• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    katiebird on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    jenn on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    riverdaughter on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    katiebird on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    katiebird on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    churl on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    jenn on Gallows humor about Pharm…
    Sweet Sue on Veg. Bwahahahahahhh!
    ownaa on PPACA FAQ: Affordability and S…
    riverdaughter on Veg. Bwahahahahahhh!
    katiebird on Veg. Bwahahahahahhh!
    t on PPACA FAQ: Affordability and S…
    katiebird on PPACA FAQ: How much are penalt…
    grayslady on PPACA FAQ: How much are penalt…
    t on PPACA FAQ: Affordability and S…
  • Categories


  • Tags

  • Archives

  • History

  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • Assault weapon sale for a cause…
      Organizations do a variety of activities for fundraising. When I was in high school we would have sandwich and bake sales. Girl Scouts sell cookies and the masses beg for Thin mints and Do-se-does. 5k runs are also popular with causes and charities. An Ohio personhood activist is selling assault weapons and ammo for the [...]
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • Michael Hastings
      died in a car accident.  He was most famous for reporting on General McChrystal’s attitude towards civilian authority, and ending his career. Buzzfeed has a good reminiscence. There is only one rule of writing which matters: tell your readers the truth as you know it.  Michael understood that rule. It is interesting to me that [...]
  • Top Posts

Monday Morning News and Views


Good Morning Conflucians!! It’s Monday again.

It sounds kind of funny to call this a slow news day with everything that is going on. Of course the earthquake in Chile is still big news. Troops in Chile are trying to prevent thirsty or starving people from “looting” grocery stores in order to survive. According to the BBC story, Chile’s president is appealing for international help to feed people, but God forbid they should get any of the food that is sitting around in Chilean grocery stores.

I guess the reason it feels like a slow news day to me is that, while there are lots of depressing and even dramatic events happening around the country and the world, the people who should be making changes happen in Washington, D.C. are doing nothing except make things worse.


Last Thursday, President Obama gave his trademark “sneaky middle finger”
to Republicans at his fake “health care summit.”


Or was that just his way of letting all of us ordinary Americans know what he thinks of us?

Also on Thursday, Congress reauthorized the Patriot Act, extending some provisions that were set to expire. President Obama signed the bill into law on Saturday night when his cowardly act would be least likely to be noticed. From the ACLU website:

Year-Long Extension Contains No Privacy Or Civil Liberties Safeguards

The House today passed a one-year extension of three expiring Patriot Act provisions without making much-needed changes to the overly broad surveillance bill. The provisions of the Patriot Act which were extended – the John Doe roving wiretap provision, Section 215 or the “library records” provision and the never before used “lone wolf” provision – all lack proper privacy safeguards. The Senate passed the extension by voice vote late last night.

“Congress refuses to make reforming the Patriot Act a priority and continues to punt this crucial issue down the road,” said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “Once again, we have missed an opportunity to put the proper civil liberties and privacy protections into this bill. Congress should respect the rule of law and should have taken this opportunity to better protect the privacy and freedom of innocent Americans. We shouldn’t have to live under these unconstitutional provisions for another year.”

And a more to the point piece at the ACLU Blog of Rights provides a list of some of the provisions that have been extended:

Both the House and Senate had bills that would have improved the Patriot Act. The Senate bill even had the support of the White House. But instead of passing the much-needed reforms, Congress:

•Reauthorized Section 206, the “roving wiretap” provision that allows the FBI to wiretap a phone without having to provide the target’s name or even phone number. And unlike other law enforcement agencies, the FBI doesn’t even have to get permission to tap the specific phone before they tap it. The House bill would have required the government to name either the person or the place it wanted to tap.

•Reauthorized Section 6001, a.k.a. the “lone wolf” provision. Section 6001 authorizes the government to get secret surveillance orders against individuals who are not associated with any international terrorist group or foreign nation. This handy-dandy tool in the FBI’s arsenal isn’t so handy—according to the Justice Department, it’s never been used.

•Reauthorized Section 215, a.k.a. the “library provision”: Section 215 lowers the bar on the standard of proof needed to get a court order to access private info. Before Patriot, “specific and articulable facts” showing that the target of surveillance was the agent of a foreign power was required. After Patriot, Section 215 allows the FBI to only claim that the items or information sought is relevant to an investigation. That means the person being surveilled doesn’t necessarily have to be the target of the investigation or even be suspected of involvement in terrorism. (It’s called the Fourth Amendment, Congress. Read it sometime.)

In addition to the above expiring provisions that were reauthorized, sorely needed reform to the National Security Letter statute was also kicked to the curb. Under the original Patriot Act, the government can collect the records of innocent people whenever it deems them “relevant” to an investigation – without any oversight by an impartial court.

From Raw Story:

If the Patriot Act hadn’t been approved for another year, Sunday would have looked much different.

Sunday could have meant the government was no longer given permission to wiretap the phones of Americans and seize their records and property.

But since the bill was approved by Congressional Democrats earlier this week and signed into law by President Obama on Saturday, this Sunday is just another Sunday for Americans living with the Patriot Act.

