• Tips gratefully accepted here. Thanks!:

  • Recent Comments

    katiebird on Who do these people think they…
    littleisis on Memorial Day 2012
    nancyD on I live in the real world
    teresainpa on I live in the real world
    riverdaughter on Memorial Day 2012
    Willie Buck Merle on Memorial Day 2012
    Procopius on I live in the real world
    Partition Functions on Friday Science Horror Sto…
    Joseph Cannon on I live in the real world
    Riverdaughter on I live in the real world
    r u reddy on I live in the real world
    r u reddy on I live in the real world
    Partition Functions on Friday Science Horror Sto…
    Joseph Cannon on I live in the real world
    riverdaughter on I live in the real world
  • Recent posts delivered to your door — Follow TC on Twitter

  • Categories


  • Tags

  • Archives

  • History

    December 2009
    S M T W T F S
    « Nov   Jan »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • RSS Cannonfire

  • The Confluence

    The Confluence

  • RSS Suburban Guerrilla

    • Florida expert suspended for refusing wetlands permit
      Wetlands are a vital part of the ecosystem, and there are all sorts of shenanigans that go on with the state mitigation programs – Florida being infamous for all kinds of backchannel practices: Florida’s top state wetlands expert has been suspended after she refused to issue a permit on a controversial project — one that [...]
  • RSS Ian Welsh

    • What’s left of the economy will roll off a cliff
      in the beginning of next year.  China is heading for a hard landing, Europe is a basket case and once the election is over no one will be propping up the US economy for a while. Make as much money as you can now, work as much overtime, unless you’re sure your revenue stream is [...]
  • Top Posts

Monday Morning News and Views

A light dusting of snow

Good Morning Conflucians! It’s a shocking 19 degrees here in the Boston area, and we have snow on the ground. I don’t like this one bit.

Today is Pearl Harbor Day. The LA Times has a story on the discovery of a Japanese mini-submarine that may have participated in the attack that took place on December 7, 1941–68 years ago.

Five mini-subs were to participate in the strike, but four were scuttled, destroyed or run aground without being a factor in the attack. The fate of the fifth has remained a mystery. But a variety of new evidence suggests that the fifth fired its two 800-pound torpedoes, most likely at the battleships West Virginia and Oklahoma, capsizing the latter. A day later, researchers think, the mini-sub’s crew scuttled it in nearby West Loch.
[....]

The two-man, 80-foot-long sub in question does not have a name of its own. Each of the five subs in the attack was carried by a conventional submarine and took its name from the mother boat. It is thus called the I-16-tou — tou being Japanese for boat. Powered by a 600-horsepower electric motor, the sub could reach underwater speeds of 19 knots, twice as fast as many of the U.S. subs of the day.

Mary Duarte Tafolla, 91, of San Antonio remembers the day vividly. She was in the hospital, having given birth to a baby girl two days earlier. When she heard the bombs going off, she thought it was an earthquake.

When the nurses kept running around frantically with their eyes filled with tears, and the doctors were nowhere to be found, Tafolla, then 23, knew something was wrong. “I asked, ‘What happened?’ But the nurses would just sniff into their handkerchiefs and say, ‘It’s just — uh — Army maneuvers’ and disappear.”

The daughter of Spanish immigrants who came to the islands in 1912 to work as laborers in pineapple plantations, the Hawaii native knew something was amiss on the usually laid-back island of Oahu. By that night, things were even stranger. Her doctor had not checked in on her, none of her eight siblings, friends or parents had come to visit, and the nurses were doing their hospital room visits in the dark, carrying flashlights.

Luckily, Tafolla’s husband, who was in the Navy, was out at sea when the Japanese attacked and he also survived.

“When I got to San Antonio, to live with my in-laws, the newspaper reporter came and put my picture in the paper. But the newspaper also gave my address out.”

She recalls that the saddest part for her was the series of visitors and families who came to the Tafolla family door to ask desperately, “‘Did you know my son? Did you see my son?’”

“So many died. I was lucky. My husband, my baby and me. We came out of it healthy and in one piece. It was a huge blessing,” she said.

In more current news, many outlets are reporting that when President Obama met with Democratic Senators, he had nothing to say about a public option in the insurance company bailout health care reform bill.

Huffpo: Obama Silent On Public Option In Speech To Senators

As President Obama finished his speech to the Democratic caucus in the Capitol’s Mansfield Room on Sunday afternoon, Joe Lieberman made his way over to Harry Reid.

The independent who still caucuses with Democrats wanted to point something out to the Majority Leader: Obama didn’t mention the public option.

He also didn’t talk about the amendments that would restrict women’s ability to get abortions and other kinds of reproductive health care.

The Hill: Obama meets Dems without addressing divisive issues; negotiations continue

Obama didn’t take questions from the senators or mention the two issues now dividing Senate Democrats and preventing passage of the bill: a government-run insurance plan and restrictions on federal funds for abortion. But Democrats said that Obama’s remarks gave them a boost as they try to strike compromises to get the 60 votes needed to pass the bill.

That’s leadership we can believe in! {snark}

In contrast, Bill Clinton is showing some real leadership today by providing some support to Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley despite the fact that most Democratic politicians have backed her opponent Michael Capuano. Chris Cillizza of the WaPo seems somewhat disapproving.

Clinton says that Coakley “will go to Washington to fight every day to create good jobs with good benefits and to get health reform with a strong public option.” Clinton’s support is consistent with his recent pattern of rewarding political loyalty — Coakley was an early endorser of then Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid. Bill Clinton is the most high profile endorser to make his preference known in the special and his support of Coakley may well be aimed at stifling any last minute momentum for Rep. Mike Capuano who was endorsed by former Massachusetts governor Michael Dukakis and Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey over the past week.

In other news, the climate change summit begins in Copenhagen today. The New York Times reports Climate Talks Open With Calls for Urgent Action

A much-anticipated global meeting of nearly 200 nations — all seeking what has so far been elusive common ground on the issue of climate change — got under way here on Monday with an impassioned airing of what leaders here called the political and moral imperatives at hand.

“The clock has ticked down to zero,” said the United Nations’ climate chief, Yvo de Boer. “After two years of negotiation, the time has come to deliver.”

In a column titled “An Affordable Truth,” Paul Krugman says he’s optimistic about the climate talks.

Maybe I’m naïve, but I’m feeling optimistic about the climate talks starting in Copenhagen on Monday. President Obama now plans to address the conference on its last day, which suggests that the White House expects real progress. It’s also encouraging to see developing countries — including China, the world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide — agreeing, at least in principle, that they need to be part of the solution.

What are you reading this morning? Please post links in the comments and…

HAVE A MARVELOUS MONDAY!!!!
digg!!! tweet!!! share!!!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine

33 Responses

  1. I don’t understand this story about the pharma industry giving billions of dollars to support the health care bill

    Pharmaceutical industry may have to bow to pressure, give more than $80B for health overhaul

    Who are they giving this money to?

    • Oh, I see.

      The pharmaceutical industry agreed to provide $80 billion in drug subsidies and fees in a June deal with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and the White House. Baucus aides said the bill his panel approved in October honored that figure.

      The version the Senate is debating, written by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., might already be higher, although its final cost to the drug industry remains unclear.

      But the House bill would cost drugmakers about $140 billion, according to Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., chairman of the health subcommittee. That suggests an eventual House-Senate compromise is likely to exceed $80 billion.

      “They didn’t reach that agreement with us,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chief author of the House-passed bill, of the $80 billion figure. “We need all the money we can get to hold down costs.”

    • Bill Nelson is a holdout on the healthcare bill on this issue.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/06/nelson-ready-to-bust-phar_n_381812.html

  2. Wow, the Wapo article on Bill Clinton’s endorsement of Martha Coakley sure is pure grade A CDS.

    First of all, note the implication that Bill MUST be propelled only by political loyalty, whereas that just couldn’t be the case for, say, Ed Markey, who is another House Rep. from MA and a close political ally of Capuano.

    Also, it seems that the author of the article has no sense of Massachusetts voters. To state that endorsements of Ed Markey and Mike Dukakis (and don’t get me wrong, I’m a big Dukakis fan) could do much to create momentum for Capuano in MA is pretty silly. Whereas MA (with the exception of some Obamabots in Cambridge) is pretty much still Clinton country, so Bill’s endorsement probably means about as much as an endorsement can.

    In my mind, the only other endorsement that really might have made much of an impact would have been Boston mayor Tom Menino. But it seems as if at least in public he remained neutral.

    • Chris Cillizza is an a-hole from way back.

      Nancy Pelosi endorsed Capuano too. I’m sure that made a huuuuge difference
      /snark

      • Hehe..true.

        IMO, the most shameless displays in this campaign were the ads by both Capuano and Pagliuca that had Ted Kennedy’s face splashed all over them and that tried to argue that Ted would have wanted them to win.

        First of all, who tries to capitalize on dead people like that? It was creepy, if you ask me.

        And second of all, I think that the people who convinced Capuano and Pagliuca to run those ads must have been out-of-staters. Anyone who knows anything would know while MA residents do love the Kennedys, they don’t really care anymore about who the Kennedys endorse (even the dead ones). I mean, Ted Kennedy was one of Obama’s biggest supporters, and Obama got creamed by Hillary in the primary here.

  3. The media executive who probably most influenced last year’s election, NBC’s Jeff Zucker is falling fast.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ajJvek_vt9yA

  4. Haha, more hypocrisy PROMISES, PROMISES: A closed meeting on openness

    WASHINGTON — It’s hardly the image of transparency the Obama administration wants to project: A workshop on government openness is closed to the public.

  5. From The Hill piece:

    President Barack Obama gave Senate Democrats a “pep talk” on healthcare Sunday, telling them they stood to make history if they passed a bill expanding healthcare coverage to millions of Americans.

    This is his entire role–cheerleader–but with no clarity. He swoops in, gives a speech or an “attaboy” and is on his glorious way. Such a visionary…{gag}

    • That is how he ran the Harvard Law Review, according to staff there. Just poked his head in occasionally. That is his idea of leadership, as if people would not do their job without him urging them on.

    • And he didn’t even stay for questions/dialogue. It’s as if he can’t be bothered to put in real effort on the most important issues facing the nation.

  6. Reality TV’s Glare Hits High Office

    Considering the White House’s hulking, media-rich Web site, its Facebook page, photo galleries and podcasts on iTunes, the presidency seems less threatened by the incursion of a reality show than running an administration that is in danger of becoming one.

    One of the downsides of having a president who is also Celebrity in Chief is that it creates the impression that the leader of the free world is part of a milieu that is more TMZ than C-SPAN. In an effort to remain connected to the social media world that was so much a part of his electoral victory, the Obama administration may be guilty of a very contemporary common offense: Oversharing.

    The president can’t be blamed for a few knuckleheads trying to game their way into his presence, but his shared love of the camera leaves him vulnerable to suggestions that he is too busy appearing as the president and not busy enough being one. And we all know that television shows — reality or otherwise — can jump the shark.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/business/media/07carr.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

  7. Oh, this is rich–nothing about caucus reform:

    Democrats consider new presidential nominating process

    Washington (CNN) – National Democrats are considering changing the presidential nominating process, by establishing a new primary calendar and deemphasizing the influence lawmakers and political insiders have on choosing the party nominee.

    The battle for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination was marred by controversy as the Democratic National Committee argued with some state parties over when they could hold their primaries and caucuses and candidates were forced to take sides in this important internal party dispute

    The commission also discussed how to reduce the influence of unpledged delegates – lawmakers and party insiders also know as superdelegates – who played a big role in the 2008 nomination contest.

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/05/democrats-consider-new-presidential-nominating-process/

    • superdelegates – who played a big role in the 2008 nomination contest.

      I would say that giving the popular vote loser the nomination would definitely qualify as a “big role”

      I. Hate. Them. All.
      ps we want our party back

  8. Government censorship of the truth about U.S. foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor attack.

    http://www.antiwar.com/orig2/stinnett1.html

    • Thanks fif, I hadn’t seen this yet. I’ve been pretty much deleting emails lately, as I feel so fed up with most all political orgs.

      I like that Clinton gave an endorsement of Coakley. It’s an interesting signal, considering that Pelosi (the gender and good sense traitor) endorsed her opponent. I hope Coakley wins by a landslide. Bill’s doing the right thing, and letting everyone know he’s still fighting and still an independent Dem. Can’t buy the Clintons, apparently.

  9. Well, put this in the “Wah, wah wah, it’s not faiiiiiiir!” hubris column. It seems that the very same banksters who were perfectly okay last year with being among the “favored”, and not being forced to take any losses at all on their bad debts, while everyone from bondholders to taxpayers to mortgagees got royally screwed……..

    Well, the shoe is now on the other foot re: Dubai, World and boy are the Wall Streeters suddenly ALL concerned about TEH RULZ! “But, but, it’s not FAIR that the Arab states are giving preference to certain (their own) banks, and telling to rest of us to get bent! Waaaaah!” Denninger lays into them this morning:

    This is rather humorous, really….

    “Bankers are furious that two defaulting Saudi conglomerates that owe $20 billion (£12.2 billion) appear to be favouring local banks over foreign creditors. State-owned Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC and Standard Chartered are all understood to have exposure to Saad Group and Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Bros (Ahab). Dozens of other Western banks are also owed money, including Citigroup and BHP Paribas.”

    So what?

    You banksters were perfectly happy when you got preference you weren’t entitled to last year!

    Remember that? You got paid at par on things that were worth much less and in many cases zero. AIG Credit Default Swaps anyone? GM bonds? Chrysler bonds? Various bank deals that “protected” bondholders that should have taken losses, while screwing non-bank debtholders and others?

    I have raised hell about the refusal to honor the sanctity of the capital structure in these pages since, well, The Market Ticker began publication.

    But I haven’t seen any of you banksters complain when the favoritism and violation of the capital structure favored you!

    Now, suddenly, Saudi Arabia is joining the ranks of defaulting Arab nation-state-projects, and they’re doing the same sort of thing to foreign holders that those very same banks did to other people last year, in many cases bankrupting them outright.

    Angela Knight, head of the British Bankers’ Association, said yesterday: “This is an important issue for our members and one we would like to see resolved as calmly and quietly as possible.”

    Funny how secrecy always is a primary concern when you’re the one looking for something different…. and especially when you just got done screwing everyone else in the world a short time ago.

    I hope The House of Saud tells you where to stick your mendacity.

    http://market-ticker.org/archives/1705-Priority-Whats-That.html

    If it weren’t so sad, I’d be laughing my ass off. They are shocked, SHOCKED and appalled I tell you, that teh rulz would be bent to favor some creditors over others! How DARE anyone do that!

  10. I received this video in an e-mail. The sender asked me to pass it on as it was not widely reported in the USA.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE , MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  11. i do not know why the imbed would not work. I hope this does.

    It is something for all of us to see

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS, AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  12. Can one of the computer knowledgeable people here please get the you-tube video I posted to work.
    It is Israel’s memorial to 9-11.
    It is beautiful.
    Why is when you really want something to work It won’t/

    Help Help Help

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  13. Great roundup, thanks!

  14. Margot Kidder hits a home run in an article at CounterPunch Ax Max ;-)

    The Democratic Party needs an intervention and then it needs to be sent to rehab. The lunacy behind the thinking of many traditional Democrats that any Democrat in Congress is better than no Democrat at all needs to be exposed and treated for the infectious disease that it is. But there is no 12 step program for corrupt politicians, and turning the problem over to God is just not going to cut it this time, no matter what Sarah Palin thinks .

    The absence of democracy in a congress whose votes are bought, sold, and traded like pork bellies by big corporations in exchange for highly profitable votes and amendments on bills is a bi-partisan infection. And the pus is everywhere.

    h/t corrente

  15. Today must be the day for home runs. Chris Hedges: Liberals Are Useless

    Liberals are a useless lot. They talk about peace and do nothing to challenge our permanent war economy. They claim to support the working class, and vote for candidates that glibly defend the North American Free Trade Agreement. They insist they believe in welfare, the right to organize, universal health care and a host of other socially progressive causes, and will not risk stepping out of the mainstream to fight for them. The only talent they seem to possess is the ability to write abject, cloying letters to Barack Obama—as if he reads them—asking the president to come back to his “true” self. This sterile moral posturing, which is not only useless but humiliating, has made America’s liberal class an object of public derision.

  16. If anyone is interested in discussing the Ben Nelson Stupak-clone bill, I just put up a live blog. I’m watching the Senate debate–hope you’ll join me!

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 256 other followers