• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    RD on Moving related program ac…
    Hamfast Ruddyneck on Moving related program ac…
    Hamfast Ruddyneck on Moving related program ac…
    SWPAnnA on Moving related program ac…
    SWPAnnA on Moving related program ac…
    roofingbird on Moving related program ac…
    riverdaughter on Moving related program ac…
    CB on 5 and a half minutes of a…
    roofingbird on Moving related program ac…
    roofingbird on Moving related program ac…
    Sweet Sue on Moving related program ac…
    riverdaughter on Moving related program ac…
    roofingbird on Moving related program ac…
    Teresa on “largely an insult to th…
    katiebird on Moving related program ac…
  • Categories


  • Tags

  • Archives

  • History

    February 2010
    S M T W T F S
    « Jan   Mar »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28  
  • RSS Paul Krugman: Conscience of a Liberal

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • Ah yes
      The secret donors behind liberal think tanks. Bookmark It
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Top Posts

Monday Morning News and Views

Good Morning Conflucians! And congratulations to the New Orleans Saints, their fans, and the City of New Orleans! The Saints are the winners of Super Bowl XLIV!

From the New Orleans Times-Picayune: The New Orleans Saints win the Super Bowl

They beat the Indianapolis Colts 31-17 here at Sun Life Stadium in South Florida.

Saints quarterback Drew Brees was 32-of-39 for 288 yards and two touchdowns.

But it was the big 75-yard interception return for a touchdown by cornerback Tracy Porter that sealed the deal.

“I studied and knew their tendencies,” Porter said. “I just jumped around and the ball went right into my hands.”

Porter grew up in Louisiana and graduated from Indiana University. Too bad the Colts didn’t grab him.

“I have been watching him since my time in Indiana,” Porter said of Manning. “I watched him put up points on the scoreboard. To come back home to Louisiana and bring a trophy back home, nothing is better.”

Porter, in his second season, is as responsible for the Saints’ Super Bowl triumph as any other Saint. He was one of the Saints’ heroes in the NFC Championship Game, when he intercepted a Brett Favre pass across the middle with 19 seconds left in regulation to stop the Vikings with the score tied at 28 before the Saints won in overtime on a field goal.

Yesterday, Porter intercepted one of the smartest quarterbacks in the history of the game. And he did it by studying just as hard as Manning does before games.

Maybe Dakinikat can tell us what the celebration was like on the ground in New Orleans.

New Orleans also elected a new mayor over the weekend.

NEW ORLEANS — In an event-packed weekend here that included the New Orleans Saints’ first-ever trip to the Super Bowl and seven Mardi Gras parades, Mitch Landrieu, the state’s lieutenant governor and scion of a well-known Louisiana political family, captured enough attention to become the city’s 61st mayor.
Landrieu received 66% of votes at the polls Saturday, avoiding a runoff. His landslide victory over 10 opponents brings to a close the tumultuous eight years of Ray Nagin, who has been the public face of New Orleans since the floods following Hurricane Katrina devastated the city in 2005. Nagin had served the maximum number of terms allowed by law.

In more sobering news, at least for us in New England, a massive explosion at the Kleen Energy power plant in Middletown, Connecticut (a suburb of Hartford) destroyed the largest building at a giant power plant, which would have been the largest in the region. Five workers are confirmed dead, and twelve are known to be injured, but officials are not yet releasing names.

Workers were running tests yesterday in anticipation of the gas powered plant going on-line soon. No one knows for sure yet what caused the explosion except that a gas line somehow ignited. At a news conference yesterday, Middletown Mayor Sebastian N. Giuliano said that up to 300 workers could have been at the plant, but probably only around 50 were in or near the building that exploded and then burned intensely for about an hour before firefighters could put out the blaze. This morning Governor M. Jodi Rell said that there were probably 100 people at the plant yesterday and most are accounted for. It’s hard to know what to believe, because news accounts are still very vague. The only thing I know for sure is that some workers are still missing.

Hartford Courant: Middletown Power Plant Explosion: Workers Unaccounted For, Search Called Off

MIDDLETOWN — – UPDATE (7:18 a.m.): Crews are returning to the Kleen Energy plant this morning to determine when rescuers can resume their search through the rubble for workers who remain unaccounted for.

The search was suspended at about 2:30 a.m. because the debris is unstable, said Middletown Deputy Fire Marshal Al Santostefano.

Lights were brought in and dogs were assisting rescuers, he said. But all were called out when it was determined that the rubble may be dangerous.

He said experts will determine when, and under what circumstances, the search can resume.

Middletown Power Plant Was To Be Among Biggest In Region

The Kleen Energy Systems power plant that was rocked by a deadly explosion Sunday sits on a moonscape of rock and cliff at a former feldspar mine overlooking the Connecticut River.

Proposed in 2001, and funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from one of the largest private energy investment firms in the country, the plant was to be among the biggest new electricity projects in New England, costing nearly $1 billion.

Construction workers had to move 1.6 million yards of rock and earth to claw out a 137-acre site for the plant on land owned by Middletown trash czar Phil Armetta. Armetta is a former partner in the project who withdrew after he was convicted in a federal crackdown on the trash industry.

William Corvo, a former Middletown councilman who is a principal partner in the project, said from the chaotic scene Sunday that the plant was 96 percent complete.

Just about a year ago, there was another power plant explosion in Connecticut–at the Yale’s Central Power Plant:

…Connecticut was suffering through some of the chilliest weather in recent memory, with overnight lows reaching into the single digits. As part of an agreement with Southern Connecticut Gas, the power plant — which runs on natural gas — switches to backup fuel to relieve the strain on SCG’s gas network when it is at high capacity, such as in the case of especially cold temperatures.

As a result, the plant switched off its natural gas lines two weeks ago and began powering its three massive turbines using reserves of diesel fuel held in tanks at the plant, according to power plant officials.

Then something went wrong. At about 2:15 a.m., a violent explosion ripped through the second of the plant’s three turbines, apparently the result of a fuel leak. The explosion was so intense that it blew out several of the doors on the turbine’s metal enclosure, witnesses said.