From Alternet: Patriot Act 2010: As it Was Written, So it Shall Be Done

Back in 2005, then-Senator Barack Obama had this to say opposing The Patriot Act when it came up then for reauthorization: “We do not have to settle for a Patriot Act that sacrifices our liberties or our safety. We can have one that secures both.”
Throughout his entire presidential campaign, Obama often railed against the Act, criticizing it giving authorization for the Bush administration to secretly spy on U.S. citizens, illegally and unconstitutionally and with little or no judicial or congressional oversight.

He pledged that he would institute “robust” checks and balances if he got elected, explicitly promising to overturn its unconstitutional sneak-and-peek provisions toward citizens not even suspected of a crime. “Warrantless surveillance of American citizens, in defiance of FISA, is unlawful and unconstitutional,” he said.

Guess what Obots? Obama lied and you fell for it.

Yesterday some TC’ers were watching and commenting on George Soros’ interview on CNN. Here’s a summary of Soros’ pontifications at the Wall Street Journal this morning:

Billionaire investor George Soros, who helped U.S. President Barack Obama raise money for his presidential campaign in 2008, said Sunday he wasn’t happy with Mr. Obama’s handling of the financial crisis.

Mr. Soros said the government should have taken over U.S. banks instead of bailing them out, a move he suggested would have been more popular with Americans.

“The solution that he found to the financial crisis, which was to effectively bail out the banks and allow them to earn their way out of the hole, was, in my opinion, not the right solution,” Mr. Soros said in an interview with CNN. “He should have compulsorily replaced the capital that was lost.”

But, Soros points out, it won’t stop him from making money as usual–it’s just us ordinary folks that are screwed. Ho-hum….


Ordinary folks like Richard Jones.

Chicago Sun-Times: Unemployment benefits for many expire today

Richard Jones of Brookfield spent four months in Louisiana helping communities rebuild after Hurricane Katrina. Now, he needs a little help himself, but a lone U.S. senator is blocking the way.

Jones, 29, is among the 15,000 Illinoisans whose unemployment benefits expire today because of a filibuster by U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) Bunning is using Senate rules to block a vote to fund extended benefits for people nationwide who have exhausted the basic 26 weeks of coverage.

Even with an unemployment check, it has been hard to make ends meet, said Jones, a former trucking supervisor jobless since January 2009. “All my savings is gone,” he said. “If I hurt myself, I can’t even go to the doctor.”

Jones has a bachelor’s degree in urban planning, which he put to use working with a private contractor on post-Katrina rebuilding in 2005. Nowadays, he said, he has a hard time getting callbacks despite an incessant job hunt.

But who cares, right? As long as Goldman Sachs is happy, all’s right with the world.

Meanwhile, from Raw Story, Senator John Kyl (R-Arizona) defends Senator Bunning’s FU to desperate unemployed Americans.

“All Senator Bunning was saying quite correctly is it ought to be paid for,” Sen. Jon Kyl told Fox News’ Chris Wallace.

And, Raw Story reports, Senator Bunning (often rumored to be suffering from Alzheimer’s disease) responded to critics.

Republican Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) on Thursday night expressed his opposition to renewing unemployment benefits on the Senate floor with an unusually harsh message for its backers: “Tough shit.”

It’s a nightmare. But what is being done about it? Nothing much.

At Counterpunch, Clancy Sigal wonders why liberals seem to have lost the ability to fight back in anger.

Look at the mess. Evictions – I’m a child of Great Depression furniture-thrown-on-the-street – are skyrocketing. Mortgage holders are in a feeding frenzy on their hapless fellow citizens. Michelle Obama lectures us on obesity while one in eight Americans (and one in four children) are on federal food stamps. The human toll of long term, more-or-less permanent unemployment is yet to be counted as millions of Americans are pushed out of the middle class and become the “new poor” queueing up at food banks for the first time in their lives.

Those who do vent and get angry are put down as crackpots, which they sometimes are. But the so-called left seems to have joined the mainstream (and even the radical) media in under- or mis- or never-reporting what’s actually happening in the lives of so many of us. Like Obama, Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic party establishment we’ve forfeited real gut language in favor of policy abstractions, the “issues” syndrome, that so easily hide an open wound. Joe Stack, who rammed his Piper Cherokee into the IRS building in Austin, Texas, murdering an IRS worker and injuring many, was one maladjusted injustice collector. But his online 3000-word suicide note, a long-repressed scream of protest, has the virtue of unminced words we are never likely to hear from anyone in Washington or a state capitol. “When the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die.”

Finally, I enjoyed this piece on the recent Killer Whale attack, also at Counterpunch.

Call him, just for now, Spartacus. He was two years old when the slavers captured him in 1982 and hauled him off to Oak Bay, near the town of Victoria, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, in the far Canadian west. And there he met his fellow slaves, Nootka and Haida. Day after day, in slave school they learned their tricks. Day after day, they did their act for the paying customers. And then, on February 20, 1991, in the tank operated by Sealand of the Pacific, the three struck back at their captors.

Okay, not Spartacus, but an orca whale – Tillikum, the one who drowned 40-year-old Dawn Brancheau last Wednesday in the Shamu tank, at SeaWorld, Orlando, after grabbing her by her ponytail. Tillikum was caught off Iceland. Nootka and Haida, both females, were seized in the Pacific. In fact, Nootka was the third orca by that name to be bought by Sealand. The first two died within a year of their capture. At that time, enslaved orcas had a life expectancy in captivity of anywhere from one to four years. These days they do a bit better. In wild waters, orcas live to be anywhere from 30 to 60.

Free the Killer Whales!

So what are you reading this morning?

Despite all the bad news, HAVE A MARVELOUS MONDAY!!!!!

About these ads

104 Responses

  1. Reposting from the late night thread.

    Interview with Loony Toon Tancredo (via memeorandum):

    Former Republican congressman Tom Tancredo was the opening speaker at the recent Tea Party conference with Sarah Palin. In an interview with NRC Handelsblad, he spoke his mind about Palin. “I really don’t have this feeling about her as being presidential.’’ He referred to John McCain as a “nasty, mean’’ and “peculiarly unstable’’ man. Moreover, Tancredo pointed to a possible personal embarrassment: if Tea Party activists would find out he actually voted for the bailout of the financial sector in 2008, he concedes he would loose his credibility.

    • I read that as an endorsement of McCain/Palin for sane people. If Tancredo doesn’t like them, that’s a huge plus.

      • Do the bots have some algorithm for how to react to stuff like this? “If X says that Palin is not presidential and that McCain is erratic, then embrace X, unless X is Tancredo.”

        • Probably. I’m not sure they wouldn’t embrace Tancredo. Some seem to like Coburn and he’s as far right as any.

  2. Sunday, February 28, 2010
    Goodbye
    When I began this blog, I swore to keep it up until a certain thing happened. It happened. I have to stop now.

    Many thanks to the supportive readers, especially to the ones who contributed.

    I will leave the blog up for at least a week, just in case people want to download older posts. After that, I will hit the “Delete blog” button.

    No comments will be posted. None will be read. No questions will be answered. – Joseph Cannon

    Blob News

    • oops Blog News …where is that coffee?

    • Wow, do you happen to know what that certain thing is that happened?

      • if a certain thing happened that we did not know would happen but would happen to cause happening of certain things to happen would it indeed have happened?

        • Maybe it’s the unknown unknown we didn’t know could happen but now we know that that still unknown known happens to have happened.

          Got it?

          • Maybe the FBI knocked on his door with a security letter. I actually don’t think it’s that funny myself…

          • What is a Security Letter?

          • wv, you don’t want to know. ;-)

          • I want to know, even if wv doesn’t.

            I’m going to miss Cannonfire. I couldn’t post there except very rarely and erratically because of the way his site registration works–same goes for Red Dragon’s place–but Joseph was spot-on more often than not.

          • WV: re: security letter–look at the section of the post on the Patriot act.

      • I know I’m late with this, but got to thinking about what the thing was that happened, and remembered that he’d said on more than one occasion that he’d known of blogs that were brought down due to being overwhelmed by spam messages from obots, or more likely CDers–the guys that believe collapse of the world trade center buildings was due to controlled demolition and become nasty when confronted with an opposing biew. I think that’s probably why he deleted all messages but the really nasty one–so his regular readers would know what he’d been dealing with.
        I hate it that he won’t be posting anymore but feel that he probably did the only thing he could to stop it. I just hope he’s okay.

    • It was confusing enough when he posted that last night, but since then all the comments have been deleted on that goodbye post except a really rude one.

    • I don’t know what to say. I’ve been reading Cannon since the beginning. What will I do without him? I guess I’ll download some of the best posts.

      • How old is the blog?

        • Archives begin in 2004 — so if someone wanted to archive the blog, it would take oodles of space…I think.

          I have no idea if it could even be done without his permission.

      • A National Security Letter (NSL) is a form of administrative subpoena used by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation and reportedly by other U.S. Government Agencies including the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Defense. It is a demand letter issued to a particular entity or organization to turn over various record and data pertaining to individuals. They require no probable cause or judicial oversight. They also contain a gag order, preventing the recipient of the letter from disclosing that the letter was ever issued. The gag order was ruled unconstitutional as an infringement of free speech, in the Doe v. Ashcroft case.[1]
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter

        I do recall a former CNN reporter threatening to sue him.

        I still prefer my dream for the guy…he ran off with the love of his life and he is spending time writing at the beach with his beloved dog. That is a better thought to hold and a good way to remember him.

        • If you all recall, he had started to connect some dots that seemed to point in the direction of Obama and perhaps Obama’s mother being CIA operatives. It was some spooky stuff.

      • On a day stuffed with bad news, Joseph Cannon’s abrupt departure is the worst, a big loss for all of us.

    • One of the things I remember Joe saying was that if his traffic fell below a certain point he would quit (his low point was far higher than my ninth tier high), though I don’t think that was the trigger since his traffic has looked awfully good of late.

    • I was out of town this weekend, and when I went to Mr. Cannon’s site, as I usually do first thing every morning, I was devastated to see this message. Please, if anyone knows what happened to make him stop blogging, can you let us know? If it is finances, I guess I can’t help much, but I could try to eke out a pittance each month. If it is too much commentary like the anonymous comment that he left standing (or worse), I’d volunteer to root this stuff out before he reads it, as I’m sure it wears on the soul over time. If it is a health issue, I guess I can’t do anything but wish him well. BostonBoomer, your suggestion chills me to the bone, and I hope that if nothing else, Mr. Cannon will make a statement that puts our minds at ease on that score. Despair? Boredom? PLEASE, Mr. Cannon, please say something more.

    • Very sad to see Joseph shut down his blog. It was one of the few remaining political blogs that I read. Did manage to go over and save his Christmas classic, “How the Bro’ Stole the Country”. Joseph, you will be missed. Be sure to come here and comment often.

    • I couldn’t believe it when I stopped by Cannonfire this morning. Very sad news.

      Joe, if you read this, I just want to say that I hope you are well. I’m gonna go with WV and imagine that you won the lottery and have run off to your own private island with the love of your life. Take care and I hope you come back some day in the near future. I may have strongly disagreed with you on some issues but I always enjoyed and appreciated your insight.

    • I have a spooky sense it’s a legal thing. Sounds like he’s got a week to wrap things up…then lock down. Brrrrr! Whatever it is, wtf’s the matter with that thug over at Corrente calling him a “drama queen”? Mockery is the national sport.

    • That’s really shocking.

  3. That moron flipped off both Hillary and McCain (there are many videos on YouTube of both instances). Such an immature, flat-out creepy person.

    • Yes, when he isn’t using it to send his thoughts to opponents, he’s using it to guide the one next to it up his nose.

  4. The dems can jump on Bunning as the typical republican not caring about the middle class or the struggling in this country. They should be all over this because frankly that is how the republicans are.

    As for health care it won’t mean much without a public option, just a big give away to health insurance companies while the regular folks get some crumbs.

    BTW, is there a ban on capturing orcas in the wild? It would be better to go for an international ban on capturing these animals versus setting the ones in captivity free. Remember “Free Willy” died. I have no idea how these animals may fend for themselves once freed into the wild. Some of these orcas have been born in captivity.

    • I’d rather die free than live for years as a slave. The article says they don’t last long in captivity–50 to 60 years in the wild.

      • Besides the three mentioned in the article were captured in the wild.

      • Vale mas morir a pie que vivir a rodillas–or the foot- and knee-less equivalent.

    • Reid was only looking at doing a 2 week extension for unemployment benefits in any case. That was going to screw millions. What Bunning did was just somewhat worse.

      • Reid’s bill was a patch to give them two weeks to do a longer extension. Where Reid’s at fault is in leaving this bill till the last minute. This fight, if there were going to be a fight, should have happened early last month and be over by now.

        Bunning’s insane antics have also gotten 2000 people laid off at DOT. Way to go.

        • Why did the swine need a patch? They have known this was coming for months. Can none of them play this game? Bullshit!

    • Obama’s Big Health Insurance Parasites Proft Protection Plan (BHIP-PPP):

      Health Insurance Corporations BAILOUT

      With the people mandated to buy from them. enforced by the IRS:.

      Corporate SHAKEDOWNS with Government Muscle

      And, now, Pelosi is rolling over for this mess — the Dems’ Suicide Pact.

      I really did fear Obama would destroy the Democratic Party’s brand image; I never dreamed he would succeed so quickly.

      I think he’ll be much happier with Repubs in power, so he can play out his St. Ronnie Resurrected fantasies.

      Oh, yes, I am indeed very angry, disappointed, and depressed at losing my political party to the Corporatists.

      • I saw Pelosi on TV saying that the Stupak amendment would not change anything, that no women would be any less likely to be able to get an abortion than before.
        Is she stupid or lying?

  5. Soros? I saw a recent headline where he’s made a bundle from the recent crisis – I’ll find it.
    meanwhile, from the old country traditions, it’s Happy Martisor!
    What’s that? see here
    http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/happy-march-first-martisor/

  6. Bostonboomer
    I understand you would rather die free than live as a slave. But we are talking about a highly intelligent and socially complex animal of another species. “Setting them Free” may bring about their death sooner rather than later. Placing a captive or domestically bred whale into the ocean to fend for itself is not being free..it is cruel. There is no difference is doing that than there is placing your dog or cat into the wild because it is now “free”.

    • yup, they can not learn to hunt and they die. The best idea would be to stop the breeding and capture from now on unless, just as a means of preserving the species they can be helped to breed and contained in netted in square mile sea spaces.

  7. Found the Soros article. It’s from today’s UK mail and it’s titled
    Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, ‘at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro’

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1253791/Is-man-broke-Bank-England-George-Soros-centre-hedge-funds-betting-crisis-hit-euro.html#ixzz0gwC8iWD6
    What was the definition of chutzpa?

  8. “Jones, 29, is among the 15,000 Illinoisans whose unemployment benefits expire today because of a filibuster by U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) Bunning is using Senate rules to block a vote to fund extended benefits for people nationwide who have exhausted the basic 26 weeks of coverage.”

    Could it be this is the act of a patriot?

    A few months ago I read, right here on this blog I think, about a person who compared the figures in the published budget (what is actually spent, and must be accounted for) for unemployment compensation with the published unemployment numbers using the median, I think, compensation amount. The person reported the coefficient of determination was less then one till a few years ago but now his figures showed it is over 30. The person proposed that unemployment was much greater then reported and that is why democrats will never let funding run out, and if we ever find out the true figures, there will be hell to pay.
    I hate to see people suffer, there are two unemployed in my family, and they are both staying with me temporarily, so don’t write me off as hard hearted. But something is needed to wake up the American people to the lies we are being told. I remember that post so well because I told my two, both over 50, family members to just consider their unemployment compensation as their pensions.

    Yesterday on one of those Sundays shows there was a discussion, Cooke Roberts was one of the people, as I watched them speak, where they looked when they spoke, how they tilted their heads as they spoke I got such a feeling that they were all lying and they all knew it and they all were acting their parts.

    • It is not the act of a patriot.

      It’s the act of a cruel, selfish, little, little man.

  9. Heard about this on NPR this morning driving to campus. SCOTUS has another important decision re corporate officers and racketeering

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/business/14enron.html

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal from Jeffrey K. Skilling, the former Enron Corporation chief executive who was sent to prison in 2006 for his role in the company’s spectacular collapse.

    Mr. Skilling argued that a law under which he had been convicted was unconstitutionally vague and that he had not received a fair trial in Houston, the city where Enron was based and which bore the brunt of its demise.

    The law Mr. Skilling challenged makes it a crime to “deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.”

    • So Scalia is going to bat for Jeffrey Skilling. That’ll make a nice headline. Regardless of whether the law is inadequate, why conflate it with Enron for God’s sake. Here’s the language.

      Section 1346: For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

      In Skilling’s case, SCOTUS will determine if below is permissible in the context of above. Do the terms “defraud” or “deceive” no longer have meaning for the Court.

      A corporate executive’s efforts to deceive stockholders, accountants, federal regulators and the investing public about the company’s financial condition and performance — if there is no proof that the executive obtained some private gain. (That is what former Enron Corp. CEO Jeffrey K. Skilling is arguing for in his case, Skilling v. U.S., 08-1394, just granted on Tuesday and likely to be heard in either February or March.)

      If this were a blue collar case, Skilling would not be heard by the Supreme Court. The Roberts Court has already overturned two decisions relating to Enron. If Skilling also wins, does he get a new trial, significantly reduced sentence so he walks in a few years. Is Sarbanes-Oxley next for the chopping block. He was the CEO who designed and led the fraud, not just followed direction. Relief for Skilling against backdrop of what’s happening now on Wall Street…guess we’ll all get the message.

  10. Does anyone else here find the look on O’s face the the ‘sneaky middle finger photo” to be disturbing? WTF is he thinking?

    • If you watched the entire summit (I watched most of it), he made a lot of peevish faces. Even CNN’s Candy Crowley did a montage and said he shouldn’t play poker.

  11. Daily Beast lures Hillary Clinton to help kick off its “Women in the World” summit next week.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is joining The Daily Beast’s Women in the World Stories and Solutions summit March 12, a three-day live event that also features Meryl Streep, Valerie Jarrett, Queen Rania of Jordan, and Clinton’s predecessor, Madeleine K. Albright, as well as dozens of other outstanding leaders who are on the forefront of fighting sex trafficking, child marriage, and other challenges holding back women and girls.

    • I see Mika Brzezinski on the list of leaders. She doesn’t merit an invitation.

  12. Jesse’s Café Américain:

    The parallels with the Thirties and the Teens (today) are many, and uncanny.

    There is the reformer President, elected to redress the extremely pro-business policies of his Republican predecessor. In the Thirties they had FDR who was a decisive and experienced leader. In the Teens the US has a relatively inexperienced community organizer, more influenced by the Wall Street monied interests, and a past history of ‘playing safe,’ who is trying to manage through indirection and persuasion.

  13. More from Jesse’s Café Américain:

    There are far too many otherwise responsible people who are not taking the situation with the high seriousness it deserves. Some would even like to see the US economy collapse, inflicting serious pain and deprivation because it may:

    1.suit their investment positions and feed their egos because they think themselves above it all,
    2. satisfy their ideological and emotional needs to see punishment administered, almost always to others, for the excesses of the credit bubble, especially if they are relatively weak, unwitting victims, and
    3. the sheer nastiness and immaturity of a portion of the population which wallows in stereotypes, childish behaviour, and disappointment with their own lives. They tend to find and follow demagogues that feed their bitter hatreds.

    They know not what they do, until they do it, and see the results. It is often a good bet to assume that people will be irrational, almost to the point of idiocy and self-destruction. And some of them never wake up until they are overrun, and then will not admit their error out of a stubborn sense of pride and embarrassment.

  14. During his campaign, Mr Obama electrified Americans by promising bold action to suit turbulent times. “Did John Kennedy look at the moon and say: ‘That looks kind of far away. Let’s be realistic’?” Mr Obama said on the hustings.

    As president, Mr Obama has argued that joblessness and idle capacity are a blight on America’s future. But he has not yet found the ideas, or the political will, to propose any remedies. It is as though he is prescribing aspirin having diagnosed cancer.

    Mr Obama’s respectable but marginal proposals to kick-start job creation and investment are unlikely to do much to reverse the collapse in America’s heartlands or set the stage for the next phase of US growth. Unless and until he can come up with something better, the moon will continue to look very far away.

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0b9d6902-2310-11df-a25f-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1

  15. Yeah, that Cannonfire post really shook me up. He’s one of my favorite bloggers (was, I guess) and I wonder what the heck is up. As lambert noted, Cannon was a big debunker of conspiracy theories and this departure sounds like a huge conspiracy theory on its own…have no idea what happened here but it worries me.

    • I think if it was anything more serious than a personal limit he imposed, the site would have simply disappeared without a week to allow downloading.

  16. Found this limerick about Obama and the Summit yesterday over at Mad Kane’s Political Madness blog:

    Dear Obama, Enough With The Voltaire!

    I don’t know about you, but I’m getting really tired of this line frequently used by Obama and other pols: “America can’t afford to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

    Obama usually uses this Voltaire paraphrase as an excuse to disappoint progressives yet again.

    The original Voltaire quote is “The perfect is the enemy of the good,” translated from the French, “Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien.” (The literal translation actually should be, “The best is the enemy of the good.”)

    This brings me to my latest double limerick:

    Dear Obama, Enough With The Voltaire!
    By Madeleine Begun Kane

    There once was a guy named Voltaire,
    A Frenchman whose wisdom pols share.
    They say, “Perfect, though fine,
    Is hardly divine
    When it blocks the essential. So there!”

    Dear Obama, this line is just guff —
    An excuse for not doing enough
    .
    So instead of excuses,
    Fight right-wing abuses.
    Voltaire is annoying. Hang tough!

    Lots more at her site. (My emphasis above)

  17. ABC’s The Note:

    James Carville, on “GMA,” asked if he’s as confident as Pelosi that the House will have the votes: “No — but I’m glad to hear that she’s confident…. We’re going to see how effective our leaders are. We’re going to see how effective the White House can be… But if this doesn’t get done, it will hurt the Democratic Party — there’s no doubt about that.”

    Politico:

    Health care: Pelosi and other top House Democrats say publicly that they have the votes to push through a comprehensive package, but privately, they know they don’t. Pelosi must balance the diverging interests of her own members while simultaneously satisfying Senate Democrats and working with President Barack Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, a former House colleague with whom she has an uneasy relationship.

    The voters: The electoral winds that were at Pelosi’s back in the past two cycles thanks to having George W. Bush in the White House are blowing this year in Democrats’ faces. Prognosticators both inside and outside the party are laying odds on an outcome that seemed unthinkable just a few months ago: a GOP takeover of the House.

    [...]

    Pelosi, who can be as loyal as they come if you’re her friend, can also be ruthless as a political enemy — especially if someone threatens her party’s majority.

    Pelosi “will put a bullet in the head of anyone she needs to,” said a Democratic insider. “Rangel, any incumbent that looks like he’s going to lose. She’ll do anything it takes to keep her majority, anything.”

    While Democrats are concerned about their poll numbers, interviews with a broad swath of Democratic members reveal little sense of panic — and some confidence that Pelosi and the party will navigate a choppy stretch ahead and retain their majority in November.

    “Pressure always comes with that job,” said Rep. Mike Capuano (D-Mass.), a Pelosi ally. “There are many of us who think she takes on too much on her own, because we don’t want her to burn out. I’m one of the hardest-working people I know, and she makes me look like a laggard. I tell you, I think she’ll be fine.”

    New kinda politics. Transformative. Sounds like a real progressive realignment is afoot.

    • And taking time away from a serious and committed strategy for JOBS. They can’t focus.

  18. Anderson Cooper Said to Meet With CBS News Executives.

    CBS executives, mindful that Katie Couric’s contract expires in a little over a year, have talked to Anderson Cooper of CNN about an anchor job, according to two TV veterans informed of the meeting.

    (snip)

    ..a longtime network news executive, who asked not to be identified because of connections to previous private negotiations involving CNN, said that ABC or CBS was likely to enter into an alliance with a partner like CNN within the next few years.

    • Another barrier broken? But I suppose there have been gay news anchors before.

      • I’m a bit sorry for Katie, if she’s really going. She broke a barrier. She also helped make Jeff Zucker when she was at NBC, though I’ll be happy to see him go. Good for Anderson if he gets the gig – needs to get past the CNN cheerleading of Obama and stick to real news.

      • he’s not really out or is he? I’ve never seen him say so…

        • he is not but everybody knows anyway

        • I know him. He’s not exactly in the closet because he’s always surrounded by an entourage of very out young men. He just doesn’t talk about it. He’s not an activist but he doesn’t hide it, so I’m never quite sure exactly how many toes are still in and how many are out of the closet. But, believe me, when he’s down here, you know he’s gay and he talks about his dog alot as well as his live in companion or he did the last time I talked to him.

          • Which is exactly as it should be. Why should any person be expected to declare their sexual preferences to anyone other than the person they wish to be sexual with?

            Our society is so darned busy labeling people, they restrict the richness of their own lives. Heaven forbid that I were to decide any person with differences from me would need to stay away from my life…what a dreary world I’d be in.

  19. Krugman:

    That said, some Republicans might, just possibly, be persuaded to sign on to a much-weakened version of reform — in particular, one that eliminates a key plank of the Obama administration’s proposals, the creation of a strong, independent agency protecting consumers. Should Democrats accept such a watered-down reform?

    I say no.

    There are times when even a highly imperfect reform is much better than nothing; this is very much the case for health care. But financial reform is different. An imperfect health care bill can be revised in the light of experience, and if Democrats pass the current plan there will be steady pressure to make it better. A weak financial reform, by contrast, wouldn’t be tested until the next big crisis. All it would do is create a false sense of security and a fig leaf for politicians opposed to any serious action — then fail in the clinch.

    • If Paul wants real financial reform, he should call for Congress and the Aministration to give more power to Elizabeth Warren. Instead her power’s been undercut, the Consumer Protection Agency is being scrapped. But Paul rarely mentions Warren…maybe it’s professional competition. He’s a Nobel Prize winner with a part time job at a newspaper. He probably wouldn’t mind a higher profile job in the Administration.

    • James Kwak of Baseline Scenario has a write up about the article. He pretty much shares Krugman’s sentiment:

      Krugman: No Bill Is Better Than a Weak Bill

      I’m with Krugman. There are certainly things that would probably make it into a compromise bill that are better than nothing. Resolution authority would be better than nothing, although far from a perfect solution. Systemic risk regulation would be better than nothing — though perhaps not much better, depending on who is in charge of it. But frankly without the CFPA and without a real solution to banks that are too big to fail, it seems to me we will have avoided solving the biggest problems.

      If we want change, someone has to be willing to stand up for it. If you want to win a negotiation, you have to be willing to walk away. If you can’t do that, you will get rolled on every issue. The Democrats need to force the Republicans to make a public choice on the CFPA, instead of negotiating against themselves and taking the issue off the table. Voters will be upset if Congress does nothing about the financial system, but the Democrats should have the courage to point out why they couldn’t pass anything. Taking a stand on consumer protection should not be that hard a position to take.

    • Why he difference, Paul? HCR is “imperfect” by making things worse, just like the financial reform. Why would we trust anyone to improve anything at this point? Krugman has lost any semblance of logic or consistency.

    • Not a big fan of Warren these days, but he’s kind of right. Healthcare reform was always first and foremost about reducing costs because the future trajectory looks scary. But Congress and the Admin continue to package and sell the bill politically as a net win for everybody. Only a few like Kucinich speak about it honestly. Better to start over and begin disassembling the private insurance industry in stages.

    • Just saw this in the Times. Clearly meant to pressure legislators but probably not inaccurate. The Cost of Doing Nothing on Health Care

      Far from it, health policy analysts and economists of nearly every ideological persuasion agree. The unrelenting rise in medical costs is likely to wreak havoc within the system and beyond it, and pretty much everyone will be affected, directly or indirectly.

      • Actually there are a bunch of top health-care economists of all stripes who signed a letter urgent Congress to pass the bill, although it’s far from their ideal.

        As for “starting the legislation over”, I’m always reminded of UHC 1994:

        GOP Presses for Delay in Health Reform Action

        Republicans say they are reacting not only to polling data but to what they view as Clinton’s intransigence. They complain that Clinton has refused to agree to significant compromises on such issues as requiring all employers to pay for their workers’ coverage, even though he seems unable to win over enough members of his own party in Congress to pass the sort of legislation he favors.

        And then there was this:

        Cheney, at a news conference following his talk, said that based on his travels around the country campaigning for GOP candidates, he has concluded that the “vast majority of the American people are going to be suspicious of something that’s passed in the dark of night and rushed out to the floor in a big cardboard box that nobody has had the chance to analyze or examine.”

        Virginia GOP Chairman Patrick McSweeney, one of the Southern leaders who voted for the resolution urging postponement of congressional action, said the proposal was intended to influence GOP lawmakers, particularly Dole, who is the author of the principal GOP approach to health care.

        In his remarks, Dole touted his own reform proposal, which offers fewer benefits at lower cost than Democratic-backed alternatives. But he also sounded willing to consider waiting until next year.

        “We don’t have to do it all this year,” he said in the closing address to committee members. “We don’t have to do any of it this year. You know, Congress meets every year.

        This is really deja vu all over again, only with the President not really fighting for a “Democratic” bill.

        • I suspect none of these “top economists” are on the individual market, where there is NO cost control from this bill.

          The bill should be scrapped.

          • Of course there is, but not as well as we would like it. Still better that the current path.

            none of these “top economists” are on the individual market

            : That does that mean?

          • Probably means you’re still selling a POS plan you will not have to use.

            What cost control is in the bill? Please point it out.

          • There is no meaningful cost control in the senate bill. You think mandates will provide cost controls? Have you ever looked at Enron. Trusting insurance companies to lower rates because more “healthy” people are in the system is a freaking laugher. Corporations do not do the right thing. They do the money-making thing.

            So mandates are the main cost control that people-who-won’t-be-affected-by-the bill often taut (I’m sure that includes you). What other cost controls could there be.

            If you ask either Warren Buffet or ME, there are NO cost controls.

        • Maybe the difference now is that 80 million boomers will begin retiring this year for the next 18 years. Regardless of solution, the steep trajectory of aggregate cost of care is the same. The challenge is managing the cost to the individual while providing universal coverage, supporting providers and essential healthcare services, and keeping the government solvent. Single payer would seem inevitable.

    • This is Marc Thiessen from the right on the politics of the healthcare legislation.

      Death panels are back. No, they are not part of the health-care legislation President Obama is proposing. But if Democratic leaders try to ram through an unpopular health-care bill along strict party lines, as they seem poised to do, they could condemn many congressional careers — and quite possibly their majority — in this year’s midterm elections. That would be bad for Democrats in Congress — but good for President Obama.

      The legislation Obama is pursuing faces deep-seated public opposition. A CNN poll last week found that only 25 percent of Americans want Congress to pass a health-care bill similar to the one it has been working on for the past year, while 73 percent say Congress should either start from scratch or not pass health-care legislation at all (other polls show support for the bill in the low 40s). A Gallup poll last week found that 52 percent of Americans oppose using “reconciliation” to overcome Republican opposition and push the bill through with Democratic votes.

      Bottom line: Americans don’t trust this Congress on health care, they don’t like the Democrats’ bill, and don’t agree with the partisan legislative strategy the Democrats are pursuing.

      • Though in the end, it’s a Republican lite bill. Maybe it’ll be Repubs in the House and Senate who will help Nancy and Harry pass it.

        • Sssst! Don’t tell that to anyone! GOP is on the record as opposing it, they’ll make hey of that when people realize what those mandates are.

  20. I don’t know why they are acting like getting single payer through is so hard. All you need to do is.

    Step one: order the justice department to do a thorough investigation of the insurance industry.

    Step two: get convictions throughout the country and encourage civil suites with heavy fines.

    Step three: spread rumors around washington that the insurance industry executives were turning in the politicians they had bribed to save themselves.

    Step four: Hint that the politicians who vote for single payer wont be

    investigated as hard.

    Of course this would require a completely different president, but so does every other solution I can think of.

  21. scrap this crap start over from scratch..

  22. Obama’s Drop

    http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/03/obamas-drop.html

    Barack Obama now has a negative approval rating in every state he flipped from the Bush column to his in 2008. In each of those places his level of support is now in the 44-46% range. It’s probably a good thing he doesn’t have to run for reelection this year. He can only hope things start turning around for him once the midterms are in the rear view mirror, much as they did for Bill Clinton.

  23. RalphB,
    I’m not selling any bill. I’m grappling with the fact that “starting over” is just the same type of sabotage I heard in 1994.
    I don’t know everything that’s in the bill and neither do you. I just look for a rational way to consider what is in front of us.
    I get my clues from all the people I’ve been reading on healthcare matters starting in 1994, whether they are for the bill or against it.

    I’m not a health-care economist but there are a lot of scholars among the signers I have an enormous amount of respect for.

    Health Economists Urge Passage of Reform

    The signers include Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel laureate and behavioral economist; David Cutler and Len Nichols, who have advised Congress on health policy over the last year; Theda Skocpol, the political scientist; Henry Aaron of the Brookings Institution; and Paul Starr, author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning history of medical care.

    • mablue, I realize you aren’t selling the thing but I just don’t buy into the theories of the “health care economists”. That is particularly true of Aaron, Cutler, and Paul Krugman’s colleague at Princeton Uwe Reinhardt. If they were correct, we would be OK now since in the ’90s they pushed the HMO Managed Care solution which worked so poorly as the only true answer. Even though that had lousy outcomes, they have not changed their stripes. Whether they are corrupt or just wedded to their theories I neither know nor care, I believe they are wrong.

      With the boomers retiring, the only change I see being really viable is single payer, specifically Medicare for All with a Private Option. The doctors at PNHP are the authority I look to for guidance.

      I simply do not buy that “starting over” with single payer on the table is the equal to the mess in ’94. If anything I think it’s the only chance we have of achieving the full blown reform we need. Once Congress passes something, we are done for a very long time. If it’s not viable, we’re well and truly screwed. Starting over gives us a chance to do it right. It may not be much of a chance but it’s probably the only one we have left.

  24. SPAMMY!!!

    LEMME OUT THIS INSTANT!!!

  25. Here’s a good visualization of the 800 billion stimulus, where and how much has been spent.

  26. I have stills from when he gave Hillary the finger.

    Carolyn Kay
    MakeThemAccountable.com

    • The video clip you have of him doing the same to McCain was one I hadn’t seen before. However, I DID see a more obvious time when he certainly did give McCain the cheek scratch with that nasty smirk he used on the Hillary flip off.

      This is a regular gesture for him. It’s these types of things he does that make me not like him. I could be unhappy that he is our inexperienced POTUS during these stressful times without disliking him, but he makes that impossible with his immature behavior.

  27. Dear Mr. Cannon,

    Now who’s going to explain to me what’s going on?

    I really hope you’re OK and that things go well for you. I join many others in my desolation at your departure.

    Best of luck in everything, my friend. Come back soon if you possibly can.

  28. In the current state of economy, selecting a medical insurance plan that has great coverage and is affordable can be a difficult task. Still, health is our most valuable asset and it is very important to protect it as much as possible.
    Thus it is essential to truly understand the importance of global medical insurance and who to go about finding it.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 362 other followers

%d bloggers like this: