of the past three months.

Guess what? More leaks have sprouted around the BP containment cap: 5 small leaks have been identified in Gulf well, Thad Allen says

“We’ve found nothing that would be consequential,” said Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the national incident commander overseeing the spill, in a news conference Tuesday afternoon.

Supposedly the Feds have authorized BP to keep going with the test for another day, despite the leaks. I still think BP is running the show. At this point, it’s a game of chicken. Neither BP nor Allen wants to be bad guy who loosens the cap and starts the oil gushing into the Gulf again.

British PM David Cameron is visiting DC today. He says he feels our pain: British PM says he understands the anger ‘across America’ for BP

“It is BP’s role to cap the leak” and compensate people affected by it, he said during a visit to Washington to meet with President Obama. Cameron said he is in regular touch with the leadership of BP, a British-based company.

Too bad he doesn’t tell BP to start being fully transparent about what is really going on down there at the site of the blowout.

There are some reports about the joint Congressional hearings going on today. I wasn’t able to find a live feed this morning.

Gulf well regulators accused of failure

The number of inspectors at the US government agency that oversees oil production in the Gulf of Mexico has barely increased in the past 20 years, while the number of deep-water wells they supervise has risen almost ninefold.

The agency now has only 60 inspectors to examine nearly 4,000 facilities, a congressional hearing heard on Tuesday.

Obama, Bush Faulted for Lax Offshore Drill Regulation

The Obama administration continued a decade-long pattern of lax U.S. regulation of offshore oil and natural gas drilling that led to BP Plc’s spill in the Gulf of Mexico, lawmakers investigating the incident said.

Regulators during George W. Bush’s presidency failed to protect safety and the environment, and actions by President Barack Obama’s Interior Department were “more cosmetic than substantive,” Representative Bart Stupak, a Michigan Democrat, said today at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing.

Decisions dating to the start of Bush’s administration played a role in the BP spill, the worst in U.S. history, Stupak said at the hearing examining the April 20 explosion on a drilling rig leased by BP. Congressional investigators said the Interior Department under Bush offered incentives for drillers without imposing safety standards.

Andrew Leonard has a new post up at Salon on Obama’s Elizabeth Warren mess

Nobody has a better claim to be the first director of the CFPB than Warren. She dreamed up the idea of such an agency in the first place, and she has been a tireless consumer advocate her entire career. Her tenure as chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel looking into TARP has been dogged — and certainly put her at odds with Tim Geithner on several occasions. Never mind the quibbles; nominating Warren would make a bold statement that Obama’s intent to ensure bank reform will have teeth.

But make no mistake — the appointment will almost undoubtedly be filibustered by Republicans, and it is a tough call as to whether Warren would ultimately be confirmed. Too much of the coverage of the Warren controversy assumes that if Obama just has the guts to nominate her, it’s a done deal. But it’s not. As with bank reform in general, the power to confirm Warren resides in a handful of so-called moderate Republicans. It’s a sad and depressing commentary on the state of affairs in American politics today, but even with 59 Democratic senators, Scott Brown, R-Mass., has more power to decide a Warren appointment than Obama.

I’m in the camp that says appoint her anyway — and if the GOP won’t confirm her, then make a unilateral recess appointment at the first opportunity. I don’t think you could ask for a better narrative backdrop to the midterm election campaign than the sight of a united Republican Party filibustering the appointment of a consumer advocate ready to run an agency devoted to protecting Americans against the depredations of Wall Street. I would love to watch the likes of Republican senators Jim DeMint and Richard Shelby lay into Warren during televised hearings. And I would love to see Obama stick it to them by pushing her appointment through regardless.

I haven’t been following this story closely, but Dee talked about it on the previous thread. Shirley Sherrod: White House Forced My Resignation

Shirley Sherrod, the USDA’s former director of rural development in Georgia, said USDA deputy undersecretary Cheryl Cook called her Monday and said the White House wanted her to resign, the Associated Press reports.

“They called me twice,” Sherrod told the AP, noting that she was driving when she received the calls. “The last time they asked me to pull over the side of the road and submit my resignation on my Blackberry, and that’s what I did.”

Sherrod…became the focus of scrutiny from Fox News and conservative blogs over remarks she gave at an NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet on March 27. A video of a portion of her remarks were posted on a conservative blog, giving the impression that Sherrod admitted to discriminating against a white farmer as an employee of the USDA.

The comments were taken out of context, however. In her remarks that day, Sherrod was recounting a story that pre-dates her tenure at the USDA by more than two decades. Sherrod says in her story that Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted; Chapter 12 was instituted for family farmers in 1986, while Sherrod was appointed to head the USDA’s Rural Development office in Georgia just last July. Furthermore, the point of Sherrod’s story is that race is not an issue.

Sherrod has said the video excerpt did not include the full story of her relationship with the farmer, with whom she says she became friends after helping him avoid foreclosure.

As I said, it’s a busy news day. So far I can’t find anything about BP employees who testified at the Congressional hearing. I know at least one of them claimed he can come because of “health problems.”

Please feel free to discuss these or other stories in the comments. What are you hearing?

76 Responses

  1. Iran propaganda is going ahead full steam.

    Valerie Plame (Yes, that one) has a documentary coming out proclaiming that Iran does in fact have a “secret” nuke program.

    Iran or Bust!

    *Why her first post-Libby work involves a documentary about Iran, I have no idea.*

  2. I haven’t listened to the Moody Blues in years. I still like them!

  3. I guess the Republicans want to starve a lot of children today to save some money for rich children in the future. Or something.

    BB, you said that just right. The GOP is heartless. I wish the Democrats were a real alternative to heartless.

    • Me too. {sigh….}

    • The difference between the Dems and GOP which held this up was very simple. The GOP wanted the unemployment extension to be paid for with current stimulus funds, which are still available. The Dems wanted it to be new spending.

      End of story. Both sides have to be heartless not to compromise over that.

      • Anyone in Washington (which is booming while the rest of the country is struggling) playing politics with unemployment benefits right now should be ashamed of themselves, but of course they are not only heartless, but shameless too. These are people’s lives they are playing with. It’s sick.

        Democrats said they were going to bring a “new kind of politics.” Epic fail.

        • Word!

        • Why is it that ALL Republicans in the Senate are AGAINST extending unemployment benefits, as they were against increasing the minimum wage (even $2 over 3 yrs), while advocating the permanent extension of Bush’s tax cuts for the rich?

          Isn’t this a case where we know who the bad guys are. Not that Dems don’t have their faults, but this really isn’t one of them.

          • No. As usual, to the less partisan, there is nuance for and against both sides. They are both wrong in the extreme.

          • You’re right, Ralph.

            There’s $37 billion of the stimulus still unspent. Repubs wanted to use that for extending unemployment benefits, but Dems said no.

            Obama needed something to demagogue.

            The Repubs were never “against” extending the benefits.

            Thanks for helping explain that.

          • Not in this case. This just reminds me of the attitude of the MSM who are afraid to point fingers but fall back on this opinions-on-the-shape-of-the-Earth-differ.

            It just looks like Republicans are NEVER to be blamed, even when warranted. The most you get “both are at fault” or “both are equally bad.”

          • The GOP is heartless. I said that in my original comment to BB, and I do NOT agree with the “Republicans wanted to extend benefits without increasing deficit” canard. Their concern over the Deficit is not convincing to me. But I don’t think the Dems are a real alternative, they are not the hero to the bad guy. They are just lucky the GOP sucks so much that they don’t actually have to be good–just point to the GOP’s lack of a political soul and score points during election time and do very little with that capital that is actually befitting of a “Democrat” the rest of the time. The Dems came in with the wind at their backs, promising a “new kind of politics,” and instead the politics has just gotten worse.

          • Then what was the GOP doing in this case? It sure wasn’t a winner with anyone. Did they do it to intentionally lose votes? That’s the explanation that is left.

          • WTV,

            I’m not going to argue with you about this crop of Dems. They let us down and there’s no way around it.

            I didn’t even care about a “new kind of politics”. I thought for once, they would push a real Democratic agenda, just like Rightwingers dis when they had Congress. It’s hard to believe that they never had anywhere near the type of majority Dems now enjoy, considering all the crap they foisted upon us.

            I just get annoyed when people behave as if Republicans are never to blame, even if all signs point in that direction.

          • Ralph, They created the deficit… I just don’t buy their concern. It’s not sincere. But, the Dems should have been able to grill the GOP like a panini long before it got to this point.

          • When the WH is asking Congress to cut food stamps to pay for charter schools, I just can’t see all that much difference. Yes, the Repubs are mostly worse, but the Dems love to cave to the Repubs, so…

          • But they didn’t create the deficit all by themselves. Lots of Dems went along with the Bush tax cuts and pushed a lot of the spending. We’ve had a bi-partisan mess for a long time.

            I don’t mind saying the GOP is at fault, it certainly is, but so are the Dems. When both sides are a f*cked up as these, there is no side blameless.

          • One of the many things that bother me is the fact that the Dems had no plans to fix or put things right going into a 60 seat majority. If I thought my team was gonna rule I would have plans and hit the floor running. Totally wasted opportunity. If these people worked for me they would all be fired. <-(Irony)

          • True that the Dems didn’t hold Bush accountable when it actually could have made a difference but instead went-along-to-get-along, especially when they got control of Congress after the 2006 midterms. I was jumping up and down out of excitement and had tears in my eyes when I found out Nancy Pelosi was likely going to become Speaker of the House. I was so relieved as a Democrat and so damn proud of Nancy. I was in awe. Later on while skimming Dailykos (or maybe it was Arianna’s tabloid), I found out about Pelosi “impeachment is off the table” shenanigans. My heart literally sank.

            As I said, the current lot of Dems don’t actually behave like Dems, they just hide behind how much the GOP sucks to score political points when it’s time to get elected and the rest of the time largely avoid actually doing what they were elected to do. But just like Obama/Dems have to answer for what is happening under Obama’s watch, so too does Bush/GOP have to answer for what happened under Bush. If they cared so much about the deficit, they shouldn’t have screwed the pooch and stank up the joint. And, Democrats shouldn’t only be bothered _when it’s convenient_ to get really really worked up over the mess that was made under the other party–this is often only at the 11th hour when the Dems are desperate for votes or enough public support to push their corporatist policies through. The Dems should have fought the deficit argument much more effectively when it came to healthcare, but what they did was really enable the argument….

            The GOP thinks corporate welfare and tax cuts for the rich and unnecessary war is lovely–our deficit be damned–but healthcare reform (and now unemployment benefits) after they’ve fubar-ed everything up and people are suffering as a result and need the social safety net to pull themselves back up, wow, that’s the stuff that really wakes up the GOP’s latent concern about the deficit. And, Obama went along with this shit… he was more eager to sell the bill as “deficit-neutral” than he was to sell the public option.

            When the WH is asking Congress to cut food stamps to pay for charter schools, I just can’t see all that much difference. Yes, the Repubs are mostly worse, but the Dems love to cave to the Repubs, so…

            Exactly BB. And I don’t think we solve the caving of the Dems to Repubs by our caving to the Dems.

        • I think we coyotes have been waiting on that catapult kit from Acme too long now. We need to try something else. ;-)

  4. Mother Jones race baits a little more.

    Drum

    “Our Summer Race War Heats Up”

    Hoo boy. Conservatives apparently aren’t going to back down from ever more overt appeals to racial resentment this summer.

    Obama’s opponents just won’t quit playing the race card. :shock: :

    • I don’t think they have any idea how many Independents and Moderates they’re pushing away from the Democratic Party by doing this.

      It’s pathetic.

      • I believe those paying for this renewed race card campaign do realize…and it’s what they are paying for : The destruction of the Dem party.f At this point, MJ is a tool towards that end, as is most of the professional “left” press imo The other result is many people don’t want to hear about race anymore …the the boy who cried wolf effect ….another win for the bonus class

  5. From correntewire No reconciliation in 2011

    This could be good or bad, depending. Less things will pass the Senate though in any case.

    Under the enforcement resolution, Democrats can no longer use a parliamentary tactic known as budget reconciliation next year — a process Democrats had hoped might allow them to pass key pieces of legislation, such as a jobs bill, with 51 votes in the Senate, as opposed to the usual 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.

    Under the arcane rules of the Senate, budget reconciliation can only be used if it was written into the budget rules passed the previous year. With no full budget, there can be no reconciliation. As a consequence, Democrats lose a valuable tool for passing budget-related items on a majority-rules vote. Stimulus and jobs measures, if they combined short-term spending with longer-term deficit reduction, would have qualified for reconciliation.

    I had almost forgotten about this little nugget.

    • The Senate should just close up and go home. They hardly get anything done now. And they are going to make it harder?

  6. “That makes no sense. I guess the Republicans want to starve a lot of children today to save some money for rich children in the future. Or something.”

    You have often taken the time, with painstaking detail, to explain a situation. Yet, this is the best that you can come up with because it involves Republicans? Really? It’s so high school.

  7. NAACP and Obama are trying to walk back the Sherrod forced resignation. They have issued a join statement putting the blame on Vilsack. They claim they were snookered by Fox News. You mean they couldn’t just watch the video for themselves before forcing her to resign?

    http://www.naacp.org/press/entry/naacp-statement-on-the-resignation-of-shirley-sherrod1/

    • I don’t understand why the NAACP ever went after her to begin with since this was video from their conference. WTF?

      • They didn’t even bother to watch the whole video. There is another issue though. I just posted below: Sherrod won a discrimination suit against the USDA last year. Her group got millions from the Feds. Could it be that is the real reason for her firing?

        http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/20/official-ousted-ag-department-took-usda-court-won/

        • Could be the reason. That was a big settlement and. if anything is “out of the way” about it, it could be embarassing to the administration.

          Or maybe they just screwed the whole thing up?

        • Interesting. Explains why Vilsack wants her gone.

          Read about an hour ago the entire matter is under review at the W.H.

          Want to make a wager on what they will do?

          • I imagine they will hire her back or give her another job. It would be too embarrassing not to now. But will Vilsack be the fall guy? I vote yes.

    • Couldn’t they just ask the people that were at their own banquet in march?

      “Sherrod served as director of rural development in Georgia until she came under fire for remarks she gave at an NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet on March 27.”

      Doesn’t anybody know yet that vidio clips lie?

      • The video was made by and belongs to the NAACP. The head of the organization was just on Rachel’s show. Mostly he was defending his own actions. He failed to reveal that the full video was in their own library. He tried to make it sound like they made a mistake yesterday because they didn’t have the video and had to wait to get it from some other source. Guess he doesn’t have keys to his own building.

        I was not impressed. Total f-up by Vislack, White House, and NAACP. But so what – she’s just a girl.

        BTW – Sherrod’s father was murdered by a member of the Klan when she was 17.

        • Shirley is on Anderson Cooper right now. She said the WH had to be involved in her firing. I’m sure she’s right.

          • The farmer she helped is talking right now. He says the whole thing is ridiculous. They helped him save his farm. I’m so glad you posted about this, Dee.

          • Missed it. I just set my TIVO to record the re-run.

          • Watching Anderson now. Benjamin Jealous is on – blah, blah, blah. Anderson is nailing him. Rachel let him get away with blathering.

          • He sounded like a dope–trying and failing to cover up his own stupidity.

        • WTF? So now if Fox sends the NAACP an email ordering it to disband–it will? Heck of a job, they’ll never steer you wrong.

          • I don’t get why these people are so afraid of the right wing.

          • We don’t know how to be in the majority anymore. Boyce Watkins just said we need to be humble enough to admit when we’re wrong, and he apologized. All well and good, but we’d be a lot better off not being led around by the nose and making these snap judgments that affect lives and can’t necessarily be taken back very easily.

          • I totally agree, Seriously.

          • I think if you walk up to a Dem congressman and tell them you’re a Repub, they’ll pee their pants. No balls, figuratively speaking of course. :-)

          • Yeah, unless you get unlucky and happen upon the Congressman who’ll smack you ten ways from Sunday. :)

            Seriously, though, I hope this is another McCrystal Switcharoo where O tries to position himself for maximum suckitude then expects us to worship him for doing the no-brainer thing, because what in the world is this woman’s crime? Going way beyond the call to help people? Being competent? Giving a damn? NOT IN OUR WHITE HOUSE! Um, way to look like complete idiots.

  8. BP’s biggest problem here is lack of photoshopping skills! They need to hire me! I have a new Wacom Pen and Touch tablet and you should see how good my selections are! No square heads, no jagged-ees

    Just kidding. (not about my new photoshopping skills, tho, but I prefer to use them for nice sharp photos of my family, instead of evil.)

    How did our Gulf Coast get taken over by scumbags? Oh yeah, our little white hatted good-guy Democrats let it happen. Cuz, you know Democrats are SOOOO much better than Republicans at looking after the “small people”.

    LOL.

  9. ROFLOL! Digby first comes out punching against the WH, then backs down and accepts Vilsack’s word that he did the firing all on his lonesome. Yeah, right.

    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/white-houses-weak-back-hand.html

    She’s like March. She comes in like a lion and goes out like a lamb.

    • lol! reminds me of DC Dems generally…how many times did we hope they would do something besides wetting their pants and humbly caving in at Bush 2 Senate hearings? Talk about Lucy fooling CB with the football!

      • This is amazing. Shirley “job back” Sherrod just friended me on Facebook. She must have seen this post.

  10. I can’t respect thieves and scumbags who can’t even get a simple photo shop lie right. This is like fighting a bill from a hotel you never heard of in your spouse’s pocket while doing the laundry. They don’t even care enough about you to to be careful and tidy up after themselves. That’s almost as bad , if not worse than the infidelity imo

    In my day they would have had real people inhabiting the Potemkin office ! Today they can’t even photo-shop decently…this standard slide is appalling .

    • opps well that was a Freudian slip . it should read : it’s like finding a bill…

  11. Even when the dems have the majority the Republicans and their wing nut minions are in charge. Wait maybe that was the plan anyway. Let’s face it. In the post Ronnie Reagan era there are no democrats anymore. I don’t think their are any republicans anymore either.

    • A scandal within a scandal. And the WH will probably make several stupid moves without knowing the whole deal until it’s too late. Incompetence is as incompetence does.

      I think they are so wrapped up in their race card political efforts (ala primaries) that they couldn’t let Shirley’s story take away from that effort, even if that means running her out on a rail unfairly. Truth and fairness have nothing to do with this WH.

    • Just want to stick a comment in here somewhere about the W.H. I see on my tv that various people are trying to suggest that the W.H. did not know about the Sherrod firing until after the fact.

      Sherrod’s position is a political appointment. She can not be fired without the W.H. knowing about it. Firing a political appointee without Presidential permission is absolute political suicide. Shirley obviously knows that given what she said on Anderson Cooper.

  12. BB, I have to say I am with the Republicans on this unemployment benefits issue. Remember the big Obama speech and photo op a few months ago regarding PayGo and the need to fund new programs by cutting elsewhere? It’s law now, doesn’t take effect until next year (I think), but what the heck is wrong with starting now, taking some of the unspent “stimulus” line of credit to fund this? Or asking each member of Congress to forego one or two earmarks to fund this?

    Heck, that’s what Americans are doing across this country on a daily basis, making tough choices to stay solvent, sacrificing one need for the other, and there is no reason our government can’t be forced to do the same. It has to start somewhere, it could easily have started here, especially in light of the fact that the “stimulus” funds allocated so far have done little to jump start the economy. Nancy Pelosi said that unemployment benefits are great “job creators”, she should have been called on that statement and forced to use those unspent “stimulus” funds, which are supposedly for just that.

    • Because the only way to save our economy is to increase spending to create jobs, not make more poor people who can’t buy anything. Our economy runs on consumer spending. That means we need consumers who have some money to spend.

      What is wrong with making rich people and corporations pay a bit more in taxes and contribute to the greater good? Absolutely nothing. But the Republicans would rather starve poor children so super wealthy people can salt more money away that won’t help the economy.

      Governments aren’t the same as regular people.

      • Yes. And governments are nothing like businesses. Put the debt in perspective with respect to GDP. It’s certainly a bit high right now, but it’s not horribly high. Our only way forward is to create jobs. You do that by spending. Not by cutting almost non existent taxes on the rich (or mega businesses) down to 0. That’s been proven over and over again to not have any stimulus effect.

        But you also can’t stimulate the economy by bailing out too big to fail when in reality they should fail. And bailing out the health insurance companies… wow, that was a winner.

        Yea, we’ve got Reagan/Bush in the white house, cowardly Dems in congress, and a media all to happy to fetch any stick thrown. We’re so screwed.

        • You are right on all counts but the same amount of money would have been spent and stimulus generated whether it came from unused “porkulus” funds or from new spending. After all the porkulus funds spent so far have proven that those old ear mark projects don’t create jobs for shit. They are just payback for some contributors and a few rubes.

          They would be better off to double the amount available for unemployment with some of the porkulus. That might be helpful.

          • Yeah, but that’s assuming the Repubs are sincere. It’s always some excuse with them, if their bluff ever gets called they’ll just find a new one. We care about the unemployed, but…

  13. Arthur gets right to the point. The Democrats are not weak. Both parties are just evil.

    F*ck Your Optics

    The Democrats will oppress, brutalize, impoverish and murder those who are not the ruling class, BUT — since they are mercifully not crazy, not like those frothing, sputtering, Neanderthal Republicans — the Democrats will know exactly what they’re doing every step of the way. But in their hearts, the Democrats actually know these are horrible things to do, but, well, ya see, they just can’t help it. They’re weak.

    Now, doesn’t that make you feel much, much better? Of course it does! As Digby might say: “We’re 2% less shitty than Pure Evil! It’s all we’ve got!”

    That doesn’t make me feel one bit better!

  14. New post about Shirley Sherrod.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 256 other followers