If any workers had been in the vicinity at the time, they likely would have been seriously injured, if not worse, Starr said.

Luckily no one was hurt in that explosion, but it has to make you wonder about these natural gas plants.

Interestingly, the Kleen Energy plant that exploded yesterday was “underwritten by Goldman Sachs” and was named the “The Deal of the Year” in 2008 by ProjectFinance magazine. The deal was for a “fixed price certain contract,” meaning that, according to this seemingly knowledgeable dailykos commenter, if the focus of investors was on short-term profits, shortcuts could have been taken in order to stay within the fixed cost estimate.

See, here’s the thing I’ve seen in the world of contracts: the people who run a rather large percentage of these companies look only at the short-term profits from the deal, and not the long-term structural needs of the underlying project. They make a bid based on a bunch of BS markups on the fungible labor costs, with a token amount tossed in to make it look like the underlying item will be tested and maintained, usually based on a near-best-case scenario, then outsource as much of the labor as possible to the lowest bidding sub-contractor, pocketing the remainder as profits.

In other news:

President Obama is asking Republicans to join him in another “summit meeting” about health care.

President Barack Obama, seeking to give new momentum to his languishing health-care legislation, said he would sit down with Republican and Democratic lawmakers to exchange ideas on an issue that has deeply divided the parties.

With the GOP united against the Democratic bill, Mr. Obama said Sunday he would ask Republicans “to put their ideas on the table.” The half-day meeting will be Feb. 25 and broadcast live, the White House said.

“I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through systematically all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward,” the president told CBS in an interview broadcast Sunday.

{Sigh…} This obsession Obama has with bipartisan agreement on everything is starting to look like it could be a sign of a serious psychological disorder. What is his problem? Democrats are asking him to take a leadership role and just say straight out what he wants, but he simply refuses to do that–or maybe he just doesn’t know what he wants.

President Barack Obama has left Democrats as confused as ever about how the White House plans to deliver a health care reform bill this year, after two weeks of inconsistent statements, negligible hands-on involvement and a sudden shift to a jobs-first message.

Democrats on Capitol Hill and beyond say they have no clear understanding of the White House strategy — or even whether there is one — and are growing impatient with Obama’s reluctance to guide them toward a legislative solution.

At a White House meeting Thursday with Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expressed frustration with the slow pace of the negotiations and the president’s decision not to weigh in publicly on a path forward, according to a Democratic source familiar with the meeting.

And some Democrats feel that every time they look to White House for clarity, they hear something different, as though the strategy is whatever the president or his top advisers said that day.

Gee, what a surprise. But no one could have seen this coming, right? Except a few bitter knitters like us.

Obama is also trying to pretend that things are getting better because the unemployment rate dropped in January–even though total jobs lost increased.

The trouble with understanding the U.S. labor situation is that these two key economic indicators are compiled using multiple sources. “Total jobs lost” comes from surveys of businesses that pay payroll taxes and are required to report their monthly personnel gains and losses. The unemployment rate, by contrast, comes from door-to-door surveys of American households where people self-report their employment situation. On average, about 50,000 households are surveyed a month.

Both are imprecise measures, and as evidenced today, jobs lost numbers are frequently revised as new data comes in.

Many experts dismissed the improving numbers as statistical illusions. “There was an inexplicable decline in unemployment in January,” said economist Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute, a non-profit Washington-based think tank. While the lower unemployment number is a welcome sign, the drop is “largely attributed to the higher volatility of the … household survey,” she said.

Marc Lieberman dismissed the improved unemployment rate outright. “In a situation like we have now, where the job market actually worsened, the unemployment rate is going down because people are giving up looking for work.” Lieberman, Clinical Professor of Economics at NYU, and an expert in labor economics, also noted that the number of people who want a job, but have not looked in the last 12 months, is rising, a fact unaccounted for in the unemployment numbers.

And from Politico: Jobs Bill Gets Snowed Under

Senate Democrats will miss their self-imposed deadline for bringing a jobs bill to the floor Monday, and they’re hoping that the weekend’s epic snowstorm will give them some cover.

Senate votes scheduled for Monday evening have been pushed back to Tuesday on account of the storm, but it seems unlikely that Democrats would have been ready to proceed Monday, anyway.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last week that he believed “very emphatically” that the Senate would hold a vote on the first of a series of jobs bills Monday.

But there was no agreement on a bill late Sunday afternoon, and aides to senators involved in the discussions cautioned against expecting much progress by Monday.

That’s it for me. What are you reading this morning?

HAVE A MARVELOUS MONDAY!!!!

I’m just posting this because I really like it. I love trains, and I’ve always wanted to take the train to New Orleans. Willie’s version first and then Arlo’s

About these ads

193 Responses

  1. Here’s a story that is so repulsive that I couldn’t bring myself to include it in the post: Is John Edwards Done Forever?

    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/201002u/john-edwards-poll

    • OMG–that last comment was disgusting.

    • I saw a post about that article and decided it was better for my health not to read it. He “better wait for Elizabeth to die, and then exploit the sympathy of a single dad.” Just when you think we can’t sink any lower in our political life.

      BTW: Eliot Spitzer is also actively plotting his return to politics. He took his dutiful few months off, and is now pushing hard for reentry, because he “wants to remain relevant.” What is the matter with these egomaniacs–they can’t find any other way to “be relevant” than to promote themselves in a high profile position? Start a damn foundation and do some charitable work!

      • Unbelieveable. But these days, maybe it isn’t.

      • I would love to have Spitzer back as, say, Secretary of the Treasury or some other position where he’s involved with policing the financial industry. He knows the territory like the back of his hand, and he’s on the right side. That’s very rare and very needed right now.

        It’s one thing for Edwards to go down–he was a poseur and didn’t have much to offer. But Spitzer, like Bill Clinton, is a politician of substance. I deplore what he did, but his capacity for contributing to the greater good is so high that I’m willing to let it go.

        • Agree re Spitzer. Real substance. I still think the bankers were out to take him down , reporting the payment checks. Tin-foil, maybe, but they wanted him gone.

          Edwards? Good riddance. Just go away.

    • Outlast Your Ex: One prominent PR consultant voiced what others were too polite to say (but only, of course, on the condition of anonymity): John Edwards will have a hard time venturing back into the public eye as long as his wife is present to remind Americans of the scope of his betrayal. “I honestly don’t believe he can make a true comeback until well after Elizabeth has passed away,” the consultant said. “As long as she is alive, his comeback chances are dead.”

      HOW SICK! I often pray for Elizabeth and pray that she is given more time to spend with her children and her family that truly love her. John Edwards, needs to go live with his HUNTER and leave Elizabeth and the American people alone and let her live in PEACE. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH LIES and some things just aren’t fixable. He made his bed and porn film and he can at least be honest about who he is…now that we know about the film and the photos and what little regard he had for his wife, family and for this nation!

      • That was the last comment that horrified me.

        • It’s as if a massive number of Americans (especially in the media) have lost all semblance of morality.

          • We’ve become an incredibly callous nation. I think the devolution of news reporting to infotainment with its tendency to push the envelope further and further toward–past, actually–the worst sort of tabloid “reporting” has a lot to do with it. There’s a point at which the competition for shock becomes the competition for schlock.

    • Atrocious.

    • Well, these are PR sharks talking here, and they were not asked a moral question. The last comment, however appalling, has a basis in reality–Charles and Diana.

  2. He never really cared about health care–he cared about Being President. Now they are surprised he has no fight in his belly for the issue?

    White House announces televised health meet

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32646.html

    • I’m not buying the bipartisan stuff for a minute.
      It’s a tactic, and has nothing to do with the health care legislation.

      The campaign folks want Obama to have another televised opportunity to beat up Republicans.
      It’s about Obama (always) and approval ratings and mid-term elections.

    • Will there be a press meeting to say what is OFF THE TABLE OF DISCUSSIONS and what private concessions have already been made?

    • I agree with bb. It’s a psychological disorder. It’s as if Obama fears being disliked so intensely that the only place he’s comfortable is sitting firmly on the fence. The man is truly immobilized by indecision. He is the antithesis of a leader.

      • Thanks, gxm17. I’m glad I’m not alone in this. I seriously think there is something wrong with this guy. And as usual in DC, it will be covered up. Meanwhile we literally no leadership, because the Dems in Congress are sitting around waiting for Obama to lead. Soon we’ll have Republican leadership, and we already know where that will take us.

        • I actually feel bad for the guy because I think that he probably has abandonment issues. I mean his dad took a hike. His mom left his grandma to raise him. I still think that couldn’t be easy on a child. He definitely imo seems to have some issues with wanting those that snub him to like him straght down from his extremely odd praise of his absent father(as opposed to his grandmother who actually did raise him) to the Republican coalition(who calls him socialist at every turn).

        • I think Obama’s problem is that he thinks all these “issues” talk are for the hoi polloi. “Bipartisan” is about him being this magical consensus builder to tone down the “noise” of the riff raff and make everything wonderful. I really don’t think he has any great vision. He wanted to be president and thinks he’s done us a big favor by doing so.

        • I thought there was something wrong with him even during the primary – some personality disorder. At times I felt that he might go right over the edge.

          cwaltz – I also feel sorry for him in the sense that I feel sorry for anyone who is screwed up because they cannot be very happy. And, I agree that he probably has abandonment issues. That, to me, is what sticks out about his ‘magical’ life story.

        • Aggressive narcissism

          1. Glibness/superficial charm
          2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
          3. Pathological lying
          4. Cunning/manipulative
          5. Lack of remorse or guilt
          6. Emotionally shallow
          7. Callous/lack of empathy
          8. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

          We know very little about his life before he came to Chicago. Very few people have come forward and said “I knew him when”. There is a man in HI, who was a character in Obama’s first book. Another man who worked with Obama in NY and the woman who followed Obama as editor of the Law Review.

          • Remember that person that had the college pics of Obama… she waited to go public with them until after he was elected? He is very protected.

          • Frank Marshall Davis…is that the man in HI who was only referred to by his first name in Obama’s novel?

            Obama’s grandfather introduced him to Frank because he felt Barack needed to know a black person. Frank took him under his wing and mentored him.

          • I posted over at TGW that I think ADD is part of his makeup. He flits from crisis to crisis without handling anything. He has bursts of hostility with increased demands for playtime. It’s the ritalin-presidency.

          • I actually know somebody who “knew him when,” from the Harvard Law Review. Oddly, she has never said ANYTHING of substance about him (notwithstanding the fact that she has been very politically active on his behalf) other than “we all knew he was destined for greatness” kind of stuff. It’s very strange.

          • Um, to clarify — *I* don’t know my acquaintance from HLS! (My life would be very very different, that’s for sure.) She went to HLS and I know her from law practice elsewhere…

        • But BB we spotted that some time ago – you’re not alone my friend.

        • Frank Marshall Davis…is that the man in HI who was only referred to by his first name in Obama’s novel?
          *********
          No… it was an Asian-American man who, in Obama’s book, was conflicted about his racial identity, blah..blah. He said that he was never conflicted and that Obama had basically “reversed roles” and projected all of his conflicts onto him.

          Of all of the States, Hi is probably the least “conflicting” environment for non-white, mixed-race, etc people. Haoles,” Caucasians” are not at the top of the social pecking order in HI.

        • Add me to that list. Be wrong or be right but for god’s sake BE.

  3. Received this email from the DSCC this morning:

    ________________________________
    Dear Catarina,

    Did you read about last weekend’s “tea party” convention in Nashville? Attendees paid $549 apiece for a weekend of activism and education capped by the main attraction: a speech by everybody’s favorite half-term former Alaska governor, Sarah Palin. For her efforts, Palin received more than $100,000 in speaking fees – and the adoration of legions of fans.

    In honor of the tea party convention, we came up with a way for you to tell us what you think she’s saying. Just click on the link below, fill in the speech bubble, then submit it to us. We’ll post the best creations at dscc.org.

    Be creative! Sarah Palin wants to be the voice of the tea party movement. Let’s help.

    -DSCC
    _____________________________________________

    When they’re not begging for money, this is what the DSCC is doing?
    Seriously??

    • This isn’t going to help them with anyone but their tiny and shrinking base of true-believers.

    • OMG, what a bunch of idiots.

    • These people have nothing to offer but hate. I noticed that the Cheeto and DU are gleefully referring to the appearance as “Palin’s hand job.”

      The Dems are going to drive more and more people away from their party in sheer disgust. Even those who might have sympathy with their (supposed) policies are going to be too revulsed by who these people are to want anything to do with them.

      They are fast forming the public impression that a vote for any Democrat is a vote for allying yourself with a puerile, adolescent, hateful, misogynist, spoiled, condescending pack of out-of-control little nasty frat boys and their snickering cheerleader squad.

      It’s reaching the point where voters are going to say to the Democrats, “Fuck policy – I just DON’T LIKE YOU.”

      • Believe it or not, there was a recommended diary at the Cheeto this morning that said Palin using notes on her hand was no big deal. There isn’t all that much Obama love over there anymore. I actually commented on that diary on the Middletown, CT disaster.

        • Before long, I’ll be a “trusted user” again.

          • Yeah but why would it matter since the other people who are “trusted users” were allowed to lie, slant, or propagandize.

            The site itself lost credibility when it decided it was okay to make stuff up and post it as a diary as long as it served the greater purpose of electing Obama.

          • I was kidding, actually. I wouldn’t comment on anything except something I really cared about like this disaster in New England.

          • “trusted user” — would that be user of hopium?

        • They had better wise up fast. I was thinking on an interesting analogy this week. I am in need of a new car. So we went and looked at several models both used and new at various dealers here in town.

          There was one in particular that was wonderful – fuel efficient, room for the big dogs, well-priced, etc. We walked off the lot in about 2 minutes, and I commented that I would never EVER buy that model from that dealer, no matter how nice it was. Why? Because the dealership was sleazy. The salesmen were unctious and pushy and dripping weasel words. In short, the whole place just made my skin crawl.

          This is the scenario the Dems are creating in the electorate. “I do not care what a good deal you are offering, I can’t bring myself to do business with you.”

        • I am seriously fed up with these cheeseball juvenile Progressives. They are irredeemable in my mind. They do not live in the real wrold.

      • Seems like the Alaskan “progressives” have another take on Palin. It just shows how much they hate women. I won’t even post the title here. Just the link. Be prepared.

        http://tinyurl.com/yhmp7cl

        • Are those the same Alaskan “progressives” that filed all those frivolous lawsuits, all of which got thrown out of court, but cost the Palin family $500,000 in legal fees, resulting in her resignation?

          No thanks.

    • How did you resist the urge to fill in the bubble with something that spoke to the Senate Democratic agenda?

      I’d be tempted to have my thought bubble say “It doesn’t matter if you elect me or the Democrats because either way you are going to get corporate sponsored, anti choice death panels so I can say anything and it doesn’t matter” thought bubble.

    • They come off like a pack of juvenile hyenas. Which is probably pretty accurate.

  4. NT Time has this article, In a Message to Democrats, Wall St. Sends Cash to G.O.P. which struck me as not surprising but rather blatant. Don’t they care how many of us see this plutocracy/oligarchy for what it is? Aren’t they at least concerned with keeping up appearances?!

    • No one can touch them. No one is even trying. Wall Street will listen to foreign governments before they’ll take anyone in Washington seriously.

      • BO is a puppet made to look like a leader to the gullible masses. It’s really not much more complicated than that. The infighting between the New Dems and Repubs just keeps everone busy. But. They don’t make much difference. In many ways, this is worse than 1984, the book.

  5. The Sarah Palin Post, aka HP :

    “Daily Rundown” co-host Chuck Todd attempted to defend Palin, saying, “We’ve all done notes.”

    But Mitchell said that Palin’s “cheat sheets” were damaging in that she had described Presdeint Obama as a “charismatic guy with a teleprompter.”

    “If Mitt Romney had notes on his hand, wouldn’t we take it pretty seriously?” Mitchell asked Todd and co-host Savannah Guthrie.

    “She does, sort of, get played… she has different rules,” Todd stammered.

    • Not real eager to pay any attention whatsoever to anything Mrs. Alan Greenspan has to say.

      What the HELL was Alan Greenspan doing on Meet the Press to tell us where the economy needs to go? Hasn’t he already been shamed and discredited?

      Let’s hear from Brooksley Born, thank you very much.

      • I posted it more for the oddness of Toddler’s remarks… it sounds like he’s saying the “different rulz” she has is special treatment… as if Mitt Romney has to clear a higher bar than Palin. Yeah, right.

        • I knew that….didn’t mean to sound like I was jumping you.

          Toddler’s an idiot. They OWN him. Everybody knows it.

          And Mrs. Alan Greenspan? Ugh

    • Violet has a post about this too:

      http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2010/02/08/oh-goody-years-and-years-of-double-standards-to-look-forward-to/comment-page-1/#comment-39180

      Comments are worth a read.

      I use a shopping list, but am able to extemporize at the grocery store.

      • ROFLMAO!!

        I use a shopping list, but am able to extemporize at the grocery store.

        Cleanup on aisle two–Sophie has coffee all over her keyboard!

    • Oh and I caught Morning Joe…

      The part they picked on was Sarah saying “hopey changey” to mock Obama… they played the clip, Scarborough tried to be playful in ribbing Palin, “Oh that Tina Fey… Palin would never say hopey changey…” but Barnacle flat out said (paraphrasing a bit but mostly these were his words) “People know this is a dangerous world, and when they hear someone saying hopey changey…. ” blah blah they don’t take her seriously. And, Mika made one of her “ouch –exactly!” expressions and agreed with him.

      The whole time I was wondering… um… you sat through two years of Obama just saying HOPE! CHANGE! and praised him for it… and Palin was saying hopey changey mockingly and *that’s* what you criticize her for I listened to her speech and she said a lot of tired old rhetoric about limited govt that could have been easily challenged, but instead the Washington media focuses on what she wrote on her hand or her saying hopey changey as a dig… Anyhow, after the panel was already sort of wrapping up the discussion about Palin, Mika suddenly jumps in at the end snidely to say the buzz in DC is that the Republican insiders are trying to get rid of her. Which… um… hello is not newz…the GOP establishment really hasn’t liked her much from the getgo.

      • whoops, missed a question mark in that last para and made a mess . Should say, ” and *that’s* what you criticize her for ?

      • How would Mika know what the “Republican insiders” are saying or doing?

        Good Lord, Mika.

        • to be fair I can’t remember if she used the words “Republican insiders” or not, but the gist was that there was talk in the party about getting rid of her. Which really isn’t news right? We have heard this drumbeat for awhile. It’s just another version of WWTSBQ

      • Is Sarah belittling poor poor Obama again?? :cry:

        • Lol, see but they didn’t even acknowledge that she was belittling Obama. Or even that she was reacting to Obama. The “new” spin is as if Sarah Palin owned the words “hopey changey” all on her own in a vaccuum devoid of any context.

      • I have to disagree. Palin did not come off well. The hopey changey joke is old and anyway, it’s no time to be joking anymore, it’s time to have some answers, and she has none. it’s hard to admit, because though I still object to the mysogony with which the MSM received her, and liked her when she was gov, way before she was the VP candidate, I’m not impressed with her anymore. She’s just another personality looking to get to be President without actually knowing anything you need to know in order to get there. Gosh, if there was a way to be selected as the Super Bowl MVP without actually playing football well, or even ever practicing, you’d have the Obamas and Palins of the world trying to win that too.

        • emma, wait a sec–I didn’t care for Palin’s speech either. Did you miss that part?

          I just think it’s strange that the Morning Joe crowd only chose to highlight “hopey changey” clip out of everything, when they are the ones that ate up Obama’s cheesy and mindless hopenchange in the first place. I didn’t see them aggressively go after him for not bringing any substance to the table. Instead they mocked Clinton for her boring wonkish appeals to the voters. They apply different rulz as they see fit. Obama never had to prove substance, nor Bush.

          • Sorry, I did miss that, Wonk the Vote. I apologize and I agree with you. I guess I’m starting to get really creeped out by Palin (or is it her supporters in the Tea Party?) and so don’t feel so much like defending her anymore. I thought her reading off her hand was unbelievably immature – as bad as tele-prompting to 6th graders. But, yes, you’re right – women can’t win – Hillary was too serious and Palin not serious enough. I continue to feel bereft at it all.

        • I have started to think the same about Palin. It does seem that she has devolved over time. I love her outspokenness, but she is not using it for much good right now.

          • She’s nailing down a power base on the right. Whether or not she runs herself, she will be a GOP kingmaker.

          • I don’t know about GOP kingmaker, but she will make a lot of money, esp. as long as people feel the need to make everything she does the first 20 headlines of the day.

          • I haven’t heard Palin say anything that would place her outside of the GOP mainstream.

            A GOP moderate is a militia member who’s run out of ammunition.

        • I think she did well if her purpose was to cement a base.(going for the dissaffected Republicans) I think that, as an independant, I have been very turned off by what she has been saying and I think alot of what she has said has been crafted as political gamery rather than anything that strikes me as an intelligent counterpoint. In the words of Colbert, there’s a “truthiness” to what she says. I wouldn’t go so far as to call it truthfulness. When you claim the guy who basically is doing the same thing as the guy in front of him is somehow endangering the country because he isn’t tough enough on security you can’t claim the high ground.

      • Barnacle is a disgustingly sexist blabber mouth and I can not believe they can’t find any one better to represent the democratic point of view for that show. Mika is a joke… I realize Joe has a delicate republican male ego, but couldn’t he find a woman with actual ideas of her own to be on the show with him?

        • You’ll love this true story about Mika:

          Amidst historians on their show one morning , she said her favorite FOUNDING FATHER was Abraham Lincoln.

          No sh*t.

        • Barnicle was fired from The Boston Globe for plagarism. Why anyone would hire him, I don’t know.

    • Well, Obama IS a “charismatic guy with a teleprompter.” But she can’t be allowed to actually say that, can she?

  6. The whole entire brouhaha over clif notes for either side aggravates me. I really could care less whether someone writes on their hand or reads from a teleprompter. I’d much rather discuss the content of what they are saying and place it into the context of what is occuring and what they are doing.

    It seems to me that people are still going down the same path with Palin as they did with Obama. There seems to be this intent focus on crap that really doesn’t matter and less focus on actual policy.

    What troubles me even more was yesterday someone pointed out that alot of people who are defending her sound exactly like the obots when you point to the lack of policy specifics(even though she says she is open to a 2012 bid). There seems to be this erroneous belief that the President isn’t supposed to consider policy until actually elected.

    • I agree. She claims to be fiscally conservative but is pro-Afghan war spending. Those views are inconsistent in my book. Nobody asks her to explain her statements.

      • I thought she did explain her position on the Afghan war and she compared it to something else where spending is high…..I just don’t listen to her closely enough to remember exactly. I understood why she would take the position she did, but didn’t agree with it, so promptly forgot.

        I’ll see if I can find a clip, but I truly think Palin is going to go the way of Guiliano and get eliminated from the candidate pool early in the game after being considered the front-runner during early announcements.

        I hope both parties can come up with a candidate of true substance next time. I’d love to know what it feels like to have to decide who is best out of two great choices.

        • I’m not holding out much hope since the left still seems more interested in petty details(“Look, she wrote notes on her hand! Whatabimbo! Who cares if our guy uses notes too on a big ol’ teleprompter? People won’t notice that hypocrisy at all.) and the many on the right seem to see in Sarah Palin what the left saw in Obama.(Who cares if she isn’t offering policy specifics? She’s charismatic. She doesn’t like Obama like us and she’s got an R after her name.)

          The tribes comprise 60% of the population. Until we can get 11% of hem to see that the petty bickering and the tribalism isn’t helping things we’re going to be stuck in a really, really harmful loop. Hopefully some of them wake up before the US is bankrupted and its citzenry left with nothing.

      • Another of her disturbing beliefs:

        “I disagree with the Obama administration on that,” Palin said. “I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don’t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.”

        While her assertion that more and more Jews will be “flocking” to Israel soon is dubious (the immigration of US Jews to Israel hit an 18-year low in 2007 while the Palestinian population in the area is growing at faster rate than the Jewish one), her wholehearted support for settlement expansion on land Israel seized in 1967 is an outlier. The West Bank and East Jerusalem are considered to be illegally occupied by the UN and most world governments .

        Nov. 13, 2009 (Barbara Walters interview)

        • Maybe she thinks more Ameican jewish folk will immigrate as the American government fails to implement health care, fininacial regulation, or anything else that actually passes for productive policy.
          ;)

    • I agree that that this is political positioning and a play for power. For substance I look elsewhere. I just added to my Google “alerts” the two physicians who have been arrested while pursuing a campaign to get single payer on the agenda. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=897218&category=ALBANY&BCCode=&newsdate=2/5/2010

      Something is going to topple this house of cards of a political system we have going. What, when or where ?

    • We will have a sims character run for president someday, although last time I said that someone else asked, “Didn’t that already happen in 2008″

    • It is entirely possible that to the far Right, Palin is what Obama was to the New Democrats. Let’s be grateful she is giving them much more of herself early on so they have time to see the reality of her. The Obama trick was to not give his followers enough time to clear their eyes and heads of his magic.

      As for the brouhaha over the teleprompter usage, that is really just emphasis in the criticisms that Obama doesn’t ever just talk to the people. He reads to us from the book of “anything to make them happy.” I doubt any liberals would complain one bit about what crutches he used to share his thoughts if only his actions would be a reflection of his words.

      • I could care less if he “talks” to me. I don’t expect to “drink a beer” with the President. I want a President that is capable and willing to implement reforms to improve the country. I actually would prefer less “talk” and more “action.” Frankly, he could read from the teleprompter once a week and twice on Fridays and it wouldn’t matter one whit if he passed meaningful health care reform or financial industry reform. The teleprompter isn’t my problem any more than the crib notes are a problem for me.

  7. I am neither surprised or disappointed by the performance of BO and the Dimocrtic led congress. I fully expected that after the Dimocrats had sat back and let the economy, war on terrorism, health care reform, etc. go to hell so they could show the voters that the Rethuglicans could not lead. Mission accomplished. Now that they have to actually do something, it is natural that after this many years of doing nothing, they are only capable of doing the same.

    As far as the Commander in Chief goes, he was a puppet for the media to keep HRC and former President Clinton out of power. They, the media, knew better than we did that this would have been bad for the country. Now that they have saddled us with a POTUS who has had his resume padded throughout his political career by well meaning political operatives, the mainstream media seems to be themeless in dealing with the situation.

    While I said I was neither surprised or disappointed about the state of leadership in Washington, I am greatly pained. Due to their deep dysfunction, the Dimocrats are fast on their way to restoring the abhorrent Rethuglicans to power.

    • I understand and agree with some of your frustration, but misspelling the word Democrat just makes you sound like Limbaugh.
      Can’t we let the republicans own the name calling?

      • I have no qualms about labeling the current leadership in Washington as Dimocrats. I would not defend this last year of leadership form comments by Limbaugh either.

        When the Dimocats begin to behave in a coherent and constructive manner, I will be more than glad to treat them respectfully. Until then ….

        • I think the current lot does own the name Dimocrats.

          Limbaugh is a creepy messenger, but his skewering of the left often does poke holes exactly where the left is very weak. (It’s just that he usually ends up being no less creepy than the people he is skewering. Case-in-point, the way he went about attacking Rahm’s retarded comment. Yuck!)

    • I don’t think the political operatives were “well meaning” at all. I think they had an agenda but it had little to do with the best intentions towards the majority of the electorate and much more to do with filling their own pockets with dough.

      They saw Obama as an opportunity to collect some cash from the suckers(electorate) while still collecting a hefty paycheck from industry. Furthermore, the industry folks figured that with someone like him they could continue playing political charades with Republicans bellowing socialist and Democrats hollering obstructionist in Congress and neither party doing little else due to gridlock.

      Meanwhile the guy in the WH is rocking back and forth going “Why don’t they like me? Why don’t they like me?” at the Republican party he continues to try and placate instead of actually leading the party he was elected to lead.

      • Perhaps he can take another vacation to soothe himself.

        • Does he ever really get too far away from his playtime?

          I’ll bet the WH was rocking with a beerfest all weekend while he and his buddies did the SuperBowl thing.

        • And wonder why his photo opps don’t have the charm they used to.

  8. A snippet from John Smart: The entire post is worth reading…….

    Obama has made himself into a figurehead. He’s acting like the queen of England, a titular head of state with little real power beyond the symbolic. But even that comparison doesn’t work. Queen Elizabeth does have real power based in a thousand years of history and tradition. Obama has a campaign he ran once.

    There’s a Norma Desmond quality to Obama’s announcements of late. He’s a former movie star locked in a mansion refusing to see that the world has moved on. Admittedly, it isn’t that bad. Still, it’s easy to picture Obama alone in the dark White House screening room viewing an endless loop of 2008 campaign rallies, mixing resentments and cigarettes, and wondering why the people got so small.

  9. The deal was for a “fixed price certain contract,”

    Construction contracts customarily have financial/time penalties built into them. Often the contractor will get penalized a certain amount for each day the project is delayed. Or in reverse, the contractor may get paid more for finishing early.

    Of course, the goal is on-time completion. But it can encourage shoddy workmanship or sub-standard materials.

    I recall hearing a bridge-design engineer friend talking about his on-site inspections to make sure that materials and methods were adequate. But it’s impossible to inspect everything at all stages.

    • We have mostly natural gas fired electrical generation and we do not have exploding plants. NG is relatively clean, inexpensive and safe.

  10. getitnow said: There’s a Norma Desmond quality to Obama’s announcements of late. He’s a former movie star locked in a mansion refusing to see that the world has moved on.

    It’s a “job” to him – a role he agreed to pay for a price
    we haven’t really identified the price yet – although I think BB is really on to something there. As long as he believes he’ll get his “pay” he’ll keep playing the role.

    • We haven’t identified the exact price, but we’re know who’s paying for it: ‘jobless’ recovery, no health care, cuts to education….

  11. oops – “play” not pay for a price.

  12. … the White House strategy to intensify its push to engage congressional Republicans in policy negotiations, share the burden of governing…

    WTF? This clueless hack of a Democratic POTUS thinks voters elected him to do Republican-type governing?

    And note the “burden of governing” phrase. Presidentin’ is such hard work, eh? Where have we heard that before?

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2011011934.html

  13. I would love to see a real “debate” on the health care legislation. But let’s start off with the physical setting of real debate, not the President at his bully pulpit consescending to take questions from the masses (Republicans). Let’s have a round table discussion, all beginning on equal footing like real “debate”. And this time, when Obama refuses to answer questions and begins his “strawman” rhetoric, I hope the Republicans have the guts to call him on it. Keep asking the question until you get an answer.

    • Televised on C-Span?

      • Yes, don’t you agree?

        • They should hold meetings and decide the best way to reform healthcare. Whatever the majority decides should be offered to Obama for approval. The states can select representives from both parties, depending on whose ideas they like best.

          We could call it “Congress”

          • according to a CBS/NY Times poll, the majority (59%) wanted single payer in February 2009. That’s why the Democons had to mess it up.

          • What a novel idea!

          • I truly do not think that 20% of Americans could give you a description of what “single payer” means. And the same goes for “public option”. People fear what they do not understand, and with the mistrust of Congress already in place because of TARP and the “stimulus” bill, this rejection of the present health care “reform” legislation should hardly be a surprise.

          • But that’s just it, the words single payer weren’t in that poll–peoplewere asked if the government should provide national health insurance (59% said yes– 49% yes to providing national insurance for ALL problems, 10% to providing national health insurance for emergencies) or whether insurance should be left to private enterprise (only 32% said yes). That was a shift from the past, where it was the other way around. The 2008 talk of universal health care had made people more open to it–Obama and the Dems didn’t want to put any actual popular proposals on the table, they served up Republican bills with Democratic mandates and poisoned the well again, making people associate crappy policy with healthcare reform.

    • Oops, “condescending”, but you knew that!

    • Uh the masses aren’t just Republicans. And there is a reason that the Republicans aren’t on even footing…..they lost. Let me know when the Democrats force them t hold meetings in the basement and then I’ll feel sorry for the poor, poor Republicans not getting their say.

    • I think the Republicans are just going to harp on tort reform and interstate insurance.

  14. I have come to the conclusion that Sarah Palin’s vagina is haunted.

    It is possessed by evil spirits that drive her opponents and critics insane.

    • You know, the hate coming from the left blogs is just so irrational it defies description. I felt the same way about “Hillary hate” during the primaries. I guess the anonymity of the blogs enables people to say things they wouldn’t say otherwise, but what on earth is brewing inside of these people that they can conjure up such vile, illogical and divisive hate?

    • Ugh. I finally gave up over at TalkLeft. The progressive blogosphere appears to be full of elementary age children. Their debating strategy is limited to “she’s a dumb girl who needs notes.”

      It’s bizarre.

      They are making her a very sympathetic figure. I dont think I know a single woman who can’t relate to being marginalized because of her gender.

      • I saw some of the comments. Sexism and stupidity seem to be joined at the hip.

        • I’ve lost my ability to reply on the thread. I headed to another to point out the Bimbostein remark. I wonder if I’ll have my very first banning.

          • I randomly vented about that downthread earlier.. If anything, the progs and the MSM who devote so much newspace to her every move are the ones who created any bimbostein monster.

          • Jeralyn must have turned off the thread.

            My faith in BTD is restored. ;)

            If nothing else he’s always been fair to allow people who disagree with him to air their views.

            Yesterday I resisted when Jeralyn called her a witless wonder but today I couldn’t let it stand that people not look at why people like myself, who disagree vehemently with Palin on policy would defend her on handgate.

  15. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aBiyYBTjExBI&pos=11

    “Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) — Insurers, drugmakers and hospitals will likely slash costs and merge companies to maneuver through a U.S. health-care landscape marked by rising medical expenses and the loss of millions of potential paying customers.

    With Congress’ sweeping overhaul of the health system stalled, industry will seek its own answers to a push by government and the private sector to rein in costs, said Curtis Lane, senior managing director at MTS Health Partners, a New York-based equity fund.”

    I’m sure reigning in costs will mean denying more claims and higher co-pays, deductibles, etc.

    • And the denial of claims means more and more paperwork and time spent by healthcare providers who want to advocate for their patients. I already spend far too much time in paperwork and too little in face-to-face time with my patients.

      My latest peeve is the multi-page letters sent out by “pharmacy benefits management” companies, in which they complain a patient is getting meds prescribed by too many providers. Well, they could just look at the address for those prescribers — it’s the same clinic! I work in a group practice and we follow up on, and renew meds for, each other’s patients frequently.

      • A few years ago I read an article that stated the number of people involved in the administrative side of health care was larger than the number of people actually involved in the care of the patient. I think very few physicians would refute that statement.

        • It’s true. Most docs must function with approx. 3 – 4 support staff per Dr. just to keep up, and that is just his/her own staff. That doesn’t even count the administrative staff on the other end – the insurance company end.

          The number of man-hours you are paying for every time you see a doctor is unbelievable, and MOST of that is not medical care. And BTW, Medicare is not immune, though it’s less cumbersome than the private insurers. A lot of the regulations that get put in for “cost control”, or to weed out “fraud and abuse” actually make things more expensive, because of those man hours.

          If you are spending a million a day on the staff and paperwork to track down 600,000 worth of “fraudulent” claims, you are not really coming out ahead. You’d actually be better off leaving it be, and vigorously prosecuting and doing clawbacks the egregious ones when they come to light.

          Want things to be cheaper? SIMPLIFY. That was one of my beefs with the HCR bills. Anytime you create a massive bureaucracy that tries to micro-manage, even with very good intent, and even with the best intentions, it always ends up costing way too much.

          Go with flat simple fee schedules, leave it to the doc’s judgement what is “medically necessary”, and end all this convoluted medical coding, pre-authorizing, and “justifying” rigamarole. He/she bills, he/she gets paid. Simple. No need for 6 people to fine-tooth the claim. Do random audits, and if any doc is abusing the system, then there is VERY public prosecution and penalties with nasty teeth. Otherwise, leave them the hell alone.

          • Great post. I have one sign at my desk at work, it says “SIMPLIFY”. And, in terms of any legislation, the more cumbersome it gets, the more “nooks and crannies” to hide the real agendas from the public. “Pass it now, we’ll ‘tweak’ it later” is just a horrendous way to legislate.

  16. The wankfest over Sarah’s hand-writing reminds me of a story.

    A cop is on the witness stand being cross-examined by a defense attorney. Every time the attorney asks a question the cop looks at his hand before answering.

    The defense attorney asks “Officer, why do you keep looking at your hand?

    I have a note written there” the cop replies.

    Would you read that note the jury?” the attorney asks.

    The cop looks at his hand and says “Don’t let the asshole make you mad.”

    • Sarah had “Hi Mom” written on her hand yesterday while campaigning for Perry in Texas. No complaining to the media about their coverage of her 5 or 6 word “cheat sheet”, no playing the victim, just something to get the haters even more riled up. This is truly better than any primetime TV I have ever watched.

    • I know this won’t happen but it amazes me that the people who are suffereing fron Palin Derangement Syndrome don’t get that their incessant and for the most part, stupid attacks are not hurting Palin, they are helping her. She’s more successful and higher profile than she’s ever been right now.

  17. Palin is a “Frankenstein” that the MSM and the left created… if they are so scared of the “power” she has, they have no one to blame but themselves for giving that power to her.

  18. John Murtha has passed away

  19. John Murtha’s very healthy appetite for “pork” is well known here in PA, many articles coming out in the last year or so about the multi-million dollar airport that accomodates something like 4 flights a day. I didn’t know that fact about his district voting for McCain, but still think the people would have kept re-electing him.

    • It’s only “pork” when the money goes to another district. When your representative does it, it’s called “bringing home the bacon.”

    • Like it or not, all politics is local in many ways. I grew up in SC, and despised Strom Thurmond’s politics, plus he embarrassed the hell out of me. But you would find few people in the state, black or white, who did not give him props for taking care of his state.

      People used to ask me how he managed to get a higher percentage of even the black vote than almost any other Republican in the country – I mean, WTF??? How is that possible? But the answer was simple. If you were a SC citizen, and had a problem, he helped. Period. If you called his office with a beef, his staff listened. Some govt agency giving you a hard time, you are poor with no influence, don’t know what to do? Call Strom. He’ll fix it for you, if he at all can. I personally knew people whom he solved IRS harassment problems for – and they were nobodies of low income, and one a Mexican immigrant to boot. This was not uncommon – his staff just flat bent over backwards to treat every single resident like the most important person in the world.

      Many, many poor people and blacks voted for him despite their distaste for his national politics, because he was a ferocious protecter of, and gave daily genuine service to, the people of his own state.

      Murtha was of that ilk, I think, in a lot of ways. It leads to some bad parochial-focused policy at the expense of the country, and corruption, and pork. But it is no surprise at all that the people of Murtha’s district kept him, even knowing all that. They felt like he’d go to bat for THEM, so overlooked a lot.

      • Enlightening post, WMCB. Thank you.

        Kucinich is also supposed to have a reputation for excellent constituent service? Anyone confirm that?

  20. Barely got home.The traffic down here is maddening! The airport appears to have people all over the place. It’s like a thousands of people all around the fences by the runways. It’s nuts. Also, Fox News is down here in the ninth ward. I keep having to drive around news vans.

  21. New thread up.

  22. He’s back:

    http://tinyurl.com/y959kbz

    “CIT Names Ex-Merrill Chief John Thain to Run Lender”

  23. Obama is going for Cheney level approval soon

    Independent voters see Pres. Obama in a negative light by a nearly 2-1 margin, according to a new Marist College survey, while almost half of voters say he has failed to meet their expectations.

    The poll, conducted Feb. 1-3, showed just 44% of registered voters approving of Obama’s job as president. 47% disapprove. But among indie voters, Obama’s approval rating sits at a terrible 29%, while his disapproval rating is at 57%.

    Obama’s 44% job approval rating is the lowest he has scored in any non-internet poll since moving into the WH, according to a review of data compiled by Pollster.com.

    Those are pathetic numbers. His personal approval is finally dropping like a rock, and it’s not Rasmussen.

    “How’s that hopey changy thing doin’ for ya?” looks like a pertinent question.

    • From Marist’s pdf:

      D.C. Politicians, “Are You Listening?”
      There’s more bad news for Beltway insiders. 56% of registered voters view the 2010 midterm elections as more about sending a message to D.C. politicians. 36% report the election will be more about local issues important to their state or community. 8% are unsure.
      This “send a message to Washington” sentiment is stronger among Republicans and Independents. 62% of GOP members and 61% of Independents want Washington politicians to catch on. This compares with a plurality — 48% — of Democrats who share this view.

  24. Whoopi, Babs, Sherri, and Meghan McCain, talking about Sarah Palin:

  25. This should keep politicians of both parties awake at night. Looks like Americans have largely figured out the con.

    75% Are Angry At Government’s Current Policies

    Voters are madder than ever at the current policies of the federal government.

    A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 75% of likely voters now say they are at least somewhat angry at the government’s current policies, up four points from late November and up nine points since September. The overall figures include 45% who are Very Angry, also a nine-point increase since September.

    Just 19% now say they’re not very or not at all angry at the government’s policies, down eight points from the previous survey and down 11 from September. That 19% includes only eight percent (8%) who say they’re not angry at all and 11% who are not very angry.

    Part of the frustration is likely due to the belief of 60% of voters that neither Republican political leaders nor Democratic political leaders have a good understanding of what is needed today. That finding is identical to the view last September, just after the tumultuous congressional town hall meetings the month before. But only 52% felt this way in November.

    Americans are united in the belief “that the political system is broken, that most politicians are corrupt, and that neither major political party has the answers,”

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 356 other followers

%d bloggers like this: